What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2025-26 Lifetime 2025-26 % Rating
1TIE Dexter, Maxine D
OR-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.41 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE McIver, LaMonica D
NJ-10
100.00 100.00 99.37 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
4 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.34 100.00 98.70 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.01 rank 5
5 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
99.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.79 rank 5
6 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
99.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.79 rank 5
7 Rivas, Luz D
CA-29
98.73 98.73 99.15 99.15 Strong Dem + 15.40 rank 5
8TIE Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.68 100.00 98.91 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.35 rank 5
8TIE Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
98.68 100.00 98.02 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.35 rank 5
10 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.58 100.00 98.35 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.25 rank 5
11 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.14 100.00 99.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.81 rank 5
12 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
97.94 97.50 98.42 98.32 Strong Dem + 14.61 rank 5
13 Ansari, Yassamin D
AZ-3
97.47 97.47 98.26 98.26 Strong Dem + 14.14 rank 5
14 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.37 98.75 97.64 99.15 Strong Dem + 14.04 rank 5
15 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.37 96.15 98.48 97.44 Strong Dem + 14.04 rank 5
16 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.24 96.25 97.77 97.41 Strong Dem + 13.91 rank 5
17 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.24 98.75 98.13 99.16 Strong Dem + 13.91 rank 5
18 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.23 98.75 97.78 99.14 Strong Dem + 13.90 rank 5
19 Watson Coleman, Bonnie 1 D
NJ-12
97.17 100.00 98.68 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.84 rank 5
20 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.07 97.47 97.68 98.26 Strong Dem + 13.74 rank 5
21 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
96.90 98.73 96.90 99.16 Strong Dem + 13.57 rank 5
22 Clarke, Yvette 1 D
NY-9
96.87 98.73 98.35 99.14 Strong Dem + 13.54 rank 5
23 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.80 98.75 98.20 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.47 rank 5
24 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.80 98.73 98.19 99.16 Strong Dem + 13.47 rank 5
25 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.79 96.25 98.10 97.50 Strong Dem + 13.46 rank 5
26 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.70 98.75 96.33 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.37 rank 5
27 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
96.69 98.75 98.06 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.36 rank 5
28 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.59 98.75 98.18 99.15 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
29 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
96.52 100.00 97.44 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.19 rank 5
30 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.52 98.75 96.72 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.19 rank 5
31 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
96.40 98.72 97.54 99.13 Strong Dem + 13.07 rank 5
32 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
96.31 98.75 95.91 99.17 Strong Dem + 12.98 rank 5
33 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
96.23 96.20 97.36 97.35 Strong Dem + 12.90 rank 5
34 Simon, Lateefah D
CA-12
96.15 96.15 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 12.82 rank 5
35 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.06 90.79 98.68 93.75 Strong Dem + 12.73 rank 5
36 Randall, Emily D
WA-6
96.05 96.05 97.35 97.35 Strong Dem + 12.72 rank 5
37 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.05 98.73 96.67 99.14 Strong Dem + 12.72 rank 5
38 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.96 97.47 97.71 98.28 Strong Dem + 12.63 rank 5
39 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.96 98.73 98.20 99.15 Strong Dem + 12.63 rank 5
