What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2019-20 Lifetime 2019-20 % Rating
1 Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.68 99.68 Leaning Dem + 20.00 rank 5
2 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
99.11 98.75 99.11 99.52 Strong Dem + 15.78 rank 5
3 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.66 97.53 99.17 99.05 Strong Dem + 15.33 rank 5
4 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
97.88 96.30 99.01 99.52 Strong Dem + 14.55 rank 5
5 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.79 97.53 98.76 99.21 Strong Dem + 14.46 rank 5
6 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
97.53 97.53 99.36 99.36 Strong Dem + 14.20 rank 5
7 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.89 96.30 98.97 98.89 Strong Dem + 13.56 rank 5
8 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.83 96.30 98.25 99.21 Strong Dem + 13.50 rank 5
9 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.75 98.77 97.38 99.52 Strong Dem + 13.42 rank 5
10 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.64 95.06 98.77 99.36 Strong Dem + 13.31 rank 5
11 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.58 97.53 98.13 99.52 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
12 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.52 98.75 98.65 99.52 Strong Dem + 13.19 rank 5
13 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.44 96.25 99.17 99.04 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
14 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.44 95.00 98.06 98.86 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
15 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.30 96.30 97.60 97.60 Strong Dem + 12.97 rank 5
16 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.03 98.77 98.21 99.20 Strong Dem + 12.70 rank 5
17 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.68 97.50 96.90 99.36 Strong Dem + 12.35 rank 5
18 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.54 95.06 98.85 99.21 Strong Dem + 12.21 rank 5
19 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.27 100.00 98.21 99.68 Strong Dem + 11.94 rank 5
20 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.25 100.00 97.49 99.36 Strong Dem + 11.92 rank 5
21TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.06 95.06 98.73 98.73 Strong Dem + 11.73 rank 5
21TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
95.06 95.06 96.35 96.35 Strong Dem + 11.73 rank 5
21TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
95.06 95.06 97.30 97.30 Strong Dem + 11.73 rank 5
24 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.97 95.00 96.73 99.03 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
25 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.81 87.34 97.28 98.38 Strong Dem + 11.48 rank 5
26 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.22 96.25 97.44 99.33 Strong Dem + 10.89 rank 5
27 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
93.83 93.83 99.05 99.05 Strong Dem + 10.50 rank 5
28 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.65 100.00 94.94 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.32 rank 5
29 Serrano, José D
NY-15
93.49 83.54 95.68 97.68 Strong Dem + 10.16 rank 5
30 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.46 95.06 98.01 99.03 Strong Dem + 10.13 rank 5
31 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.33 85.00 95.57 98.08 Strong Dem + 10.00 rank 5
32 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
93.22 93.83 97.85 98.70 Strong Dem + 9.89 rank 5
33 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.16 92.59 97.29 99.04 Strong Dem + 9.83 rank 5
34 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.13 93.83 97.09 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.80 rank 5
35 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.12 96.30 96.05 99.52 Strong Dem + 9.79 rank 5
36 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.96 92.50 95.75 98.88 Strong Dem + 9.63 rank 5
37 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
92.59 92.59 96.75 96.75 Strong Dem + 9.26 rank 5
38 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.54 90.12 95.81 98.57 Strong Dem + 9.21 rank 5
39 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.42 98.77 97.21 99.84 Strong Dem + 9.09 rank 5
40 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
92.34 98.75 97.83 99.68 Strong Dem + 9.01 rank 5
41 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.19 90.12 97.30 98.56 Strong Dem + 8.86 rank 5
42 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
91.88 85.90 97.17 97.94 Strong Dem + 8.55 rank 5
43TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
91.36 91.36 98.56 98.56 Strong Dem + 8.03 rank 5
