What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2019-20 Lifetime 2019-20 % Rating
1TIE Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.71 99.71 Leaning Dem + 20.00 rank 5
1TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
100.00 100.00 99.42 99.42 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
100.00 100.00 97.10 97.10 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
100.00 100.00 97.96 97.96 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
100.00 100.00 98.55 98.55 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
6 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.93 97.62 98.98 99.42 Strong Dem + 15.60 rank 5
7 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.93 100.00 99.19 99.13 Strong Dem + 15.60 rank 5
8 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
98.53 100.00 99.02 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.20 rank 5
9 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.87 97.67 98.63 99.13 Strong Dem + 14.54 rank 5
10TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
97.67 97.67 99.42 99.42 Strong Dem + 14.34 rank 5
10TIE Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.67 97.67 97.34 97.34 Strong Dem + 14.34 rank 5
12 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
97.34 100.00 99.40 99.71 Strong Dem + 14.01 rank 5
13 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
97.33 97.67 99.14 99.42 Strong Dem + 14.00 rank 5
14 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
97.03 97.67 98.75 99.71 Strong Dem + 13.70 rank 5
15 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.81 95.35 98.19 99.13 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
16 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.71 97.67 97.31 99.42 Strong Dem + 13.38 rank 5
17 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.60 100.00 98.09 99.71 Strong Dem + 13.27 rank 5
18 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.53 97.67 98.04 99.12 Strong Dem + 13.20 rank 5
19 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
95.99 100.00 98.18 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.66 rank 5
20 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.71 97.62 98.34 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.38 rank 5
21 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.67 97.67 96.84 99.41 Strong Dem + 12.34 rank 5
22TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.35 95.35 99.13 99.13 Strong Dem + 12.02 rank 5
22TIE Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.35 95.35 99.42 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.02 rank 5
24 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.19 100.00 97.42 99.13 Strong Dem + 11.86 rank 5
25 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.04 90.70 98.70 98.55 Strong Dem + 11.71 rank 5
26 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
95.00 97.67 96.69 99.42 Strong Dem + 11.67 rank 5
27 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
94.96 100.00 98.08 99.71 Strong Dem + 11.63 rank 5
28 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.92 85.71 97.23 98.22 Strong Dem + 11.59 rank 5
29 Lewis, John1 D
GA-5
94.89 93.02 96.68 99.13 Strong Dem + 11.56 rank 5
30 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.21 97.67 97.31 99.39 Strong Dem + 10.88 rank 5
31 Serrano, José D
NY-15
93.69 93.02 95.68 99.13 Strong Dem + 10.36 rank 5
32 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.64 100.00 94.93 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.31 rank 5
33 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.53 95.24 95.55 99.42 Strong Dem + 10.20 rank 5
34 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.38 95.35 97.93 99.13 Strong Dem + 10.05 rank 5
35 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.29 95.35 97.22 99.42 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
36 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.22 97.67 97.03 98.84 Strong Dem + 9.89 rank 5
37 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.10 97.67 95.95 99.71 Strong Dem + 9.77 rank 5
38 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
93.02 93.02 96.52 96.52 Strong Dem + 9.69 rank 5
39 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
92.95 90.70 97.72 98.25 Strong Dem + 9.62 rank 5
40 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.92 88.37 95.65 98.25 Strong Dem + 9.59 rank 5
41 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.66 95.35 95.74 99.13 Strong Dem + 9.33 rank 5
42 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
92.41 87.50 97.11 98.08 Strong Dem + 9.08 rank 5
43 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.20 88.37 97.14 98.25 Strong Dem + 8.87 rank 5
44 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.16 100.00 97.01 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.83 rank 5
