What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2019-20 Lifetime 2019-20 % Rating
1 Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.82 99.82 Leaning Dem + 20.00 rank 5
2 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
99.06 98.53 99.12 99.63 Strong Dem + 15.73 rank 5
3 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.63 97.10 99.14 98.89 Strong Dem + 15.30 rank 5
4 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
98.13 98.55 98.83 99.45 Strong Dem + 14.80 rank 5
5 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
97.81 95.65 98.98 99.44 Strong Dem + 14.48 rank 5
6TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
97.10 97.10 99.26 99.26 Strong Dem + 13.77 rank 5
6TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.10 97.10 97.58 97.58 Strong Dem + 13.77 rank 5
8 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.80 95.65 98.22 99.08 Strong Dem + 13.47 rank 5
9 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.73 98.55 97.37 99.63 Strong Dem + 13.40 rank 5
10TIE Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.71 97.06 99.26 99.26 Strong Dem + 13.38 rank 5
10TIE Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.71 95.65 98.97 98.90 Strong Dem + 13.38 rank 5
12 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.56 97.10 98.11 99.45 Strong Dem + 13.23 rank 5
13 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.42 94.12 98.04 98.67 Strong Dem + 13.09 rank 5
14 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.34 92.75 98.70 99.07 Strong Dem + 13.01 rank 5
15 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
95.99 98.55 98.19 99.07 Strong Dem + 12.66 rank 5
16 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.77 97.06 98.54 99.44 Strong Dem + 12.44 rank 5
17 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.67 97.10 96.89 99.44 Strong Dem + 12.34 rank 5
18TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.65 95.65 98.89 98.89 Strong Dem + 12.32 rank 5
18TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
95.65 95.65 96.32 96.32 Strong Dem + 12.32 rank 5
18TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
95.65 95.65 97.42 97.42 Strong Dem + 12.32 rank 5
21 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.39 94.20 98.81 99.08 Strong Dem + 12.06 rank 5
22 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.23 100.00 97.47 99.26 Strong Dem + 11.90 rank 5
23 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.17 100.00 98.16 99.63 Strong Dem + 11.84 rank 5
24 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.96 94.03 96.72 99.06 Strong Dem + 11.63 rank 5
25 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.78 85.29 97.25 98.13 Strong Dem + 11.45 rank 5
26 Lewis, John1 D
GA-5
94.57 75.38 96.59 96.64 Strong Dem + 11.24 rank 5
27 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.16 95.65 97.39 99.22 Strong Dem + 10.83 rank 5
28 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.62 88.89 94.93 97.87 Strong Dem + 10.29 rank 5
29 Serrano, José D
NY-15
93.47 80.30 95.64 97.25 Strong Dem + 10.14 rank 5
30 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.37 85.29 95.55 98.14 Strong Dem + 10.04 rank 5
31 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.33 94.20 97.96 98.87 Strong Dem + 10.00 rank 5
32 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
93.25 94.20 97.82 98.67 Strong Dem + 9.92 rank 5
33 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.18 92.75 97.27 99.07 Strong Dem + 9.85 rank 5
34 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.09 95.65 96.01 99.44 Strong Dem + 9.76 rank 5
35 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.08 92.75 97.05 98.51 Strong Dem + 9.75 rank 5
36 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.91 89.71 95.71 98.51 Strong Dem + 9.58 rank 5
37TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
92.75 92.75 98.88 98.88 Strong Dem + 9.42 rank 5
37TIE Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
92.75 92.75 96.79 96.79 Strong Dem + 9.42 rank 5
37TIE Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
92.75 92.75 99.08 99.08 Strong Dem + 9.42 rank 5
40 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.50 88.41 95.77 98.34 Strong Dem + 9.17 rank 5
41 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.16 97.10 97.12 99.63 Strong Dem + 8.83 rank 5
42 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.03 88.41 97.23 98.33 Strong Dem + 8.70 rank 5
43 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
91.90 98.53 97.70 99.63 Strong Dem + 8.57 rank 5
44 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
91.88 84.85 97.12 97.78 Strong Dem + 8.55 rank 5
45TIE Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
91.30 91.30 97.24 97.24 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