43TIE Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
91.36 91.36 97.46 97.46 Strong Dem + 8.03 rank 5
45 Kennedy, Joe D
MA-4
91.17 96.30 97.09 99.36 Strong Dem + 7.84 rank 5
46 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.75 95.06 94.94 99.36 Strong Dem + 7.42 rank 5
47 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.58 95.06 96.70 99.20 Strong Dem + 7.25 rank 5
48 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.49 88.89 96.52 98.41 Strong Dem + 7.16 rank 5
49 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.21 88.89 96.39 98.57 Strong Dem + 6.88 rank 5
50 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.20 91.36 96.90 98.89 Strong Dem + 6.87 rank 5
51 Haaland, Debra D
NM-1
90.12 90.12 98.73 98.73 Strong Dem + 6.79 rank 5
52 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.93 92.59 96.13 98.55 Strong Dem + 6.60 rank 5
53 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.77 87.65 96.79 98.25 Strong Dem + 6.44 rank 5
54 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.71 98.77 94.08 99.20 Strong Dem + 6.38 rank 5
55 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
89.69 88.24 93.45 97.89 Strong Dem + 6.36 rank 5
56 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
89.53 88.89 98.45 98.57 Strong Dem + 6.20 rank 5
57 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.48 91.36 96.09 98.87 Strong Dem + 6.15 rank 5
58 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
89.43 92.59 97.61 99.03 Strong Dem + 6.10 rank 5
59 Fudge, Marcia D
OH-11
89.42 76.71 96.26 97.09 Strong Dem + 6.09 rank 5
60 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
89.22 95.06 96.65 99.21 Leaning Dem + 9.22 rank 5
61 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.11 91.36 93.96 98.70 Strong Dem + 5.78 rank 5
62 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
89.01 87.65 97.07 98.40 Strong Dem + 5.68 rank 5
63 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.97 88.89 95.10 98.26 Strong Dem + 5.64 rank 5
64 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
88.89 88.89 98.57 98.57 Strong Dem + 5.56 rank 5
65 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.27 77.33 95.73 97.10 Strong Dem + 4.94 rank 5
66 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
88.10 92.50 96.98 98.87 Strong Dem + 4.77 rank 5
67 Clay, William D
MO-1
87.98 90.00 94.85 98.68 Strong Dem + 4.65 rank 5
68 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.89 83.95 93.57 97.88 Strong Dem + 4.56 rank 5
69 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
87.86 86.42 96.81 98.04 Strong Dem + 4.53 rank 5
70 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.69 93.83 92.63 98.37 Strong Dem + 4.36 rank 5
71 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.46 95.06 93.33 99.21 Strong Dem + 4.13 rank 5
72 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.41 88.89 92.58 98.22 Strong Dem + 4.08 rank 5
73 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.40 85.33 96.85 98.18 Strong Dem + 4.07 rank 5
74 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.19 92.59 96.03 98.89 Strong Dem + 3.86 rank 5
75 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
87.06 98.77 96.12 99.36 Strong Dem + 3.73 rank 5
76 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.95 85.33 93.23 97.85 Strong Dem + 3.62 rank 5
77 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.84 90.12 92.97 98.70 Strong Dem + 3.51 rank 5
78 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.66 96.30 92.82 99.36 Strong Dem + 3.33 rank 5
79 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.55 91.25 95.91 98.40 Strong Dem + 3.22 rank 5
80 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
86.25 86.25 98.22 98.22 Leaning Dem + 6.25 rank 5
81 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.19 87.18 95.34 98.21 Strong Dem + 2.86 rank 5
82 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.03 95.06 92.17 99.36 Strong Dem + 2.70 rank 5
83 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
85.97 87.65 92.88 98.40 Strong Dem + 2.64 rank 5
84 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.89 83.95 95.14 97.74 Strong Dem + 2.56 rank 5
85 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.61 80.25 93.21 97.44 Strong Dem + 2.28 rank 5
86 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.53 80.25 92.37 97.15 Strong Dem + 2.20 rank 5
87 Engel, Eliot D
NY-16
85.40 91.36 92.00 98.72 Strong Dem + 2.07 rank 5
88 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.36 82.72 95.73 97.52 Strong Dem + 2.03 rank 5
89 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.22 88.89 95.08 98.08 Strong Dem + 1.89 rank 5
90 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
85.21 93.75 96.36 99.00 Strong Dem + 1.88 rank 5