45 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
91.67 90.70 98.61 98.84 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
46 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
91.35 100.00 97.49 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.02 rank 5
47 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.83 95.35 96.45 99.13 Strong Dem + 7.50 rank 5
48 Kennedy, Joe D
MA-4
90.75 95.35 96.88 99.42 Strong Dem + 7.42 rank 5
49 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.73 97.67 94.82 99.71 Strong Dem + 7.40 rank 5
50TIE Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
90.70 90.70 98.84 98.84 Strong Dem + 7.37 rank 5
50TIE Haaland, Debra D
NM-1
90.70 90.70 98.84 98.84 Strong Dem + 7.37 rank 5
52 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.44 95.35 96.56 99.13 Strong Dem + 7.11 rank 5
53 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.28 90.70 96.31 98.83 Strong Dem + 6.95 rank 5
54 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.07 90.70 96.70 98.84 Strong Dem + 6.74 rank 5
55 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.86 93.02 96.00 98.24 Strong Dem + 6.53 rank 5
56 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.85 88.37 96.72 98.26 Strong Dem + 6.52 rank 5
57 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
89.83 93.02 97.01 99.13 Strong Dem + 6.50 rank 5
58 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.58 97.67 93.91 99.12 Strong Dem + 6.25 rank 5
59 Fudge, Marcia D
OH-11
89.52 66.67 96.16 96.19 Strong Dem + 6.19 rank 5
60 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
89.42 95.35 97.40 99.42 Strong Dem + 6.09 rank 5
61 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.40 90.70 95.96 98.83 Strong Dem + 6.07 rank 5
62 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.08 90.70 93.81 98.52 Strong Dem + 5.75 rank 5
63 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.96 88.37 94.99 98.26 Strong Dem + 5.63 rank 5
64 Cummings, Elijah1 D
MD-7
88.92 90.70 93.90 98.44 Strong Dem + 5.59 rank 5
65 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.78 78.95 95.67 97.43 Strong Dem + 5.45 rank 5
66 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
88.68 93.02 96.37 98.84 Swing + 12.01 rank 5
67 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
88.56 90.70 96.72 98.50 Strong Dem + 5.23 rank 5
68 Shalala, Donna D
FL-27
88.37 88.37 98.26 98.26 Strong Dem + 5.04 rank 5
69 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
88.10 88.10 98.50 98.50 Leaning Dem + 8.10 rank 5
70 Clay, William D
MO-1
88.00 92.86 94.73 99.10 Strong Dem + 4.67 rank 5
71 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.95 86.05 93.47 98.18 Strong Dem + 4.62 rank 5
72 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.80 86.84 96.72 98.47 Strong Dem + 4.47 rank 5
73 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.64 95.35 92.48 98.80 Strong Dem + 4.31 rank 5
74 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.48 95.35 92.46 99.13 Strong Dem + 4.15 rank 5
75 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.41 97.67 93.19 99.71 Strong Dem + 4.08 rank 5
76 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
87.35 90.48 96.67 98.51 Strong Dem + 4.02 rank 5
77 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.05 93.02 95.89 98.84 Strong Dem + 3.72 rank 5
78 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.96 84.21 93.09 97.39 Strong Dem + 3.63 rank 5
79 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.81 90.70 92.83 98.82 Strong Dem + 3.48 rank 5
80 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.58 97.67 92.66 99.71 Strong Dem + 3.25 rank 5
81 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.46 92.86 95.81 98.83 Strong Dem + 3.13 rank 5
82 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
86.37 100.00 95.88 100.00 Strong Dem + 3.04 rank 5
83 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.29 90.48 95.20 98.53 Strong Dem + 2.96 rank 5
84 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
86.15 88.37 95.01 98.23 Strong Dem + 2.82 rank 5
85 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
86.05 86.05 98.26 98.26 Strong Dem + 2.72 rank 5
86 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.00 100.00 91.99 100.00 Strong Dem + 2.67 rank 5
87 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
85.96 88.37 92.73 98.53 Strong Dem + 2.63 rank 5
88 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.79 86.05 95.59 97.82 Strong Dem + 2.46 rank 5
89 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.78 86.05 93.10 98.26 Strong Dem + 2.45 rank 5
90 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.51 74.42 92.22 96.52 Strong Dem + 2.18 rank 5
91 Engel, Eliot D
NY-16
85.41 97.67 91.85 99.71 Strong Dem + 2.08 rank 5
