| 2011 House of Representatives |
|
Roll Call 548.
(H.R. 2354) On an amendment that would have increased funding by $227 million for energy efficiency and renewable energy programs, and would also have cut $227 million from nuclear weapons programs
Jul 12, 2011.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 546.
(H.R. 2354) On an amendment that would have increased funding by $491 million for renewable energy (such as wind and solar energy) research and development, and would also have cut $491 million from nuclear weapons programs
Jul 12, 2011.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 342.
(H.R. 1540) Legislation providing annual funding for Defense Department programs, continuing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy that banned gays from serving openly in the military, and prohibiting the Obama administration from implementing a nuclear weapons reduction treaty with Russia – On the resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to the bill
May 25, 2011.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 341.
(H.R. 1540) Legislation providing annual funding for Defense Department programs, continuing the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell Policy that banned gays from serving openly in the military, and prohibiting the Obama administration from implementing a nuclear weapons reduction treaty with Russia – On bringing to a final vote the resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to the bill
May 25, 2011.
|
N |
L |
| 2010 Senate |
|
Roll Call 298.
Ratification (enactment) of a nuclear weapons reduction treaty limiting the number of warheads the U.S. and Russia could maintain in their nuclear arsenals to 1,550
Dec 22, 2010.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 297.
On an amendment that would have required the president to certify that he had negotiated a legally binding agreement stating that Russia would not use “covers” with respect to its nuclear warheads (“covers” literally conceal nuclear weapons and thus hinder weapons inspections). This amendment was offered to a resolution accompanying a nuclear weapons reduction treaty known as the “New START Treaty.”
Dec 21, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 296.
On an amendment that would have required the president to certify that he had negotiated a legally binding agreement stating that Russia would not deploy a significant number of nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles during the duration of a nuclear weapons reduction treaty. This amendment was offered to a resolution accompanying a nuclear weapons reduction treaty known as the “New START Treaty.”
Dec 21, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 295.
On an amendment that would have required the U.S. Senate to review rulings made by a commission established to resolve disputes (relating to a nuclear weapons reduction treaty) between Russia and the U.S. if those rulings “create new rights or obligations for the United States.” This amendment was offered to a resolution accompanying a nuclear weapons reduction treaty.
Dec 21, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 294.
On tabling (killing) an amendment that would have required the president to certify that Russia had returned all military equipment owned by the United States that was confiscated during the Russian invasion of the Republic of Georgia in August 2008. This amendment was offered to a resolution accompanying a nuclear weapons reduction treaty.
Dec 21, 2010.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 293.
On an amendment – to a nuclear weapons reduction treaty – that would have explicitly limited the capacity of Russia and the U.S. to maintain rail mobile launchers (which enable nuclear weapons to be launched from trains). This amendment would have had the effect of killing the treaty for the foreseeable future;any tampering with the treaty’s language would have torpedoed the agreement entirely.
Dec 21, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 292.
A nuclear weapons reduction treaty limiting the number of warheads the U.S. and Russia could maintain in their nuclear arsenals to 1,550 – On the motion to end debate on the treaty
Dec 21, 2010.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 287.
On an amendment that would have required the United States and Russia to begin negotiations on an agreement to limit the possession of tactical nuclear weapons. (“Tactical weapons” are short-range nuclear weapons designed to be used on the battlefield.) This amendment was offered to a nuclear weapons reduction treaty. The amendment would have had the effect of killing the treaty for the foreseeable future;any tampering with the treaty’s language would have torpedoed the agreement entirely.
Dec 20, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 286.
On an amendment that would have increased the number of nuclear delivery systems permitted under a nuclear weapons reduction treaty. (A “nuclear delivery system” refers to the technology that launches a nuclear weapon in a manner that will enable it to detonate on or near its target.) This amendment would have effectively killed the treaty for the foreseeable future.
Dec 20, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 285.
On an amendment (to a nuclear weapons reduction treaty) that would have required additional inspections of nuclear weapons facilities. This amendment would have effectively killed the treaty for the foreseeable future.
Dec 20, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 283.
On an amendment stating that there was a “greater need for transparency” with respect to U.S. and Russian tactical weapons systems. This amendment was offered to a nuclear weapons reduction treaty, and would have had the effect of killing it entirely for the foreseeable future. (“Tactical weapons” are short-range nuclear weapons designed to be used on the battlefield)
Dec 19, 2010.
|
N |
W |
|
Roll Call 282.