40 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.81 100.00 97.16 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.48 rank 5
41 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.74 97.50 97.22 98.33 Strong Dem + 12.41 rank 5
42 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.71 98.73 97.48 99.16 Strong Dem + 12.38 rank 5
43 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.59 95.00 95.42 96.64 Strong Dem + 12.26 rank 5
44 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
95.56 97.47 96.16 98.32 Strong Dem + 12.23 rank 5
45 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.54 97.47 97.94 98.32 Strong Dem + 12.21 rank 5
46 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.52 92.31 97.79 94.64 Strong Dem + 12.19 rank 5
47 Bonamici, Suzanne 1 D
OR-1
95.47 100.00 97.64 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.14 rank 5
48 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
95.31 95.00 94.69 96.67 Strong Dem + 11.98 rank 5
49 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.20 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.87 rank 5
50 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
95.18 98.73 97.16 99.16 Strong Dem + 11.85 rank 5
51 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.08 100.00 97.23 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
52 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.03 93.51 97.20 95.61 Strong Dem + 11.70 rank 5
53TIE Bell, Wesley D
MO-1
95.00 95.00 95.83 95.83 Strong Dem + 11.67 rank 5
53TIE Liccardo, Sam D
CA-16
95.00 95.00 96.67 96.67 Strong Dem + 11.67 rank 5
55 Friedman, Laura D
CA-30
94.94 94.94 96.64 96.64 Strong Dem + 11.61 rank 5
56 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.89 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.56 rank 5
57 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
94.67 92.11 95.98 93.69 Strong Dem + 11.34 rank 5
58 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
94.64 98.75 97.28 99.16 Strong Dem + 11.31 rank 5
59 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.62 90.79 95.98 93.64 Leans Dem + 14.62 rank 5
60 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.49 100.00 97.64 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.16 rank 5
61 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
94.10 98.70 97.25 99.11 Strong Dem + 10.77 rank 5
62 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
94.04 93.75 95.31 95.80 Strong Dem + 10.71 rank 5
63 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.92 98.75 96.95 99.17 Strong Dem + 10.59 rank 5
64 Morrison, Kelly D
MN-3
93.75 93.75 95.80 95.80 Strong Dem + 10.42 rank 5
65 Mullin, Kevin 1 D
CA-15
93.67 98.55 94.83 99.01 Strong Dem + 10.34 rank 5
66 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
93.45 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.12 rank 5
67 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.40 98.73 97.08 99.14 Strong Dem + 10.07 rank 5
68 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
93.38 97.50 94.32 98.33 Strong Dem + 10.05 rank 5
69 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.28 100.00 96.33 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.95 rank 5
70 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.28 94.87 95.24 95.73 Strong Dem + 9.95 rank 5
71 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.23 96.20 96.02 97.44 Strong Dem + 9.90 rank 5
72 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.07 93.75 95.28 95.83 Strong Dem + 9.74 rank 5
73 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
92.94 93.67 93.86 95.80 Strong Dem + 9.61 rank 5
74 Pelosi, Nancy 1 2 D
CA-11
92.91 97.22 94.85 98.04 Strong Dem + 9.58 rank 5
75 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
92.72 88.75 95.31 92.17 Strong Dem + 9.39 rank 5
76 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
92.55 98.75 96.24 99.15 Leans Dem + 12.55 rank 5
77 Olszewski, Johnny D
MD-2
92.50 92.50 95.00 95.00 Strong Dem + 9.17 rank 5
78 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.45 98.72 96.67 99.15 Strong Dem + 9.12 rank 5
79 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.22 97.50 96.46 98.33 Strong Dem + 8.89 rank 5
80 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.19 90.00 94.53 93.10 Strong Dem + 8.86 rank 5
81 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.13 92.50 94.76 95.00 Strong Dem + 8.80 rank 5
82 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.06 96.15 96.66 97.46 Strong Dem + 8.73 rank 5
