What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2019-20 Lifetime 2019-20 % Rating
1 Cunningham, Joe D
SC-1
24.05 24.05 82.86 82.86 Strong Rep - 45.95 rank 5
2 Brindisi, Anthony D
NY-22
25.32 25.32 83.89 83.89 Strong Rep - 44.68 rank 5
3 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
29.11 29.11 88.35 88.35 Leaning Rep - 44.22 rank 5
4 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
39.95 65.82 74.22 90.20 Strong Dem - 43.38 rank 5
5 McAdams, Ben D
UT-4
27.85 27.85 79.07 79.07 Strong Rep - 42.15 rank 5
6 Horn, Kendra D
OK-5
29.11 29.11 86.73 86.73 Strong Rep - 40.89 rank 5
7 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
44.27 72.15 74.27 94.00 Strong Dem - 39.06 rank 5
8 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
35.44 35.44 85.90 85.90 Leaning Rep - 37.89 rank 5
9 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
39.01 34.18 81.75 88.00 Swing - 37.66 rank 5
10 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
40.51 40.51 90.74 90.74 Swing - 36.16 rank 5
11 Finkenauer, Abby D
IA-1
41.77 41.77 91.04 91.04 Swing - 34.90 rank 5
12 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
42.31 42.31 88.61 88.61 Swing - 34.36 rank 5
13 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
47.98 53.16 85.99 91.69 Leaning Dem - 32.02 rank 5
14 Peterson, Collin D
MN-7
39.10 37.97 60.63 77.27 Strong Rep - 30.90 rank 5
15 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
53.04 67.09 85.09 94.57 Strong Dem - 30.29 rank 5
16 Torres Small, Xochitl D
NM-2
44.30 44.30 90.35 90.35 Leaning Rep - 29.03 rank 5
17 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
44.30 44.30 90.71 90.71 Leaning Rep - 29.03 rank 5
18 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
48.06 41.77 84.43 88.23 Swing - 28.61 rank 5
19 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
55.67 79.75 88.26 97.35 Strong Dem - 27.66 rank 5
20 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
56.43 84.81 88.37 98.01 Strong Dem - 26.90 rank 5
21 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
56.99 74.68 79.40 94.46 Strong Dem - 26.34 rank 5
22 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
57.27 78.48 86.82 97.18 Strong Dem - 26.06 rank 5
23 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
53.95 73.08 82.75 95.84 Leaning Dem - 26.05 rank 5
24 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
50.63 50.63 92.04 92.04 Swing - 26.04 rank 5
25 Lipinski, Daniel D
IL-3
57.79 59.49 84.56 91.74 Strong Dem - 25.54 rank 5
26 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
58.11 70.89 91.00 95.93 Strong Dem - 25.22 rank 5
27 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
51.49 73.42 86.96 95.99 Swing - 25.18 rank 5
28 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
52.02 69.62 87.20 95.66 Swing - 24.65 rank 5
29 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
58.74 83.54 86.25 95.66 Strong Dem - 24.59 rank 5
30 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.12 75.95 79.22 95.93 Strong Dem - 24.21 rank 5
31 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
53.80 69.62 88.43 96.02 Swing - 22.87 rank 5
32 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
60.74 79.75 91.67 97.16 Strong Dem - 22.59 rank 5
33 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
54.43 54.43 93.18 93.18 Swing - 22.24 rank 5
34 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
58.37 67.09 90.69 95.52 Leaning Dem - 21.63 rank 5
35 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.05 59.74 82.94 92.40 Leaning Dem - 19.95 rank 5
36 González, Vicente D
TX-15
63.84 73.42 89.13 93.88 Strong Dem - 19.49 rank 5
37 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
60.76 60.76 94.36 94.36 Leaning Dem - 19.24 rank 5
38 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
60.91 77.22 90.33 96.32 Leaning Dem - 19.09 rank 5
39 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
64.89 74.68 92.44 96.08 Strong Dem - 18.44 rank 5
40 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
64.98 82.05 91.17 97.66 Strong Dem - 18.35 rank 5
41 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
65.62 87.34 91.06 97.98 Strong Dem - 17.70 rank 5
42 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
65.72 82.28 90.21 97.66 Strong Dem - 17.61 rank 5
43 Cox, T. J. D
CA-21
65.82 65.82 94.48 94.48 Strong Dem - 17.51 rank 5
44 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.46 76.92 88.10 96.65 Strong Dem - 16.87 rank 5
45 Rose, Max D
NY-11
56.96 56.96 92.27 92.27 Leaning Rep - 16.37 rank 5
46 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
67.14 78.48 89.49 96.92 Strong Dem - 16.19 rank 5
47 Case, Ed D
HI-1
67.16 65.82 82.21 95.17 Strong Dem - 16.17 rank 5
48 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