45TIE Haaland, Debra D
NM-1
91.30 91.30 98.89 98.89 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
47 Kennedy, Joe D
MA-4
91.16 97.10 97.04 99.45 Strong Dem + 7.83 rank 5
48 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.74 95.65 94.91 99.45 Strong Dem + 7.41 rank 5
49 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.57 89.86 96.49 98.52 Strong Dem + 7.24 rank 5
50 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.57 95.65 96.67 99.26 Strong Dem + 7.24 rank 5
51 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.13 86.96 96.35 98.34 Strong Dem + 6.80 rank 5
52 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.00 89.86 96.81 98.71 Strong Dem + 6.67 rank 5
53 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.84 91.30 96.08 98.32 Strong Dem + 6.51 rank 5
54 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.68 85.51 96.75 97.97 Strong Dem + 6.35 rank 5
55 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
89.64 75.00 93.10 88.89 Strong Dem + 6.31 rank 5
56 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.63 97.10 94.01 98.89 Strong Dem + 6.30 rank 5
57 Fudge, Marcia D
OH-11
89.41 74.19 96.22 96.82 Strong Dem + 6.08 rank 5
58 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.31 88.41 96.02 98.50 Strong Dem + 5.98 rank 5
59TIE Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
89.19 88.41 97.04 98.51 Strong Dem + 5.86 rank 5
59TIE Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
89.19 88.41 98.39 98.53 Strong Dem + 5.86 rank 5
61 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.08 89.86 93.90 98.49 Strong Dem + 5.75 rank 5
62 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.96 88.41 95.06 98.16 Strong Dem + 5.63 rank 5
63 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
88.84 91.30 97.47 98.87 Strong Dem + 5.51 rank 5
64 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
88.83 92.75 96.53 98.90 Leaning Dem + 8.83 rank 5
65 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
88.41 88.41 98.53 98.53 Strong Dem + 5.08 rank 5
66 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.23 74.60 95.67 96.79 Strong Dem + 4.90 rank 5
67 Clay, William D
MO-1
88.00 91.18 94.82 98.85 Strong Dem + 4.67 rank 5
68 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.90 84.06 93.54 97.91 Strong Dem + 4.57 rank 5
69 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
87.74 85.51 96.73 97.90 Strong Dem + 4.41 rank 5
70 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.65 92.75 92.58 98.29 Strong Dem + 4.32 rank 5
71 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.53 85.71 96.82 98.27 Strong Dem + 4.20 rank 5
72 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.45 95.65 93.28 99.26 Strong Dem + 4.12 rank 5
73 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
87.43 89.71 96.82 98.50 Strong Dem + 4.10 rank 5
74 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.34 85.51 92.51 97.74 Strong Dem + 4.01 rank 5
75 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.07 91.30 95.97 98.71 Strong Dem + 3.74 rank 5
76 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
86.97 100.00 96.07 99.63 Strong Dem + 3.64 rank 5
77 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.91 82.54 93.17 97.41 Strong Dem + 3.58 rank 5
78 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.80 88.41 92.92 98.49 Strong Dem + 3.47 rank 5
79 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.64 97.10 92.78 99.63 Strong Dem + 3.31 rank 5
80 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.35 88.24 95.85 98.14 Strong Dem + 3.02 rank 5
81 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.14 86.36 95.28 98.11 Strong Dem + 2.81 rank 5
82 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.01 95.65 92.11 99.44 Strong Dem + 2.68 rank 5
83 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
85.93 85.51 92.82 98.14 Strong Dem + 2.60 rank 5
84 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.92 84.06 95.10 97.77 Strong Dem + 2.59 rank 5
85 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.69 82.61 93.19 97.79 Strong Dem + 2.36 rank 5
86 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.51 78.26 92.32 96.88 Strong Dem + 2.18 rank 5
87 Shalala, Donna D
FL-27
85.51 85.51 97.97 97.97 Strong Dem + 2.18 rank 5
88 Engel, Eliot D
NY-16
85.49 97.10 91.98 99.45 Strong Dem + 2.16 rank 5
89 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.40 82.61 95.68 97.50 Strong Dem + 2.07 rank 5
90 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
85.29 85.29 98.12 98.12 Leaning Dem + 5.29 rank 5
91 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.16 88.41 95.01 97.96 Strong Dem + 1.83 rank 5
92 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.08 82.35 94.47 97.30 Strong Dem + 1.75 rank 5