92 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.17 90.70 94.92 98.25 Strong Dem + 1.84 rank 5
93 Lowey, Nita D
NY-17
85.10 88.37 92.06 98.53 Strong Dem + 1.77 rank 5
94 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.02 78.57 94.36 96.75 Strong Dem + 1.69 rank 5
95 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
84.76 97.67 96.13 99.71 Strong Dem + 1.43 rank 5
96 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
84.56 88.37 95.20 98.55 Strong Dem + 1.23 rank 5
97 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.26 90.70 94.67 98.54 Strong Dem + 0.93 rank 5
98 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.05 83.72 91.46 97.95 Strong Dem + 0.72 rank 5
99 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
84.02 97.67 95.87 99.42 Strong Dem + 0.69 rank 5
100TIE Levin, Mike D
CA-49
83.72 83.72 97.97 97.97 Leaning Dem + 3.72 rank 5
100TIE Mucarsel-Powell, Debbie D
FL-26
83.72 83.72 97.67 97.67 Strong Dem + 0.39 rank 5
102 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
83.54 97.50 95.05 99.39 Strong Dem + 0.21 rank 5
103 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.20 88.10 94.05 98.21 Strong Dem - 0.13 rank 5
104 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.11 88.37 91.98 98.43 Strong Dem - 0.22 rank 5
105 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
83.07 79.07 94.97 97.32 Leaning Rep + 9.74 rank 5
106 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
82.92 88.37 92.75 98.55 Strong Dem - 0.41 rank 5
107 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.79 97.67 90.41 99.41 Swing + 6.12 rank 5
108 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.44 88.37 91.98 98.55 Strong Dem - 0.89 rank 5
109 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.25 81.40 93.83 97.06 Strong Dem - 1.08 rank 5
110 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.24 85.71 91.02 97.94 Strong Dem - 1.09 rank 5
111 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.19 81.40 90.85 97.65 Strong Dem - 1.14 rank 5
112 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.15 74.42 91.04 96.42 Strong Dem - 1.18 rank 5
113 Davis, Susan D
CA-53
81.48 88.37 92.49 98.53 Strong Dem - 1.85 rank 5
114 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
81.40 81.40 97.68 97.68 Swing + 4.73 rank 5
115 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
81.00 82.05 94.54 97.05 Strong Dem - 2.33 rank 5
116 Lujan, Ben D
NM-3
80.86 88.37 93.71 98.55 Strong Dem - 2.47 rank 5
117 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.77 88.37 90.47 98.54 Strong Dem - 2.56 rank 5
118 Price, David D
NC-4
80.75 95.35 90.68 99.13 Strong Dem - 2.58 rank 5
119 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.71 83.72 93.99 97.97 Strong Dem - 2.62 rank 5
120 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
80.52 83.72 93.34 97.63 Strong Dem - 2.81 rank 5
121 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
80.43 86.05 95.74 98.26 Strong Dem - 2.90 rank 5
122 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
80.32 88.37 95.54 98.23 Strong Dem - 3.01 rank 5
123 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
80.18 95.35 94.18 99.10 Strong Dem - 3.15 rank 5
124 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.16 79.07 92.07 96.81 Leaning Dem + 0.16 rank 5
125 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
79.89 74.42 95.52 95.89 Strong Dem - 3.44 rank 5
126 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.68 74.42 95.37 96.51 Strong Dem - 3.65 rank 5
127 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
79.56 92.86 95.36 98.84 Strong Dem - 3.77 rank 5
128 Trone, David D
MD-6
79.07 79.07 96.79 96.79 Strong Dem - 4.26 rank 5
129 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.06 90.48 95.01 98.54 Strong Dem - 4.27 rank 5
130 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.73 86.05 92.44 97.35 Strong Dem - 4.60 rank 5
131 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
78.72 86.05 95.32 97.97 Strong Dem - 4.61 rank 5
132 Richmond, Cedric D
LA-2
78.45 87.50 92.31 97.22 Strong Dem - 4.88 rank 5
133 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
78.43 88.10 93.85 98.17 Strong Dem - 4.90 rank 5
134 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.28 88.37 92.13 98.26 Strong Dem - 5.05 rank 5
135 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
78.24 93.02 94.69 98.54 Strong Dem - 5.09 rank 5
136 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.17 90.70 92.85 98.83 Strong Dem - 5.16 rank 5
137 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.17 84.21 92.00 97.65 Leaning Dem - 1.83 rank 5
138 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
77.98 76.74 91.25 96.20 Strong Dem - 5.35 rank 5
139 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.83 79.07 89.09 97.35 Strong Dem - 5.50 rank 5
140 Green, Al D