60.76 60.76 94.20 94.20 Swing - 15.91 rank 5
49 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
67.84 73.61 89.92 96.17 Strong Dem - 15.49 rank 5
50 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.24 79.49 88.31 97.15 Strong Dem - 15.09 rank 5
51 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
62.03 62.03 94.36 94.36 Swing - 14.64 rank 5
52 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
65.38 65.38 94.50 94.50 Leaning Dem - 14.62 rank 5
53 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
68.78 81.01 93.36 97.51 Strong Dem - 14.55 rank 5
54 Porter, Katie D
CA-45
65.82 65.82 94.14 94.14 Leaning Dem - 14.18 rank 5
55 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
63.29 63.29 94.84 94.84 Swing - 13.38 rank 5
56 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
67.09 67.09 95.35 95.35 Leaning Dem - 12.91 rank 5
57 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
67.27 77.22 91.58 96.98 Leaning Dem - 12.73 rank 5
58 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
70.77 83.33 92.57 97.84 Strong Dem - 12.56 rank 5
59 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
71.11 77.22 90.06 96.64 Strong Dem - 12.22 rank 5
60 Rouda, Harley D
CA-48
64.56 64.56 94.92 94.92 Swing - 12.11 rank 5
61 Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
62.03 62.03 94.53 94.53 Leaning Rep - 11.30 rank 5
62 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
72.08 83.54 91.52 97.16 Strong Dem - 11.25 rank 5
63 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.47 94.87 86.88 99.15 Strong Dem - 10.86 rank 5
64 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
72.77 74.68 94.06 96.52 Strong Dem - 10.56 rank 5
65 Cisneros, Gil D
CA-39
69.62 69.62 95.85 95.85 Leaning Dem - 10.38 rank 5
66 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.12 69.86 93.71 94.66 Strong Dem - 10.21 rank 5
67 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.30 92.31 87.18 98.99 Strong Dem - 10.03 rank 5
68 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
73.40 79.49 92.70 96.98 Strong Dem - 9.93 rank 5
69 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.44 84.81 91.36 97.95 Strong Dem - 9.89 rank 5
70 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
67.07 65.82 94.78 94.66 Swing - 9.60 rank 5
71 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
70.51 70.51 96.17 96.17 Leaning Dem - 9.49 rank 5
72 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
70.51 70.51 95.42 95.42 Leaning Dem - 9.49 rank 5
73 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
74.19 87.18 93.41 98.33 Strong Dem - 9.14 rank 5
74 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
70.89 70.89 96.02 96.02 Leaning Dem - 9.11 rank 5
75 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
74.35 85.71 94.25 98.15 Strong Dem - 8.98 rank 5
76 Loebsack, Dave D
IA-2
68.26 69.62 91.04 95.97 Swing - 8.41 rank 5
77 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
68.35 68.35 95.51 95.51 Swing - 8.32 rank 5
78 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.34 84.62 90.24 97.34 Strong Dem - 7.99 rank 5
79 Gabbard, Tulsi D
HI-2
75.38 66.15 92.47 93.09 Strong Dem - 7.95 rank 5
80 Visclosky, Peter D
IN-1
75.80 79.75 88.31 97.16 Strong Dem - 7.53 rank 5
81 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
75.91 65.82 94.93 94.21 Strong Dem - 7.42 rank 5
82 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
75.95 75.95 96.84 96.84 Strong Dem - 7.38 rank 5
83 Heck, Denny D
WA-10
76.32 84.62 93.81 97.82 Strong Dem - 7.01 rank 5
84 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.65 78.95 88.43 97.30 Strong Dem - 6.68 rank 5
85 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
70.13 70.13 95.83 95.83 Swing - 6.54 rank 5
86 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
77.38 75.95 96.50 96.40 Strong Dem - 5.95 rank 5
87 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
70.89 70.89 95.85 95.85 Swing - 5.78 rank 5
88 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
70.89 70.89 93.37 93.37 Swing - 5.78 rank 5
89 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.83 78.48 89.27 97.16 Strong Dem - 5.50 rank 5
90 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
78.07 79.75 91.46 96.82 Strong Dem - 5.26 rank 5
91 Green, Al D
TX-9
78.16 92.41 92.73 99.00 Strong Dem - 5.17 rank 5
92 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
78.17 92.41 94.18 98.98 Strong Dem - 5.16 rank 5
93 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.21 82.28 92.29 97.50 Strong Dem - 5.12 rank 5
94 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.28 87.34 93.03 98.33 Strong Dem - 5.05 rank 5
95 Richmond, Cedric D
LA-2
78.42 82.89 92.54 96.83 Strong Dem - 4.91 rank 5
96 Trone, David D
MD-6