83 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
91.61 86.25 94.53 90.76 Strong Dem + 8.28 rank 5
84 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.58 100.00 95.42 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.25 rank 5
85 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
91.57 98.75 96.13 99.17 Strong Dem + 8.24 rank 5
86 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.47 98.75 96.31 99.17 Strong Dem + 8.14 rank 5
87TIE Elfreth, Sarah D
MD-3
91.25 91.25 94.17 94.17 Strong Dem + 7.92 rank 5
87TIE Pou, Nellie D
NJ-9
91.25 91.25 94.17 94.17 Swing + 14.58 rank 5
89 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
91.20 98.75 96.35 99.15 Strong Dem + 7.87 rank 5
90 Latimer, George D
NY-16
91.14 91.14 94.12 94.12 Strong Dem + 7.81 rank 5
91 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
90.97 95.00 94.31 96.67 Strong Dem + 7.64 rank 5
92 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.91 95.00 95.76 96.67 Strong Dem + 7.58 rank 5
93 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.55 91.14 95.87 93.91 Strong Dem + 7.22 rank 5
94 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
90.53 91.25 92.58 94.17 Strong Dem + 7.20 rank 5
95 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.38 93.67 96.07 95.80 Strong Dem + 7.05 rank 5
96 Castro, Joaquin 1 D
TX-20
90.07 97.47 95.96 98.32 Strong Dem + 6.74 rank 5
97 Johnson, Julie D
TX-32
90.00 90.00 91.67 91.67 Strong Dem + 6.67 rank 5
98 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
89.91 96.20 95.88 97.48 Strong Dem + 6.58 rank 5
99 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.87 97.50 95.35 98.33 Strong Dem + 6.54 rank 5
100 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.74 84.93 95.60 88.57 Strong Dem + 6.41 rank 5
101 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.89 96.20 95.92 97.44 Strong Dem + 5.56 rank 5
102 McBride, Sarah D
DE-AL
88.75 88.75 92.50 92.50 Strong Dem + 5.42 rank 5
103 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.67 93.59 92.57 94.78 Strong Dem + 5.34 rank 5
104 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.58 84.93 95.28 89.81 Strong Dem + 5.25 rank 5
105 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
88.51 94.94 95.17 96.64 Strong Dem + 5.18 rank 5
106 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.45 100.00 93.34 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.12 rank 5
107 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
88.30 92.50 92.42 95.00 Strong Dem + 4.97 rank 5
108 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
88.23 96.25 95.13 97.50 Strong Dem + 4.90 rank 5
109 Carson, André D
IN-7
88.18 95.00 95.35 96.67 Strong Dem + 4.85 rank 5
110 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
88.02 91.14 94.57 94.12 Strong Dem + 4.69 rank 5
111 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.86 97.50 94.58 98.33 Strong Dem + 4.53 rank 5
112 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.84 95.00 93.75 96.67 Strong Dem + 4.51 rank 5
113 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.75 95.00 93.76 96.64 Strong Dem + 4.42 rank 5
114 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
87.65 94.94 93.02 96.61 Strong Dem + 4.32 rank 5
115 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.63 93.59 95.02 95.65 Leans Dem + 7.63 rank 5
116 Kennedy, Tim D
NY-26
87.37 88.75 92.35 92.50 Strong Dem + 4.04 rank 5
117 Conaway, Herb D
NJ-3
87.34 87.34 91.53 91.53 Strong Dem + 4.01 rank 5
118 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
87.17 96.25 94.84 97.50 Strong Dem + 3.84 rank 5
119 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
87.00 93.75 94.57 95.80 Strong Dem + 3.67 rank 5
120 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
86.72 88.61 93.95 92.24 Strong Dem + 3.39 rank 5
121 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.63 92.41 94.81 94.96 Strong Dem + 3.30 rank 5
122 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.47 89.61 93.33 92.92 Strong Dem + 3.14 rank 5
123 Min, Dave D
CA-47
86.25 86.25 89.08 89.08 Leans Dem + 6.25 rank 5
124 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.16 98.75 92.95 99.16 Strong Dem + 2.83 rank 5
125 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
86.09 93.67 94.36 95.80 Strong Dem + 2.76 rank 5
126 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.01 85.00 93.87 89.92 Strong Dem + 2.68 rank 5
127 Pettersen, Brittany 1 D
CO-7