91 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.19 85.00 94.52 97.52 Strong Dem + 1.86 rank 5
92 Lowey, Nita D
NY-17
85.01 82.72 92.17 97.73 Strong Dem + 1.68 rank 5
93 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
84.87 88.89 95.46 98.50 Strong Dem + 1.54 rank 5
94 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.26 87.65 94.82 98.25 Strong Dem + 0.93 rank 5
95 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
84.25 96.15 95.42 99.35 Strong Dem + 0.92 rank 5
96 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.02 82.28 91.62 97.73 Strong Dem + 0.69 rank 5
97 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
83.47 88.75 96.02 98.39 Strong Dem + 0.14 rank 5
98 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.23 86.25 94.26 98.06 Strong Dem - 0.10 rank 5
99 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.20 88.89 92.20 98.50 Strong Dem - 0.13 rank 5
100 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
82.94 86.42 92.93 98.25 Strong Dem - 0.39 rank 5
101 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.88 95.00 90.60 98.70 Swing + 6.21 rank 5
102 Shalala, Donna D
FL-27
82.72 82.72 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem - 0.61 rank 5
103 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.49 76.54 95.05 96.72 Leaning Rep + 9.16 rank 5
104 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.43 85.19 92.15 98.05 Strong Dem - 0.90 rank 5
105 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.25 84.81 91.19 97.88 Strong Dem - 1.08 rank 5
106 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.24 83.95 91.08 97.92 Strong Dem - 1.09 rank 5
107 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.17 80.25 93.96 97.07 Strong Dem - 1.16 rank 5
108 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.10 75.31 91.17 96.52 Strong Dem - 1.23 rank 5
109 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
81.48 81.48 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem - 1.85 rank 5
110 Davis, Susan D
CA-53
81.35 81.48 92.62 97.59 Strong Dem - 1.98 rank 5
111 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
81.21 83.12 94.84 97.51 Strong Dem - 2.12 rank 5
112 Lujan, Ben D
NM-3
81.06 87.65 93.95 98.41 Strong Dem - 2.27 rank 5
113 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
81.05 95.00 94.56 98.86 Strong Dem - 2.28 rank 5
114 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.84 87.65 90.69 98.24 Strong Dem - 2.49 rank 5
115 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
80.76 85.19 93.65 97.91 Strong Dem - 2.57 rank 5
116 Price, David D
NC-4
80.76 88.89 90.88 98.41 Strong Dem - 2.57 rank 5
117 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.57 80.00 94.12 97.42 Strong Dem - 2.76 rank 5
118 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
80.37 88.75 95.86 98.41 Strong Dem - 2.96 rank 5
119 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.10 77.78 92.24 96.82 Leaning Dem + 0.10 rank 5
120 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
80.09 83.95 95.86 97.75 Strong Dem - 3.24 rank 5
121 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
79.73 81.48 95.87 97.43 Strong Dem - 3.60 rank 5
122 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
79.65 85.19 95.82 97.94 Strong Dem - 3.68 rank 5
123 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.58 87.50 95.31 98.09 Strong Dem - 3.75 rank 5
124 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.11 75.31 95.66 96.66 Strong Dem - 4.22 rank 5
125 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
79.10 90.12 95.11 98.41 Strong Dem - 4.23 rank 5
126TIE Casten, Sean D
IL-6
79.01 79.01 97.15 97.15 Leaning Dem - 0.99 rank 5
126TIE Levin, Mike D
CA-49
79.01 79.01 97.31 97.31 Leaning Dem - 0.99 rank 5
128 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
78.80 86.25 94.20 98.02 Strong Dem - 4.53 rank 5
129 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.72 82.50 92.72 97.25 Strong Dem - 4.61 rank 5
130 Richmond, Cedric D
LA-2
78.47 83.33 92.58 96.96 Strong Dem - 4.86 rank 5
131 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.31 87.65 93.06 98.41 Strong Dem - 5.02 rank 5
132 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.17 81.33 92.18 97.32 Leaning Dem - 1.83 rank 5
133 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.17 81.48 92.31 97.45 Strong Dem - 5.16 rank 5
134 Green, Al D
TX-9
78.13 91.36 92.74 98.89 Strong Dem - 5.20 rank 5
135 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
78.09 91.36 94.20 98.87 Strong Dem - 5.24 rank 5
136 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
78.09 80.25 91.49 96.96 Strong Dem - 5.24 rank 5
137 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
77.91 76.54 96.66 96.57 Strong Dem - 5.42 rank 5
