What: All Issues : Health Care : Access to Health Insurance : On a motion to table (kill) an amendment that would have cut federal Medicaid funding for states where waste and fraud within Medicaid occurred (2010 senate Roll Call 104)
 Who: All Members
[POW!]
 

To find out how your Members of Congress voted on this bill, use the form on the right.

On a motion to table (kill) an amendment that would have cut federal Medicaid funding for states where waste and fraud within Medicaid occurred
senate Roll Call 104     Mar 25, 2010
Progressive Position:
Yea
Progressive Result:
Win

This was ostensibly a vote on a motion to table (kill) an amendment by Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) intended to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse within Medicaid – the government health insurance program for the poor. The measure Cornyn sought to amend was a “companion bill” making a number of changes to health care reform legislation already signed into law by President Obama. The underlying context was that Republicans were trying to attach amendments to the companion bill in order to send it back the House, where it had passed by a narrow margin. CNN reported that Republicans had chosen to offer a slew of amendments in order to “undermine the measure,” while the Associated Press characterized the amendments as “a final drive to thwart President Barack Obama's health care remake.”

Cornyn’s amendment would have cut federal Medicaid funding for states with a Medicaid “improper payment rate” of 10% of higher. The improper payment rate refers to percentage of a state’s Medicaid funding that was spent “improperly” – on waste, fraud, and abuse.  (For example, a state with a 10% improper payment rate would have spent 10% of its Medicaid funds improperly.)

Cornyn urged support for his amendment: “…This amendment will lower the deficit while attacking the scourge of fraud and waste in our Medicaid Program. The $3.4 trillion Medicaid Program is riddled with waste, fraud, and abuse, and improper repayment rates that range roughly in the 10-percent range for the nation.”

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) made a motion to table (kill) the amendment, saying: “I think it would be counterproductive, especially at a time when States are already struggling with their Medicaid Programs. I think it would be inappropriate for us to lay this arbitrary punitive measure on them.”

After the House and Senate both passed their respective health care reform bills, the two chambers had intended to reconcile those two bills into a final package. After the House and Senate passed that final package, it would have been sent to President Obama, who would have signed it into law. Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA), however, won a special election to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) before the final health care bill could be brought up for a vote. Brown's victory gave Republicans 41 votes in the Senate, leaving Democrats with 59 members – one vote short of the 60 votes they needed to defeat a unanimous Republican filibuster against the final health care bill. 

In order to pass comprehensive health care legislation without a 60-vote majority in the Senate, Democratic leaders devised a plan in which the House would pass the Senate health care bill (H.R. 3590), thereby enabling the president to sign it into law. The House would then pass a separate companion bill (H.R. 4872) to make changes to the Senate health measure under a process known as "budget reconciliation." Bills considered under budget reconciliation cannot be filibustered under Senate rules. This process allowed the House to make changes to Senate-passed health care legislation without sending the entire health bill back to the Senate, where it could have been filibustered indefinitely.   The companion bill incorporated changes to the Senate health care legislation desired by House Democrats. The House passed the companion measure, and sent it to the Senate, where Democratic leaders hoped to defeat all amendments -- thereby avoiding a second vote in the House on a substantively changed bill; a vote that Democrats might have lost given the already tight margin when it was voted on the previous week.  

The Senate voted to table (kill) the Cornyn amendment by a vote of 57-41. 57 Democrats voted “yea.” All 40 Republicans present and 1 Democrat voted “nay.” As a result, the Senate rejected an amendment Democratic leaders feared could have torpedoed the entire companion health care bill and would have cut federal Medicaid funding for states with a Medicaid “improper payment rate” of 10% of higher.

Issue Areas:

Find your Member of
Congress' votes

Select by Name