What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2021-22 Lifetime 2021-22 % Rating
1TIE Carter, Troy D
LA-2
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.74 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Newman, Marie D
IL-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
5 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.65 98.33 99.13 99.17 Strong Dem + 15.32 rank 5
6TIE Bush, Cori D
MO-1
98.36 98.36 99.21 99.21 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
6TIE Jones, Mondaire D
NY-17
98.36 98.36 99.19 99.19 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
6TIE Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
98.36 98.36 99.20 99.20 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
6TIE Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
98.36 98.36 99.21 99.21 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
6TIE Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
98.36 98.36 99.19 99.19 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
6TIE Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.36 98.36 99.21 99.21 Strong Dem + 15.03 rank 5
12 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.99 100.00 98.88 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.66 rank 5
13 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
97.76 100.00 99.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.43 rank 5
14 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.98 100.00 99.19 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.65 rank 5
15 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
96.90 98.36 98.88 99.20 Strong Dem + 13.57 rank 5
16 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.82 100.00 97.42 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.49 rank 5
17 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.73 98.36 98.65 99.20 Strong Dem + 13.40 rank 5
18TIE Jacobs, Sara D
CA-53
96.72 96.72 98.41 98.41 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
18TIE Kahele, Kai D
HI-2
96.72 96.72 98.41 98.41 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
20TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
96.69 98.36 98.84 99.21 Strong Dem + 13.36 rank 5
20TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
96.69 96.72 99.10 98.41 Strong Dem + 13.36 rank 5
20TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.69 98.36 97.67 99.21 Strong Dem + 13.36 rank 5
23 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.60 100.00 98.21 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.27 rank 5
24 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.59 95.08 98.14 97.58 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
25 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.32 98.36 98.81 99.21 Strong Dem + 12.99 rank 5
26 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.22 98.36 98.02 99.21 Strong Dem + 12.89 rank 5
27 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.18 96.72 98.73 98.40 Strong Dem + 12.85 rank 5
28 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.16 96.72 98.25 98.39 Strong Dem + 12.83 rank 5
29 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.71 100.00 96.93 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.38 rank 5
30 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.38 100.00 98.73 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.05 rank 5
31 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
95.36 95.08 96.52 97.60 Strong Dem + 12.03 rank 5
32 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.30 100.00 97.51 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.97 rank 5
33TIE Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
95.08 95.08 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
33TIE Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
95.08 95.08 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
33TIE Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
95.08 95.08 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
33TIE Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
95.08 95.08 97.60 97.60 Leans Dem + 15.08 rank 5
33TIE Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
95.08 95.08 97.62 97.62 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
38 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.04 96.72 98.09 98.41 Strong Dem + 11.71 rank 5
39 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.95 96.72 97.31 98.40 Strong Dem + 11.62 rank 5
40 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.91 95.08 96.69 97.50 Strong Dem + 11.58 rank 5
41TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
94.70 100.00 98.70 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.37 rank 5
41TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
94.70 93.44 97.16 96.83 Strong Dem + 11.37 rank 5
43 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.15 100.00 97.46 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.82 rank 5
44 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
94.04 96.72 98.71 98.41 Strong Dem + 10.71 rank 5
45 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.56 100.00 94.94 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.23 rank 5
46TIE Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
93.38 98.36 97.55 99.20 Strong Dem + 10.05 rank 5
46TIE Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
93.38 96.72 96.72 98.41 Strong Dem + 10.05 rank 5
48 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.35 96.72 95.60 98.41 Strong Dem + 10.02 rank 5