93 Lowey, Nita D
NY-17
85.04 84.06 92.14 97.94 Strong Dem + 1.71 rank 5
94 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
84.99 94.12 96.26 99.03 Strong Dem + 1.66 rank 5
95 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
84.56 86.96 95.33 98.25 Strong Dem + 1.23 rank 5
96 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.19 86.96 94.77 98.15 Strong Dem + 0.86 rank 5
97 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
83.97 79.10 91.55 97.35 Strong Dem + 0.64 rank 5
98 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
83.76 93.94 95.27 99.05 Strong Dem + 0.43 rank 5
99 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
83.47 89.71 95.96 98.50 Strong Dem + 0.14 rank 5
100 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.14 85.29 94.18 97.94 Strong Dem - 0.19 rank 5
101 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.13 86.96 92.12 98.25 Strong Dem - 0.20 rank 5
102 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.91 98.55 90.57 99.25 Swing + 6.24 rank 5
103 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
82.89 85.51 92.86 98.15 Strong Dem - 0.44 rank 5
104 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.80 78.26 95.07 97.13 Leaning Rep + 9.47 rank 5
105TIE Levin, Mike D
CA-49
82.61 82.61 97.79 97.79 Leaning Dem + 2.61 rank 5
105TIE Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
82.61 82.61 97.79 97.79 Strong Dem - 0.72 rank 5
107 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.42 85.51 92.09 98.11 Strong Dem - 0.91 rank 5
108 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.22 81.16 93.93 97.16 Strong Dem - 1.11 rank 5
109 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.22 83.58 91.13 97.71 Strong Dem - 1.11 rank 5
110 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.21 82.61 91.00 97.77 Strong Dem - 1.12 rank 5
111 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.12 75.36 91.13 96.52 Strong Dem - 1.21 rank 5
112 Davis, Susan D
CA-53
81.42 84.06 92.59 97.95 Strong Dem - 1.91 rank 5
113 Mucarsel-Powell, Debbie D
FL-26
81.16 81.16 97.41 97.41 Strong Dem - 2.17 rank 5
114 Lujan, Ben D
NM-3
81.04 88.41 93.89 98.53 Strong Dem - 2.29 rank 5
115 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
80.99 81.54 94.73 97.24 Strong Dem - 2.34 rank 5
116 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
80.95 85.51 96.06 98.15 Strong Dem - 2.38 rank 5
117 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.83 88.41 90.63 98.33 Strong Dem - 2.50 rank 5
118 Price, David D
NC-4
80.75 89.86 90.82 98.53 Strong Dem - 2.58 rank 5
119 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
80.53 82.61 93.53 97.58 Strong Dem - 2.80 rank 5
120 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
80.50 92.65 94.38 98.48 Strong Dem - 2.83 rank 5
121 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.48 77.94 94.05 97.19 Strong Dem - 2.85 rank 5
122 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
80.37 85.51 95.83 97.96 Strong Dem - 2.96 rank 5
123 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.17 79.71 92.20 97.05 Leaning Dem + 0.17 rank 5
124 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.81 76.81 95.67 96.86 Strong Dem - 3.52 rank 5
125 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.73 89.71 95.31 98.52 Strong Dem - 3.60 rank 5
126TIE Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
79.71 88.24 95.67 98.34 Strong Dem - 3.62 rank 5
126TIE Casten, Sean D
IL-6
79.71 79.71 97.24 97.24 Leaning Dem - 0.29 rank 5
126TIE Trone, David D
MD-6
79.71 79.71 97.05 97.05 Strong Dem - 3.62 rank 5
129 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
78.97 84.06 95.63 97.79 Strong Dem - 4.36 rank 5
130 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
78.88 88.24 94.13 98.27 Strong Dem - 4.45 rank 5
131 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.78 84.06 92.65 97.38 Strong Dem - 4.55 rank 5
132 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
78.69 89.86 94.97 98.33 Strong Dem - 4.64 rank 5
133 Richmond, Cedric D
LA-2
78.41 83.33 92.51 97.06 Strong Dem - 4.92 rank 5
134TIE Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
78.26 78.26 97.24 97.24 Swing + 1.59 rank 5
134TIE Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
78.26 78.26 97.24 97.24 Strong Dem - 5.07 rank 5
136 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.21 86.96 92.99 98.34 Strong Dem - 5.12 rank 5
137 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.20 82.61 92.26 97.60 Strong Dem - 5.13 rank 5
138 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.14 80.95 92.12 97.26 Leaning Dem - 1.86 rank 5
139 Green, Al D
TX-9
78.03 91.30 92.66 98.90 Strong Dem - 5.30 rank 5
140 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