TX-9
77.80 90.70 92.47 98.84 Strong Dem - 5.53 rank 5
141 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
77.62 95.35 93.89 99.40 Strong Dem - 5.71 rank 5
142 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
77.08 74.42 96.40 96.23 Strong Dem - 6.25 rank 5
143 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
76.74 76.74 96.81 96.81 Strong Dem - 6.59 rank 5
144 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.59 75.61 88.21 97.06 Strong Dem - 6.74 rank 5
145 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.51 86.05 93.04 98.26 Leaning Dem - 3.49 rank 5
146 Heck, Denny D
WA-10
75.92 86.05 93.50 97.97 Strong Dem - 7.41 rank 5
147 Gabbard, Tulsi D
HI-2
75.86 64.52 92.64 95.35 Strong Dem - 7.47 rank 5
148 Visclosky, Peter D
IN-1
75.76 79.07 88.10 97.37 Strong Dem - 7.57 rank 5
149 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.31 90.70 90.03 97.97 Strong Dem - 8.02 rank 5
150 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
75.00 83.72 92.51 97.67 Leaning Dem - 5.00 rank 5
151 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
74.42 74.42 96.81 96.81 Strong Dem - 8.91 rank 5
152 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
73.56 88.37 93.85 98.53 Strong Dem - 9.77 rank 5
153 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.51 70.27 93.49 93.88 Strong Dem - 9.82 rank 5
154 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
73.49 88.37 93.02 98.55 Strong Dem - 9.84 rank 5
155 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.12 95.35 86.85 99.41 Strong Dem - 10.21 rank 5
156 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.03 81.40 91.06 97.58 Strong Dem - 10.30 rank 5
157 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
73.00 79.07 92.32 96.80 Strong Dem - 10.33 rank 5
158 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.21 92.86 86.55 98.81 Strong Dem - 11.12 rank 5
159TIE Hill, Katie D
CA-25
72.09 72.09 96.51 96.51 Leaning Dem - 7.91 rank 5
159TIE Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
72.09 72.09 96.52 96.52 Leaning Dem - 7.91 rank 5
159TIE Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
72.09 72.09 96.52 96.52 Strong Dem - 11.24 rank 5
162 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.94 79.07 86.02 96.20 Swing - 4.73 rank 5
163 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
71.74 69.77 95.21 95.01 Swing - 4.93 rank 5
164 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
71.63 81.40 91.21 96.78 Strong Dem - 11.70 rank 5
165 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
71.28 69.77 93.36 95.94 Strong Dem - 12.05 rank 5
166 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
70.98 79.07 89.74 96.77 Strong Dem - 12.35 rank 5
167 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
70.03 83.72 92.15 97.97 Strong Dem - 13.30 rank 5
168TIE Cisneros, Gil D
CA-39
69.77 69.77 95.94 95.94 Leaning Dem - 10.23 rank 5
168TIE Porter, Katie D
CA-45
69.77 69.77 95.06 95.06 Leaning Dem - 10.23 rank 5
168TIE Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
69.77 69.77 96.23 96.23 Leaning Dem - 10.23 rank 5
171 Loebsack, Dave D
IA-2
68.16 67.44 90.83 95.88 Swing - 8.51 rank 5
172 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.13 83.72 88.03 97.67 Strong Dem - 15.20 rank 5
173 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
67.50 66.67 89.60 95.27 Strong Dem - 15.83 rank 5
174TIE Cox, T. J. D
CA-21
67.44 67.44 95.07 95.07 Strong Dem - 15.89 rank 5
174TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
67.44 67.44 95.36 95.36 Leaning Dem - 12.56 rank 5
174TIE Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
67.44 67.44 91.59 91.59 Swing - 9.23 rank 5
174TIE Rouda, Harley D
CA-48
67.44 67.44 95.54 95.54 Leaning Dem - 12.56 rank 5
174TIE Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
67.44 67.44 95.35 95.35 Swing - 9.23 rank 5
179 Case, Ed D
HI-1
67.34 67.44 80.26 95.65 Strong Dem - 15.99 rank 5
180 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
67.03 83.72 92.57 97.97 Strong Dem - 16.30 rank 5
181 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
66.96 81.40 91.20 97.66 Leaning Dem - 13.04 rank 5
182 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
66.74 79.07 89.10 97.38 Strong Dem - 16.59 rank 5
183 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
66.67 66.67 94.63 94.63 Leaning Dem - 13.33 rank 5
184 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.30 78.57 87.81 96.79 Strong Dem - 17.03 rank 5
185 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
65.03 83.72 89.77 97.97 Strong Dem - 18.30 rank 5
186 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
64.29 64.29 93.88 93.88 Leaning Dem - 15.71 rank 5
187 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
64.24 86.05 90.69 98.26 Strong Dem - 19.09 rank 5
188 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