49 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.28 98.36 97.83 99.19 Strong Dem + 9.95 rank 5
50 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
93.22 96.72 97.79 98.41 Strong Dem + 9.89 rank 5
51 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.07 96.72 97.24 98.41 Strong Dem + 9.74 rank 5
52 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
92.95 96.72 96.06 98.40 Strong Dem + 9.62 rank 5
53 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
92.95 93.44 97.07 96.83 Strong Dem + 9.62 rank 5
54 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.86 95.08 95.71 97.60 Strong Dem + 9.53 rank 5
55 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.82 100.00 97.27 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.49 rank 5
56 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
92.77 96.72 97.71 98.41 Strong Dem + 9.44 rank 5
57 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.48 96.72 95.81 98.40 Strong Dem + 9.15 rank 5
58 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.30 96.72 97.24 98.41 Strong Dem + 8.97 rank 5
59 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
92.17 100.00 97.18 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.84 rank 5
60 Bourdeaux, Carolyn D
GA-7
91.80 91.80 96.03 96.03 Leans Dem + 11.80 rank 5
61 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
91.67 100.00 97.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
62 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
91.39 96.72 98.33 98.41 Strong Dem + 8.06 rank 5
63 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
91.03 96.72 98.11 98.41 Strong Dem + 7.70 rank 5
64 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.83 98.36 96.89 99.20 Strong Dem + 7.50 rank 5
65 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.73 95.08 94.97 97.62 Strong Dem + 7.40 rank 5
66 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.56 95.08 96.50 97.62 Strong Dem + 7.23 rank 5
67 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
90.33 98.33 97.08 99.19 Strong Dem + 7.00 rank 5
68 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.31 96.72 96.57 98.41 Strong Dem + 6.98 rank 5
69 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.20 93.44 96.37 96.83 Strong Dem + 6.87 rank 5
70 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
90.09 96.72 93.80 98.41 Strong Dem + 6.76 rank 5
71 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.08 96.72 96.16 98.41 Strong Dem + 6.75 rank 5
72 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.00 98.36 98.04 99.21 Leans Dem + 10.00 rank 5
73 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.99 95.08 96.80 97.62 Strong Dem + 6.66 rank 5
74 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.78 100.00 94.14 100.00 Strong Dem + 6.45 rank 5
75 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.72 98.36 96.16 99.21 Strong Dem + 6.39 rank 5
76 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
89.64 96.72 96.60 98.41 Swing + 12.97 rank 5
77 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
89.40 98.36 96.84 99.21 Strong Dem + 6.07 rank 5
78 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.30 100.00 94.04 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.97 rank 5
79 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.96 96.67 95.11 98.40 Strong Dem + 5.63 rank 5
80 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
88.59 98.36 96.80 99.20 Strong Dem + 5.26 rank 5
81 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
88.50 95.08 96.84 97.60 Strong Dem + 5.17 rank 5
82 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.40 98.36 95.74 99.21 Strong Dem + 5.07 rank 5
83 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.90 95.08 93.59 97.62 Strong Dem + 4.57 rank 5
84 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.82 96.72 92.70 98.40 Strong Dem + 4.49 rank 5
85 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.64 98.36 93.42 99.21 Strong Dem + 4.31 rank 5
86 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.58 96.72 92.65 98.41 Strong Dem + 4.25 rank 5
87 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
87.42 96.72 97.55 98.41 Strong Dem + 4.09 rank 5
88 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
87.28 98.36 96.02 99.21 Strong Dem + 3.95 rank 5
89 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.25 95.08 96.01 97.62 Strong Dem + 3.92 rank 5
90 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
87.02 96.72 96.38 98.41 Strong Dem + 3.69 rank 5
91 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.85 96.72 92.92 98.41 Strong Dem + 3.52 rank 5
92 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.85 93.44 92.99 96.83 Strong Dem + 3.52 rank 5
93 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
86.75 98.36 97.30 99.21 Strong Dem + 3.42 rank 5
94 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.66 91.80 95.83 96.03 Strong Dem + 3.33 rank 5
95 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.36 98.33 95.35 99.19 Strong Dem + 3.03 rank 5
96 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.28 100.00 92.29 100.00 Strong Dem + 2.95 rank 5
97 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.10 96.67 92.93 98.40 Strong Dem + 2.77 rank 5
98 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
86.09 96.72 97.30 98.41 Strong Dem + 2.76 rank 5
99 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
86.05 98.36 95.69 99.21 Strong Dem + 2.72 rank 5
100 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.99 95.08 95.10 97.54 Strong Dem + 2.66 rank 5
101 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.82 98.36 95.19 99.21 Strong Dem + 2.49 rank 5