78.48 78.48 96.66 96.66 Strong Dem - 4.85 rank 5
97 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.95 75.95 86.25 95.70 Swing - 4.72 rank 5
98 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.68 82.05 92.67 97.12 Strong Dem - 4.65 rank 5
99 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
78.73 85.90 94.15 97.93 Strong Dem - 4.60 rank 5
100 Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
72.15 72.15 96.17 96.17 Swing - 4.52 rank 5
101 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
79.26 91.14 95.10 98.50 Strong Dem - 4.07 rank 5
102 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.37 75.95 95.64 96.67 Strong Dem - 3.96 rank 5
103 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
76.10 83.54 93.46 97.65 Leaning Dem - 3.90 rank 5
104 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
79.46 84.81 95.74 97.84 Strong Dem - 3.87 rank 5
105 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.47 87.18 95.25 98.00 Strong Dem - 3.86 rank 5
106 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
79.55 81.01 95.79 97.31 Strong Dem - 3.78 rank 5
107 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.54 82.28 93.20 97.68 Leaning Dem - 3.46 rank 5
108 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
73.42 73.42 96.35 96.35 Swing - 3.25 rank 5
109 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
80.18 88.46 95.78 98.34 Strong Dem - 3.15 rank 5
110 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
80.36 84.81 95.86 97.82 Strong Dem - 2.97 rank 5
111 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.55 79.49 94.09 97.30 Strong Dem - 2.78 rank 5
112 Mucarsel-Powell, Debbie D
FL-26
77.22 77.22 96.83 96.83 Leaning Dem - 2.78 rank 5
113 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
80.72 84.81 93.61 97.82 Strong Dem - 2.61 rank 5
114 Price, David D
NC-4
80.74 88.61 90.85 98.34 Strong Dem - 2.59 rank 5
115 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.83 87.34 90.67 98.16 Strong Dem - 2.50 rank 5
116 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
80.99 94.87 94.51 98.81 Strong Dem - 2.34 rank 5
117 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
81.01 81.01 97.50 97.50 Strong Dem - 2.32 rank 5
118 Lujan, Ben D
NM-3
81.11 88.61 93.94 98.50 Strong Dem - 2.22 rank 5
119 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
81.14 82.67 94.79 97.37 Strong Dem - 2.19 rank 5
120 Davis, Susan D
CA-53
81.33 81.01 92.60 97.48 Strong Dem - 2.00 rank 5
121 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.15 80.82 92.15 97.18 Leaning Dem - 1.85 rank 5
122 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
78.48 78.48 97.01 97.01 Leaning Dem - 1.52 rank 5
123 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.09 74.68 91.15 96.34 Strong Dem - 1.24 rank 5
124 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.21 81.01 93.95 97.10 Strong Dem - 1.12 rank 5
125 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.24 84.42 91.16 97.77 Strong Dem - 1.09 rank 5
126 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.26 84.81 91.06 97.99 Strong Dem - 1.07 rank 5
127 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.41 84.81 92.12 97.96 Strong Dem - 0.92 rank 5
128 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
82.93 86.08 92.90 98.17 Strong Dem - 0.40 rank 5
129 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
79.75 79.75 97.35 97.35 Leaning Dem - 0.25 rank 5
130 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.19 88.61 92.17 98.43 Strong Dem - 0.14 rank 5
131 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.20 85.90 94.23 97.98 Strong Dem - 0.13 rank 5
132 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
83.38 88.46 95.97 98.32 Strong Dem + 0.05 rank 5
133 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.08 77.22 92.21 96.67 Leaning Dem + 0.08 rank 5
134 Shalala, Donna D
FL-27
83.54 83.54 97.67 97.67 Strong Dem + 0.21 rank 5
135 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.01 81.82 91.60 97.62 Strong Dem + 0.68 rank 5
136 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
84.20 96.05 95.39 99.32 Strong Dem + 0.87 rank 5
137 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.31 88.61 94.82 98.33 Strong Dem + 0.98 rank 5
138 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
84.82 88.61 95.42 98.43 Strong Dem + 1.49 rank 5
139 Lowey, Nita D
NY-17
85.00 82.28 92.15 97.63 Strong Dem + 1.67 rank 5
140 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
85.12 93.59 96.31 98.96 Strong Dem + 1.79 rank 5
141 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.17 84.62 94.52 97.58 Strong Dem + 1.84 rank 5
142 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.20 88.61 95.05 97.99 Strong Dem + 1.87 rank 5
143 Engel, Eliot D