78.01 78.26 91.41 96.65 Strong Dem - 5.32 rank 5
141 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
78.01 92.75 94.12 99.06 Strong Dem - 5.32 rank 5
142 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.85 79.71 89.24 97.40 Strong Dem - 5.48 rank 5
143 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
77.03 75.36 96.49 96.38 Strong Dem - 6.30 rank 5
144 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.68 80.60 88.39 97.58 Strong Dem - 6.65 rank 5
145 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
76.67 66.67 95.01 94.34 Strong Dem - 6.66 rank 5
146 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.59 84.06 93.18 97.98 Leaning Dem - 3.41 rank 5
147 Heck, Denny D
WA-10
76.09 83.82 93.73 97.77 Strong Dem - 7.24 rank 5
148 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
75.95 84.06 93.32 97.77 Leaning Dem - 4.05 rank 5
149 Visclosky, Peter D
IN-1
75.82 81.16 88.28 97.59 Strong Dem - 7.51 rank 5
150 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.36 86.76 90.20 97.60 Strong Dem - 7.97 rank 5
151 Gabbard, Tulsi D
HI-2
74.96 60.00 92.32 91.89 Strong Dem - 8.37 rank 5
152 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
74.60 88.41 94.24 98.52 Strong Dem - 8.73 rank 5
153 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
73.93 86.76 93.32 98.34 Strong Dem - 9.40 rank 5
154 Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
73.91 73.91 96.49 96.49 Leaning Dem - 6.09 rank 5
155 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.48 71.43 93.72 94.83 Strong Dem - 9.85 rank 5
156 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
73.46 80.88 92.66 97.21 Strong Dem - 9.87 rank 5
157 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.28 94.12 87.11 99.25 Strong Dem - 10.05 rank 5
158 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.25 82.61 91.28 97.72 Strong Dem - 10.08 rank 5
159 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
72.90 75.36 94.03 96.69 Strong Dem - 10.43 rank 5
160 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
72.46 72.46 96.32 96.32 Leaning Dem - 7.54 rank 5
161 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.36 92.65 86.80 98.87 Strong Dem - 10.97 rank 5
162 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
72.06 72.06 96.49 96.49 Leaning Dem - 7.94 rank 5
163 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.95 76.81 86.21 95.98 Swing - 4.72 rank 5
164 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
71.93 82.61 91.45 97.04 Strong Dem - 11.40 rank 5
165 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
71.12 78.26 90.01 96.83 Strong Dem - 12.21 rank 5
166TIE Cisneros, Gil D
CA-39
71.01 71.01 96.13 96.13 Leaning Dem - 8.99 rank 5
166TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
71.01 71.01 95.95 95.95 Leaning Dem - 8.99 rank 5
166TIE Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
71.01 71.01 93.38 93.38 Swing - 5.66 rank 5
166TIE Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
71.01 71.01 95.95 95.95 Swing - 5.66 rank 5
170 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
70.59 70.59 95.48 95.48 Leaning Dem - 9.41 rank 5
171 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
70.45 82.35 92.47 97.79 Strong Dem - 12.88 rank 5
172 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
70.15 70.15 95.93 95.93 Swing - 6.52 rank 5
173 Rouda, Harley D
CA-48
69.57 69.57 95.68 95.68 Leaning Dem - 10.43 rank 5
174 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
68.72 82.61 93.29 97.79 Strong Dem - 14.61 rank 5
175 Loebsack, Dave D
IA-2
68.40 72.46 91.04 96.46 Swing - 8.27 rank 5
176 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.29 82.35 88.27 97.58 Strong Dem - 15.04 rank 5
177TIE Cox, T. J. D
CA-21
68.12 68.12 94.99 94.99 Strong Dem - 15.21 rank 5
177TIE Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
68.12 68.12 95.58 95.58 Swing - 8.55 rank 5
179 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
68.06 66.67 94.95 94.81 Swing - 8.61 rank 5
180 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
67.75 72.58 89.85 96.12 Strong Dem - 15.58 rank 5
181 Case, Ed D
HI-1
67.41 68.12 81.90 95.57 Strong Dem - 15.92 rank 5
182 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
67.22 78.26 91.52 97.21 Leaning Dem - 12.78 rank 5
183 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
67.11 79.71 89.42 97.15 Strong Dem - 16.22 rank 5
184 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.50 79.41 88.06 97.03 Strong Dem - 16.83 rank 5
185 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
66.18 66.18 94.64 94.64 Leaning Dem - 13.82 rank 5
186 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
65.67 84.06 90.14 97.96 Strong Dem - 17.66 rank 5
187TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