138 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.84 79.01 89.30 97.28 Strong Dem - 5.49 rank 5
139 Trone, David D
MD-6
77.78 77.78 96.64 96.64 Strong Dem - 5.55 rank 5
140 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.66 79.49 88.45 97.41 Strong Dem - 6.67 rank 5
141 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.57 82.72 93.23 97.78 Leaning Dem - 3.43 rank 5
142TIE Mucarsel-Powell, Debbie D
FL-26
76.54 76.54 96.82 96.82 Leaning Dem - 3.46 rank 5
142TIE Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
76.54 76.54 96.98 96.98 Strong Dem - 6.79 rank 5
144 Heck, Denny D
WA-10
76.40 85.00 93.86 97.91 Strong Dem - 6.93 rank 5
145 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
76.13 66.67 95.03 94.52 Strong Dem - 7.20 rank 5
146 Visclosky, Peter D
IN-1
75.81 80.25 88.34 97.29 Strong Dem - 7.52 rank 5
147 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
75.55 81.48 93.45 97.44 Leaning Dem - 4.45 rank 5
148 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.36 85.00 90.27 97.46 Strong Dem - 7.97 rank 5
149 Gabbard, Tulsi D
HI-2
75.30 65.67 92.49 93.24 Strong Dem - 8.03 rank 5
150 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
74.48 86.08 94.31 98.23 Strong Dem - 8.85 rank 5
151 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
74.27 87.50 93.46 98.41 Strong Dem - 9.06 rank 5
152 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
73.49 80.00 92.76 97.12 Strong Dem - 9.84 rank 5
153 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.48 85.19 91.40 98.05 Strong Dem - 9.85 rank 5
154 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.32 92.50 87.22 99.03 Strong Dem - 10.01 rank 5
155 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.26 70.67 93.78 94.91 Strong Dem - 10.07 rank 5
156 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
73.01 75.31 94.18 96.67 Strong Dem - 10.32 rank 5
157 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
72.84 72.84 96.19 96.19 Swing - 3.83 rank 5
158 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.48 95.00 86.92 99.19 Strong Dem - 10.85 rank 5
159 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
72.04 82.72 91.55 97.13 Strong Dem - 11.29 rank 5
160 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.93 75.31 86.28 95.74 Swing - 4.74 rank 5
161TIE Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
71.60 71.60 93.66 93.66 Swing - 5.07 rank 5
161TIE Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
71.60 71.60 96.18 96.18 Swing - 5.07 rank 5
161TIE Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
71.60 71.60 96.03 96.03 Swing - 5.07 rank 5
164TIE Allred, Colin D
TX-32
71.25 71.25 95.63 95.63 Leaning Dem - 8.75 rank 5
164TIE Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
71.25 71.25 96.34 96.34 Leaning Dem - 8.75 rank 5
166 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
71.16 77.78 90.11 96.79 Strong Dem - 12.17 rank 5
167 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
70.89 70.89 96.02 96.02 Swing - 5.78 rank 5
168 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
70.87 83.75 92.64 97.93 Strong Dem - 12.46 rank 5
169 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
70.37 70.37 96.04 96.04 Leaning Dem - 9.63 rank 5
170 Cisneros, Gil D
CA-39
69.14 69.14 95.87 95.87 Leaning Dem - 10.86 rank 5
171 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
68.61 80.25 93.42 97.46 Strong Dem - 14.72 rank 5
172 Loebsack, Dave D
IA-2
68.31 70.37 91.08 96.15 Swing - 8.36 rank 5
173 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.28 80.00 88.36 97.28 Strong Dem - 15.05 rank 5
174 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
67.90 67.90 95.56 95.56 Swing - 8.77 rank 5
175 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
67.89 74.32 89.96 96.35 Strong Dem - 15.44 rank 5
176 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
67.38 77.78 91.65 97.11 Leaning Dem - 12.62 rank 5
177 Case, Ed D
HI-1
67.25 66.67 82.47 95.39 Strong Dem - 16.08 rank 5
178 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
67.21 79.01 89.56 97.06 Strong Dem - 16.12 rank 5
179TIE Cox, T. J. D
CA-21
66.67 66.67 94.73 94.73 Strong Dem - 16.66 rank 5
179TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
66.67 66.67 95.40 95.40 Leaning Dem - 13.33 rank 5
179TIE Porter, Katie D
CA-45
66.67 66.67 94.40 94.40 Leaning Dem - 13.33 rank 5
179TIE Wild, Susan D
PA-7
66.67 65.43 94.85 94.74 Swing - 10.00 rank 5
183 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.50 77.50 88.15 96.80 Strong Dem - 16.83 rank 5
184 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
65.81 82.72 90.27 97.76 Strong Dem - 17.52 rank 5
185 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
65.49 86.42 91.17 97.91 Strong Dem - 17.84 rank 5
186 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