NY-16
85.42 92.41 91.99 98.84 Strong Dem + 2.09 rank 5
144 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.48 83.54 95.73 97.58 Strong Dem + 2.15 rank 5
145 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.52 79.75 92.35 97.01 Strong Dem + 2.19 rank 5
146 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.59 79.75 93.19 97.32 Strong Dem + 2.26 rank 5
147 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.96 84.81 95.14 97.81 Strong Dem + 2.63 rank 5
148 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
85.97 87.34 92.86 98.32 Strong Dem + 2.64 rank 5
149 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.05 96.20 92.16 99.50 Strong Dem + 2.72 rank 5
150 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.17 86.84 95.31 98.12 Strong Dem + 2.84 rank 5
151 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.53 91.03 95.89 98.32 Strong Dem + 3.20 rank 5
152 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.68 97.47 92.82 99.67 Strong Dem + 3.35 rank 5
153 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.83 89.87 92.96 98.64 Strong Dem + 3.50 rank 5
154 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.94 84.93 93.21 97.73 Strong Dem + 3.61 rank 5
155 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.17 92.41 96.01 98.84 Strong Dem + 3.84 rank 5
156 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
87.19 100.00 96.14 99.66 Strong Dem + 3.86 rank 5
157 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.33 84.93 96.82 98.10 Strong Dem + 4.00 rank 5
158 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.41 88.61 92.56 98.14 Strong Dem + 4.08 rank 5
159 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.45 94.94 93.31 99.17 Strong Dem + 4.12 rank 5
160 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.71 94.94 92.63 98.63 Strong Dem + 4.38 rank 5
161 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
87.80 86.08 96.77 97.94 Strong Dem + 4.47 rank 5
162 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.88 83.54 93.56 97.78 Strong Dem + 4.55 rank 5
163 Clay, William D
MO-1
87.97 89.74 94.83 98.63 Strong Dem + 4.64 rank 5
164 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
88.03 92.31 96.94 98.82 Strong Dem + 4.70 rank 5
165 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.35 78.08 95.73 97.13 Strong Dem + 5.02 rank 5
166 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
88.61 88.61 98.50 98.50 Strong Dem + 5.28 rank 5
167 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
88.95 87.34 97.03 98.32 Strong Dem + 5.62 rank 5
168 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.96 88.61 95.09 98.18 Strong Dem + 5.63 rank 5
169 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.11 91.14 93.94 98.64 Strong Dem + 5.78 rank 5
170 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
85.90 85.90 98.14 98.14 Leaning Dem + 5.90 rank 5
171 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
89.29 88.61 98.38 98.50 Strong Dem + 5.96 rank 5
172 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
89.33 92.41 97.57 98.98 Strong Dem + 6.00 rank 5
173 Fudge, Marcia D
OH-11
89.40 76.06 96.24 96.95 Strong Dem + 6.07 rank 5
174 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.46 91.14 96.07 98.82 Strong Dem + 6.13 rank 5
175 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.88 94.94 90.60 98.82 Swing + 6.21 rank 5
176 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
89.66 86.67 93.32 97.06 Strong Dem + 6.33 rank 5
177 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.70 98.73 94.06 99.16 Strong Dem + 6.37 rank 5
178 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.75 87.34 96.78 98.17 Strong Dem + 6.42 rank 5
179 Haaland, Debra D
NM-1
89.87 89.87 98.67 98.67 Strong Dem + 6.54 rank 5
180 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.91 92.41 96.11 98.49 Strong Dem + 6.58 rank 5
181 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.17 91.14 96.87 98.84 Strong Dem + 6.84 rank 5
182 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.19 88.61 96.38 98.50 Strong Dem + 6.86 rank 5
183 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.47 88.61 96.50 98.33 Strong Dem + 7.14 rank 5
184 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.65 96.20 96.70 99.33 Strong Dem + 7.32 rank 5
185 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.74 94.94 94.93 99.33 Strong Dem + 7.41 rank 5
186 Kennedy, Joe D
MA-4
91.14 96.20 97.06 99.33 Strong Dem + 7.81 rank 5
187 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
91.14 91.14 97.35 97.35 Strong Dem + 7.81 rank 5
188 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
91.14 91.14 98.49 98.49 Strong Dem + 7.81 rank 5
189 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