63.41 63.41 95.03 95.03 Swing - 13.26 rank 5
189 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
63.24 69.77 91.87 95.24 Strong Dem - 20.09 rank 5
190TIE Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
62.79 62.79 94.78 94.78 Leaning Dem - 17.21 rank 5
190TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
62.79 62.79 95.06 95.06 Swing - 13.88 rank 5
190TIE Rose, Max D
NY-11
62.79 62.79 93.77 93.77 Leaning Rep - 10.54 rank 5
193 González, Vicente D
TX-15
62.77 76.74 87.87 93.11 Strong Dem - 20.56 rank 5
194 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
61.17 86.05 89.43 97.62 Strong Dem - 22.16 rank 5
195 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.47 70.73 82.65 95.28 Leaning Dem - 19.53 rank 5
196TIE Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
60.47 60.47 94.49 94.49 Leaning Rep - 12.86 rank 5
196TIE Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
60.47 60.47 94.20 94.20 Leaning Dem - 19.53 rank 5
198 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.02 81.40 78.83 96.17 Leaning Dem - 20.98 rank 5
199 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
58.94 81.40 91.06 97.39 Strong Dem - 24.39 rank 5
200 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
58.14 58.14 94.20 94.20 Swing - 18.53 rank 5
201 Lipinski, Daniel D
IL-3
57.96 67.44 84.34 92.65 Strong Dem - 25.37 rank 5
202 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
57.52 88.37 85.45 95.64 Strong Dem - 25.81 rank 5
203 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
57.07 74.42 88.99 96.22 Leaning Dem - 22.93 rank 5
204 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
56.76 67.44 89.64 95.65 Leaning Dem - 23.24 rank 5
205 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
56.69 74.42 78.89 93.62 Strong Dem - 26.64 rank 5
206 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
55.26 76.74 85.49 97.10 Strong Dem - 28.07 rank 5
207 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
54.88 88.37 87.60 98.55 Strong Dem - 28.45 rank 5
208 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
54.84 67.44 89.81 95.61 Strong Dem - 28.49 rank 5
209 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
54.28 81.40 87.53 97.68 Leaning Dem - 25.72 rank 5
210 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
53.49 53.49 93.62 93.62 Leaning Rep - 19.84 rank 5
211 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
53.38 81.40 81.94 97.20 Leaning Dem - 26.62 rank 5
212 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
52.63 67.44 87.78 95.94 Swing - 24.04 rank 5
213 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
51.83 62.79 84.30 94.46 Strong Dem - 31.50 rank 5
214 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
51.61 44.19 83.12 88.99 Swing - 25.06 rank 5
215TIE Finkenauer, Abby D
IA-1
51.16 51.16 93.33 93.33 Swing - 25.51 rank 5
215TIE Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
51.16 51.16 93.31 93.31 Leaning Dem - 28.84 rank 5
217 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
50.18 74.42 86.18 95.91 Swing - 26.49 rank 5
218 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
47.59 65.12 85.26 95.35 Swing - 29.08 rank 5
219 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
47.06 53.49 85.04 92.75 Leaning Dem - 32.94 rank 5
220 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
44.19 44.19 91.30 91.30 Swing - 32.48 rank 5
221 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
43.57 69.77 73.43 92.73 Strong Dem - 39.76 rank 5
222 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
41.86 41.86 91.01 91.01 Leaning Rep - 31.47 rank 5
223 Torres Small, Xochitl D
NM-2
39.53 39.53 90.09 90.09 Leaning Rep - 33.80 rank 5
224 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
39.17 58.14 73.53 88.70 Strong Dem - 44.16 rank 5
225 Peterson, Collin D
MN-7
39.08 34.88 60.23 77.13 Strong Rep - 30.92 rank 5
226 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
37.97 25.58 80.05 86.88 Swing - 38.70 rank 5
227TIE Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
37.21 37.21 89.88 89.88 Swing - 39.46 rank 5
227TIE Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
37.21 37.21 87.54 87.54 Swing - 39.46 rank 5
227TIE Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
37.21 37.21 89.53 89.53 Swing - 39.46 rank 5
231TIE Golden, Jared D
ME-2
32.56 32.56 86.96 86.96 Leaning Rep - 40.77 rank 5
231TIE McAdams, Ben D
UT-4
32.56 32.56 84.35 84.35 Strong Rep - 37.44 rank 5
233 Horn, Kendra D
OK-5
30.23 30.23 88.70 88.70 Strong Rep - 39.77 rank 5
237TIE Brindisi, Anthony D
NY-22
20.93 20.93 84.30 84.30 Strong Rep - 49.07 rank 5
237TIE Cunningham, Joe D
SC-1
20.93 20.93 82.32 82.32 Strong Rep - 49.07 rank 5
237TIE Van Drew, Jeff D
NJ-2
20.93 20.93 83.19 83.19 Swing - 55.74 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)