65.22 65.22 95.40 95.40 Swing - 11.45 rank 5
187TIE McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
65.22 65.22 95.04 95.04 Swing - 11.45 rank 5
189 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
64.89 83.82 91.10 97.96 Strong Dem - 18.44 rank 5
190 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
64.49 86.96 90.75 97.94 Strong Dem - 18.84 rank 5
191 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
64.48 73.91 92.33 96.02 Strong Dem - 18.85 rank 5
192TIE Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
63.77 63.77 95.04 95.04 Leaning Rep - 9.56 rank 5
192TIE Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
63.77 63.77 94.85 94.85 Leaning Dem - 16.23 rank 5
192TIE Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
63.77 63.77 94.85 94.85 Swing - 12.90 rank 5
195 González, Vicente D
TX-15
63.55 73.91 88.88 93.76 Strong Dem - 19.78 rank 5
196 Porter, Katie D
CA-45
62.32 62.32 93.87 93.87 Leaning Dem - 17.68 rank 5
197 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
60.76 82.61 91.63 97.59 Strong Dem - 22.57 rank 5
198 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
60.48 78.26 90.23 96.68 Leaning Dem - 19.52 rank 5
199 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.14 61.19 82.89 92.91 Leaning Dem - 19.86 rank 5
200 Rose, Max D
NY-11
59.42 59.42 93.10 93.10 Leaning Rep - 13.91 rank 5
201 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.12 78.26 79.14 96.23 Strong Dem - 24.21 rank 5
202 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
58.77 69.57 90.66 95.96 Leaning Dem - 21.23 rank 5
203 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
58.54 85.51 86.10 95.75 Strong Dem - 24.79 rank 5
204 Lipinski, Daniel D
IL-3
57.90 62.32 84.56 92.51 Strong Dem - 25.43 rank 5
205 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
57.08 69.57 90.74 95.85 Strong Dem - 26.25 rank 5
206 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
56.98 79.71 86.60 97.43 Strong Dem - 26.35 rank 5
207 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
56.93 75.36 79.29 94.41 Strong Dem - 26.40 rank 5
208 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
56.03 85.51 88.22 98.16 Strong Dem - 27.30 rank 5
209 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
55.43 81.16 88.14 97.61 Strong Dem - 27.90 rank 5
210 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
53.69 71.01 88.34 96.32 Swing - 22.98 rank 5
211 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
53.67 73.53 82.51 95.96 Leaning Dem - 26.33 rank 5
212 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
53.62 53.62 93.36 93.36 Swing - 23.05 rank 5
213 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
52.92 68.12 84.94 94.72 Strong Dem - 30.41 rank 5
214 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
52.17 52.17 92.65 92.65 Swing - 24.50 rank 5
215 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
51.51 76.81 86.87 96.48 Swing - 25.16 rank 5
216 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
51.17 69.57 86.87 95.74 Swing - 25.50 rank 5
217 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
49.58 43.48 85.07 89.52 Swing - 27.09 rank 5
218 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
47.89 53.62 85.97 92.27 Leaning Dem - 32.11 rank 5
219TIE Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
47.83 47.83 91.91 91.91 Leaning Rep - 25.50 rank 5
219TIE Torres Small, Xochitl D
NM-2
47.83 47.83 91.51 91.51 Leaning Rep - 25.50 rank 5
221 Finkenauer, Abby D
IA-1
44.93 44.93 92.65 92.65 Swing - 31.74 rank 5
222 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
44.17 73.91 74.12 94.27 Strong Dem - 39.16 rank 5
223 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
44.12 44.12 89.22 89.22 Swing - 32.55 rank 5
224 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
39.83 66.67 74.08 90.24 Strong Dem - 43.50 rank 5
225 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
39.44 34.78 81.71 88.56 Swing - 37.23 rank 5
226 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
39.13 39.13 90.84 90.84 Swing - 37.54 rank 5
227 Peterson, Collin D
MN-7
39.12 39.13 60.62 78.85 Strong Rep - 30.88 rank 5
228 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
37.68 37.68 87.50 87.50 Leaning Rep - 35.65 rank 5
230 McAdams, Ben D
UT-4
30.43 30.43 80.11 80.11 Strong Rep - 39.57 rank 5
231TIE Horn, Kendra D
OK-5
28.99 28.99 87.68 87.68 Strong Rep - 41.01 rank 5
231TIE Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
28.99 28.99 88.75 88.75 Leaning Rep - 44.34 rank 5
235 Brindisi, Anthony D
NY-22
26.09 26.09 84.71 84.71 Strong Rep - 43.91 rank 5
236 Cunningham, Joe D
SC-1
24.64 24.64 83.21 83.21 Strong Rep - 45.36 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)
  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)