91.85 85.53 97.15 97.83 Strong Dem + 8.52 rank 5
190 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.17 89.87 97.28 98.50 Strong Dem + 8.84 rank 5
191 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
92.27 98.72 97.79 99.66 Strong Dem + 8.94 rank 5
192 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.40 98.73 97.19 99.83 Strong Dem + 9.07 rank 5
193 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
92.41 92.41 96.77 96.77 Strong Dem + 9.08 rank 5
194 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
89.18 94.94 96.62 99.17 Leaning Dem + 9.18 rank 5
195 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.53 89.87 95.80 98.50 Strong Dem + 9.20 rank 5
196 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.59 77.22 95.04 96.74 Leaning Rep + 9.26 rank 5
197 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.96 92.31 95.74 98.83 Strong Dem + 9.63 rank 5
198 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.11 96.20 96.04 99.50 Strong Dem + 9.78 rank 5
199 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.12 93.67 97.08 98.66 Strong Dem + 9.79 rank 5
200 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.15 92.41 97.28 99.00 Strong Dem + 9.82 rank 5
201 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
93.20 93.67 97.83 98.64 Strong Dem + 9.87 rank 5
202 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.33 84.62 95.56 97.99 Strong Dem + 10.00 rank 5
203 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.44 94.94 97.99 98.98 Strong Dem + 10.11 rank 5
204 Serrano, José D
NY-15
93.49 83.12 95.67 97.56 Strong Dem + 10.16 rank 5
205 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.65 100.00 94.94 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.32 rank 5
206 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
93.67 93.67 99.00 99.00 Strong Dem + 10.34 rank 5
207 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.22 96.20 97.43 99.30 Strong Dem + 10.89 rank 5
208 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.81 87.01 97.27 98.31 Strong Dem + 11.48 rank 5
209 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
94.94 94.94 97.34 97.34 Strong Dem + 11.61 rank 5
210 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
94.94 94.94 96.35 96.35 Strong Dem + 11.61 rank 5
211 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
94.94 94.94 98.84 98.84 Strong Dem + 11.61 rank 5
212 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.97 94.87 96.74 99.15 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
213 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.25 100.00 97.48 99.33 Strong Dem + 11.92 rank 5
214 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.25 100.00 98.20 99.67 Strong Dem + 11.92 rank 5
215 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.51 94.94 98.84 99.17 Strong Dem + 12.18 rank 5
216 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.68 97.44 96.90 99.50 Strong Dem + 12.35 rank 5
217 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.02 98.73 98.20 99.16 Strong Dem + 12.69 rank 5
218 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.20 96.20 97.65 97.65 Strong Dem + 12.87 rank 5
219 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.41 96.15 99.22 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.08 rank 5
220 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.44 94.87 98.05 98.81 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
221 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.48 98.72 98.70 99.67 Strong Dem + 13.15 rank 5
222 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.57 97.47 98.12 99.50 Strong Dem + 13.24 rank 5
223 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.62 94.94 98.76 99.33 Strong Dem + 13.29 rank 5
224 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.74 98.73 97.38 99.67 Strong Dem + 13.41 rank 5
225 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.83 96.20 98.24 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.50 rank 5
226 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.86 96.20 99.02 99.00 Strong Dem + 13.53 rank 5
227 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
97.47 97.47 99.33 99.33 Strong Dem + 14.14 rank 5
228 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
97.87 96.20 99.00 99.50 Strong Dem + 14.54 rank 5
229 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
98.21 98.73 98.88 99.50 Strong Dem + 14.88 rank 5
230 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.66 97.47 99.16 99.00 Strong Dem + 15.33 rank 5
231 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
99.10 98.72 99.16 99.67 Strong Dem + 15.77 rank 5
232 Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.83 99.83 Leaning Dem + 20.00 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)