85.85 91.38 90.97 93.59 Strong Dem + 2.52 rank 5
128 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.80 89.61 94.64 93.10 Strong Dem + 2.47 rank 5
129 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
85.69 83.75 93.90 89.17 Leans Dem + 5.69 rank 5
130 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
85.67 96.25 93.32 97.41 Strong Dem + 2.34 rank 5
131 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.56 91.25 93.42 93.97 Strong Dem + 2.23 rank 5
132 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
85.55 93.75 93.96 95.83 Strong Dem + 2.22 rank 5
133 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
85.18 84.81 90.70 89.92 Swing + 8.51 rank 5
134 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
85.05 100.00 94.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 1.72 rank 5
135TIE Bynum, Janelle D
OR-5
85.00 85.00 89.17 89.17 Strong Dem + 1.67 rank 5
135TIE Subramanyam, Suhas D
VA-10
85.00 85.00 90.00 90.00 Strong Dem + 1.67 rank 5
137 Fields, Cleo D
LA-6
84.69 93.67 90.09 95.80 Strong Dem + 1.36 rank 5
138 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
84.65 88.75 93.83 92.50 Leans Dem + 4.65 rank 5
139 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
84.30 98.75 91.79 98.33 Strong Dem + 0.97 rank 5
140 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.16 92.41 93.86 94.83 Leans Dem + 4.16 rank 5
141 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
84.11 90.00 93.67 93.22 Strong Dem + 0.78 rank 5
142 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
83.83 90.91 93.96 93.75 Strong Dem + 0.50 rank 5
143 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
83.82 96.25 94.06 97.46 Strong Dem + 0.49 rank 5
144 Figures, Shomari D
AL-2
83.75 83.75 88.24 88.24 Strong Dem + 0.42 rank 5
145 Garamendi, John 1 D
CA-8
83.48 92.21 93.09 94.29 Strong Dem + 0.15 rank 5
146 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
83.28 85.33 92.19 89.09 Strong Dem - 0.05 rank 5
147 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.24 97.50 91.96 98.31 Strong Dem - 0.09 rank 5
148 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.04 91.25 92.53 93.33 Strong Dem - 0.29 rank 5
149 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
83.04 93.42 93.42 95.54 Strong Dem - 0.29 rank 5
150 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.03 87.50 93.99 91.60 Leans Dem + 3.03 rank 5
151 Green, Al D
TX-9
82.95 98.75 93.49 98.29 Strong Dem - 0.38 rank 5
152 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.85 96.20 91.84 97.46 Strong Dem - 0.48 rank 5
153 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
82.73 94.87 91.64 96.52 Strong Dem - 0.60 rank 5
154 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
82.73 80.52 90.91 86.96 Leans Dem + 2.73 rank 5
155 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
82.58 88.75 89.90 92.50 Strong Dem - 0.75 rank 5
156TIE Goodlander, Maggie D
NH-2
82.50 82.50 87.50 87.50 Leans Dem + 2.50 rank 5
156TIE Mannion, John D
NY-22
82.50 82.50 87.50 87.50 Strong Dem - 0.83 rank 5
158 Norcross, Donald 1 D
NJ-1
82.15 90.70 93.61 93.85 Strong Dem - 1.18 rank 5
159 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
81.43 81.25 92.11 87.50 Leans Dem + 1.43 rank 5
160 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
81.39 77.92 92.01 85.34 Strong Dem - 1.94 rank 5
161 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.28 83.75 87.93 88.33 Strong Dem - 2.05 rank 5
162TIE McClain-Delaney, April D
MD-6
81.25 81.25 86.44 86.44 Strong Dem - 2.08 rank 5
162TIE Tran, Derek D
CA-45
81.25 81.25 87.50 87.50 Swing + 4.58 rank 5
164 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
81.11 81.01 92.35 87.39 Leans Dem + 1.11 rank 5
165 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
81.11 87.50 92.45 89.17 Strong Dem - 2.22 rank 5
166 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.08 89.74 91.78 91.53 Strong Dem - 2.25 rank 5
167 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
80.72 96.20 92.95 97.48 Strong Dem - 2.61 rank 5
168 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
80.23 85.00 92.10 89.17 Strong Dem - 3.10 rank 5
169 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
80.13 78.48 87.65 84.87 Strong Dem - 3.20 rank 5
170 McDonald Rivet, Kristen D
MI-8
80.00 80.00 80.83 80.83 Swing + 3.33 rank 5
171 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.80 87.50 93.12 91.67 Strong Dem - 3.53 rank 5
172 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
