What: All Issues : Education, Humanities, & the Arts : General Education Funding : H.R. 2660. Fiscal 2004 Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations/Protest Vote Against Spending Bill Which Fails to Fully-Fund Education and Other Domestic Programs. (2003 house Roll Call 347)
 Who: All Members
[POW!]
 

To find out how your Members of Congress voted on this bill, use the form on the right.

H.R. 2660. Fiscal 2004 Labor-HHS-Education Appropriations/Protest Vote Against Spending Bill Which Fails to Fully-Fund Education and Other Domestic Programs.
house Roll Call 347     Jul 10, 2003
Progressive Position:
Yea
Progressive Result:
Loss

As originally proposed, the 2004 Labor-HHS-Education spending bill-which provides federal funding for a wide range of domestic purposes including labor protections, health and human services, and education-failed to fully-fund education as set forth in President Bush's No Child Left Behind Act. To alleviate funding shortfalls in education and other domestic priorities, Congressman Obey (D-WI) proposed an amendment which would have reduced the size of the Bush Administration's recently-enacted tax cuts-only as they applied to individuals earning in excess of $1 million-in order to increase funding for education and other programs in the Labor-HHS-Education spending bill. Under House budget rules, however, amendments to appropriations bills must be considered directly relevant to the legislation. During floor debate in the House chamber, Congressman Regula (R-OH) raised a point of order against the Obey amendment on the grounds that it was not germane (relevant) to the underlying spending bill. The objection was sustained and Obey's amendment was struck down. In response, Obey motioned to strike the enacting clause in the appropriations bill which, if passed, would have effectively killed the measure. The subject of this vote was Obey's motion to strike the enacting clause and kill the appropriations bill. Progressives voted in favor of the motion to strike based on their objections to the funding shortfalls in the underlying bill and their opposition to Republican budget priorities which, in the view of Progressives, placed the needs of wealthy individuals above those of children, workers, and the infirm. Evidence of their claim, Progressives argued, was President Bush's three rounds of tax cuts which had starved the government of revenue needed for elementary and secondary education, health services for the infirm, and other purposes. Despite support from Progressives, Obey's motion to strike the enacting clause of the appropriations bill was defeated 199-222.

Issue Areas:

Find your Member of
Congress' votes

Select by Name