On an amendment that would have eliminated language in a nuclear arms reduction treaty which some senators believed could harm U.S. efforts to build a missile defense system. This amendment would have effectively killed the treaty for the foreseeable future.
Dec 18, 2010.
|
N |
W |
| 2009 House of Representatives |
|
Roll Call 752.
(H.R. 3183) On passage of the conference report containing the agreement between the House and Senate on the legislation providing fiscal year 2010 funding for energy and water development programs
Oct 01, 2009.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 749.
(H.Res.788) The conference report containing the agreement between the House and Senate on the legislation providing fiscal year 2010 funding for energy and water development programs - - on the resolution setting the terms for debating the bill
Oct 01, 2009.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 592.
(H.R. 3183) On passage of the bill providing fiscal year 2010 funds for energy and water development.
Jul 17, 2009.
|
Y |
W |
|
Roll Call 321.
(H.R. 2410) On the Ros-Lehtinen of Florida Amendment, which would have withheld $4.5 million in funds for the International Atomic Energy Agency
Jun 10, 2009.
|
N |
W |
| 2007 House of Representatives |
|
Roll Call 14.
Implementing the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission (H.R. 1)/Motion to recommit with instructions
Jan 09, 2007.
|
N |
W |
| 2004 Senate |
|
Roll Call 113.
A vote on passage of a Democratic amendment to the fiscal year 2005 Defense Authorization Act (S. 2400) to prohibit the Defense Department from using $36.6 million authorized in the bill for programs to study a new generation of nuclear weapons.
Jun 15, 2004.
|
Y |
L |
| 2003 Senate |
|
Roll Call 189.
S. 1050. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote to Table (Kill) an Amendment to Cut Funding for the Development of
"Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons.
May 21, 2003.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 187.
S. 1050. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote to Allow the Development of "Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons.
May 21, 2003.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 186.
S. 1050. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote to Table (Kill) an Amendment to Block Research Funding for the
Development of "Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons.
May 20, 2003.
|
N |
L |
| 2003 House of Representatives |
|
Roll Call 617.
H R 1588. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote on Final Passage of a $401.5 Billion Conference Report Which Would Authorize Federal Spending on Defense-Related Programs in 2004.
Nov 07, 2003.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 221.
H.R. 1588. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Passage of a Bill to Provide Funding for the Research and Development of
"Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Defense Department from the Endangered Species Act.
May 22, 2003.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 218.
H.R. 1588. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote to Castigate France For Its Anti-War Stance on Iraq.
May 22, 2003.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 216.
H.R. 1588. Fiscal 2004 Defense Authorization/Vote to Transfer Funding for the Development of "Low-Yield" Nuclear
Weapons into Conventional Weapons Research.
May 22, 2003.
|
Y |
L |
| 2002 House of Representatives |
|
Roll Call 158.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Final Passage of a Bill to Authorize Spending on a Missile Defense Program
and Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Military from Environmental Regulations.
May 09, 2002.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 157.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Vote to Recommit to Committee a Bill to Authorize Spending on a Missile
Defense Program and Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Military from Environmental Regulations.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 152.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Procedural Vote Intended to Delay Consideration of a Bill to Authorize
Spending on a Missile Defense Program and Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Military from Environmental
Regulations.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 151.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 150.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 149.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 148.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 147.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 146.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 144.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 143.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 142.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Vote to Develop "Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons.
May 09, 2002.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 141.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Vote to Eliminate Funding for "Low-Yield" Nuclear Weapons.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 140.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 139.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 138.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003-Procedural Motion.
May 09, 2002.
|
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 136.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Vote on Rules of Debate on a Bill to Authorize Spending on a Missile Defense
Program and Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Military from Environmental Regulations.
May 09, 2002.
|
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 135.
HR 4546. Defense Authorization for 2003/Vote to Allow Consideration of a Bill to Authorize Spending on a Missile
Defense Program and Low-Yield Nuclear Weapons and Exempt the Military from Environmental Regulations.
May 09, 2002.
|
N |
L |
![[POW!]](images/boxer_l2.gif)