79.74 81.25 86.03 84.17 Swing + 3.07 rank 5
173 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
79.72 82.50 91.81 88.33 Strong Dem - 3.61 rank 5
174 Cisneros, Gil D
CA-31
78.95 93.75 95.20 95.83 Strong Dem - 4.38 rank 5
175 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
78.90 97.47 92.37 98.31 Strong Dem - 4.43 rank 5
176 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
78.84 81.25 86.27 87.50 Leans Dem - 1.16 rank 5
177 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
78.51 82.50 90.67 88.33 Leans Dem - 1.49 rank 5
178 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
78.46 78.75 86.80 85.71 Leans Dem - 1.54 rank 5
179 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
78.17 91.14 89.89 93.97 Strong Dem - 5.16 rank 5
180 Whitesides, George D
CA-27
77.92 77.92 83.19 83.19 Leans Dem - 2.08 rank 5
181 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
77.84 95.00 91.59 96.67 Strong Dem - 5.49 rank 5
182 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
77.69 91.25 91.02 94.02 Strong Dem - 5.64 rank 5
183 Vindman, Eugene D
VA-7
77.50 77.50 83.90 83.90 Leans Dem - 2.50 rank 5
184 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
77.30 78.75 89.61 85.00 Leans Dem - 2.70 rank 5
185 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
77.14 91.14 90.72 93.28 Strong Dem - 6.19 rank 5
186 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
76.55 76.25 89.96 81.67 Swing - 0.12 rank 5
187 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
76.50 77.50 84.48 82.50 Strong Dem - 6.83 rank 5
188 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
76.26 70.59 90.25 77.78 Strong Dem - 7.07 rank 5
189 Gray, Adam D
CA-13
76.25 76.25 73.33 73.33 Leans Rep + 2.92 rank 5
190 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.12 78.75 88.72 81.51 Leans Rep + 2.79 rank 5
191 González, Vicente D
TX-34
76.00 77.50 86.80 71.67 Leans Rep + 2.67 rank 5
192 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
75.89 98.72 88.76 99.15 Strong Dem - 7.44 rank 5
193 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
75.82 85.00 90.59 89.92 Strong Dem - 7.51 rank 5
194 Riley, Josh D
NY-19
75.64 75.64 83.62 83.62 Leans Dem - 4.36 rank 5
195 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
75.28 94.81 90.58 96.55 Leans Dem - 4.72 rank 5
196 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.24 91.14 86.70 91.60 Strong Dem - 8.09 rank 5
197 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
75.10 73.75 89.03 80.83 Swing - 1.57 rank 5
198 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
74.50 78.75 83.38 81.51 Swing - 2.17 rank 5
199 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
74.34 81.25 87.51 86.55 Strong Dem - 8.99 rank 5
200 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
73.91 83.54 88.97 89.08 Strong Dem - 9.42 rank 5
201 Gillen, Laura D
NY-4
73.75 73.75 75.83 75.83 Leans Dem - 6.25 rank 5
202 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
73.73 96.15 90.16 96.55 Strong Dem - 9.60 rank 5
203 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
72.70 73.75 89.49 75.83 Leans Rep - 0.63 rank 5
204 Scott, David D
GA-13
71.96 94.87 88.98 96.61 Strong Dem - 11.37 rank 5
205 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
70.70 76.25 69.32 66.10 Swing - 5.97 rank 5
206 Davis, Don D
NC-1
70.64 75.00 74.14 70.00 Swing - 6.03 rank 5
207 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
69.76 90.00 87.35 93.22 Strong Dem - 13.57 rank 5
208 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
64.83 75.00 77.32 68.33 Leans Rep - 8.50 rank 5
209 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
64.54 58.11 84.06 68.93 Leans Dem - 15.46 rank 5
210 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
61.28 86.08 81.10 87.07 Strong Dem - 22.05 rank 5
211 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
54.38 84.62 76.83 83.76 Leans Dem - 25.62 rank 5
212 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.63 73.75 75.36 65.00 Leans Rep - 23.70 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. District Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. District Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her district is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their districts. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their districts.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. District Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)