65.09 82.50 91.24 97.76 Strong Dem - 18.24 rank 5
187 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
65.00 65.00 94.59 94.59 Leaning Dem - 15.00 rank 5
188 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
64.81 74.07 92.49 96.10 Strong Dem - 18.52 rank 5
189TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
64.20 64.20 95.07 95.07 Swing - 12.47 rank 5
189TIE Rouda, Harley D
CA-48
64.20 64.20 94.99 94.99 Swing - 12.47 rank 5
191 González, Vicente D
TX-15
64.16 74.07 89.33 94.14 Strong Dem - 19.17 rank 5
192TIE Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
61.73 61.73 94.61 94.61 Leaning Rep - 11.60 rank 5
192TIE Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
61.73 61.73 94.61 94.61 Leaning Dem - 18.27 rank 5
192TIE Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
61.73 61.73 94.45 94.45 Swing - 14.94 rank 5
195 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
60.95 80.25 91.77 97.28 Strong Dem - 22.38 rank 5
196 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
60.81 76.54 90.45 96.32 Leaning Dem - 19.19 rank 5
197 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
60.49 60.49 94.14 94.14 Swing - 16.18 rank 5
198 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
59.95 58.23 82.99 92.42 Leaning Dem - 20.05 rank 5
199 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.14 76.54 79.27 96.12 Strong Dem - 24.19 rank 5
200 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
58.87 83.95 86.37 95.85 Strong Dem - 24.46 rank 5
201 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
58.30 66.67 90.81 95.56 Leaning Dem - 21.70 rank 5
202 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
58.04 70.37 91.10 95.95 Strong Dem - 25.29 rank 5
203 Lipinski, Daniel D
IL-3
57.78 59.26 84.60 91.79 Strong Dem - 25.55 rank 5
204 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
57.24 77.78 86.92 97.14 Strong Dem - 26.09 rank 5
205 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
57.03 75.31 79.47 94.71 Strong Dem - 26.30 rank 5
206 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
56.57 85.19 88.47 98.10 Strong Dem - 26.76 rank 5
207 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
55.81 80.25 88.36 97.46 Strong Dem - 27.52 rank 5
208 Rose, Max D
NY-11
55.56 55.56 91.97 91.97 Leaning Rep - 17.77 rank 5
209 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
54.32 54.32 93.16 93.16 Swing - 22.35 rank 5
210 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
54.11 73.75 82.91 96.05 Leaning Dem - 25.89 rank 5
211 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
53.95 70.37 88.52 96.19 Swing - 22.72 rank 5
212 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
53.03 66.67 85.18 94.65 Strong Dem - 30.30 rank 5
213 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
52.23 70.00 87.41 95.83 Swing - 24.44 rank 5
214 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
51.48 72.84 87.04 96.01 Swing - 25.19 rank 5
215 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
50.62 50.62 92.23 92.23 Swing - 26.05 rank 5
216 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
48.00 53.09 86.10 91.72 Leaning Dem - 32.00 rank 5
217 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
47.33 40.74 84.53 88.22 Swing - 29.34 rank 5
218 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
44.44 44.44 90.81 90.81 Leaning Rep - 28.89 rank 5
219 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
44.27 71.60 74.36 94.11 Strong Dem - 39.06 rank 5
220 Torres Small, Xochitl D
NM-2
43.21 43.21 89.97 89.97 Leaning Rep - 30.12 rank 5
221 Finkenauer, Abby D
IA-1
41.98 41.98 91.13 91.13 Swing - 34.69 rank 5
222 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
41.25 41.25 88.78 88.78 Swing - 35.42 rank 5
223 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
40.74 40.74 90.84 90.84 Swing - 35.93 rank 5
224 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
40.02 66.67 74.32 90.63 Strong Dem - 43.31 rank 5
225 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
39.11 34.57 82.02 88.36 Swing - 37.56 rank 5
226 Peterson, Collin D
MN-7
39.08 37.04 60.68 77.42 Strong Rep - 30.92 rank 5
227 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
34.57 34.57 85.58 85.58 Leaning Rep - 38.76 rank 5
229TIE Horn, Kendra D
OK-5
28.40 28.40 86.53 86.53 Strong Rep - 41.60 rank 5
229TIE Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
28.40 28.40 88.08 88.08 Leaning Rep - 44.93 rank 5
232 McAdams, Ben D
UT-4
27.16 27.16 79.05 79.05 Strong Rep - 42.84 rank 5
234 Brindisi, Anthony D
NY-22
24.69 24.69 83.94 83.94 Strong Rep - 45.31 rank 5
235 Cunningham, Joe D
SC-1
23.46 23.46 82.99 82.99 Strong Rep - 46.54 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)
  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)