102 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.69 93.44 93.23 96.77 Strong Dem + 2.36 rank 5
103 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.65 98.36 94.61 99.20 Strong Dem + 2.32 rank 5
104 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.61 96.72 92.40 98.41 Strong Dem + 2.28 rank 5
105 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
85.61 96.72 95.45 98.41 Strong Dem + 2.28 rank 5
106 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
85.52 96.72 96.02 98.41 Strong Dem + 2.19 rank 5
107 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.97 96.72 94.90 98.40 Strong Dem + 1.64 rank 5
108 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
84.75 96.72 95.36 98.41 Strong Dem + 1.42 rank 5
109 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
84.62 95.08 96.64 97.60 Strong Dem + 1.29 rank 5
110 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
84.59 100.00 96.06 100.00 Strong Dem + 1.26 rank 5
111 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
84.28 96.72 96.06 98.41 Leans Dem + 4.28 rank 5
112 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.21 96.72 91.71 98.41 Strong Dem + 0.88 rank 5
113 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.71 98.33 94.32 99.20 Strong Dem + 0.38 rank 5
114 Trone, David D
MD-6
83.44 93.44 96.37 96.83 Strong Dem + 0.11 rank 5
115 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
83.41 98.36 93.05 99.21 Strong Dem + 0.08 rank 5
116 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.34 96.72 92.26 98.41 Strong Dem + 0.01 rank 5
117 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
83.03 93.10 90.69 96.75 Swing + 6.36 rank 5
118 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.75 93.44 94.92 96.83 Leans Rep + 9.42 rank 5
119 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
82.71 98.36 95.81 99.20 Strong Dem - 0.62 rank 5
120 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
82.65 98.36 94.68 99.20 Strong Dem - 0.68 rank 5
121 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.63 98.36 94.02 99.21 Strong Dem - 0.70 rank 5
122 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.53 98.36 91.29 99.21 Strong Dem - 0.80 rank 5
123 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.52 93.44 92.17 96.83 Strong Dem - 0.81 rank 5
124 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.39 95.08 91.11 97.62 Strong Dem - 0.94 rank 5
125 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.30 98.36 91.25 99.21 Strong Dem - 1.03 rank 5
126 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
82.06 96.72 94.74 98.40 Strong Dem - 1.27 rank 5
127 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
82.04 100.00 95.28 100.00 Strong Dem - 1.29 rank 5
128 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
81.88 96.72 96.26 98.41 Swing + 5.21 rank 5
129 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
81.57 95.08 93.70 97.60 Strong Dem - 1.76 rank 5
130 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
81.54 95.08 95.50 97.62 Strong Dem - 1.79 rank 5
131 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
81.46 95.08 96.40 97.62 Strong Dem - 1.87 rank 5
132 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
81.27 96.72 95.52 98.40 Strong Dem - 2.06 rank 5
133 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
81.19 95.08 94.17 97.60 Strong Dem - 2.14 rank 5
134 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
81.15 95.08 95.23 97.62 Strong Dem - 2.18 rank 5
135 Price, David D
NC-4
81.10 98.36 91.01 99.21 Strong Dem - 2.23 rank 5
136 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
81.06 95.08 90.76 97.60 Strong Dem - 2.27 rank 5
137 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.65 96.72 92.38 98.41 Strong Dem - 2.68 rank 5
138 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
80.63 98.36 94.31 99.20 Strong Dem - 2.70 rank 5
139TIE Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
80.13 91.80 96.00 96.00 Leans Dem + 0.13 rank 5
139TIE Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
80.13 90.16 95.62 95.24 Leans Dem + 0.13 rank 5
139TIE Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
80.13 93.44 96.02 96.83 Strong Dem - 3.20 rank 5
142 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
80.00 96.72 95.00 98.41 Strong Dem - 3.33 rank 5
143 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
79.33 93.44 95.42 96.83 Leans Dem - 0.67 rank 5
144 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
79.24 90.16 92.71 95.24 Strong Dem - 4.09 rank 5
145 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
79.24 96.67 93.74 98.39 Swing + 2.57 rank 5
146 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
78.97 96.72 94.17 98.40 Strong Dem - 4.36 rank 5
147 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.96 96.67 93.15 98.40 Strong Dem - 4.37 rank 5
148 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
78.81 91.80 93.69 96.00 Leans Dem - 1.19 rank 5
149 Green, Al D
TX-9
78.81 100.00 92.86 100.00 Strong Dem - 4.52 rank 5
150 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.64 95.00 92.39 97.60 Leans Dem - 1.36 rank 5
151 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
78.63 95.08 91.60 97.62 Strong Dem - 4.70 rank 5
152 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.59 93.44 92.23 96.80 Swing + 1.92 rank 5
153 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
78.14 95.08 89.43 97.56 Strong Dem - 5.19 rank 5
154 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
77.68 95.08 94.41 97.60 Strong Dem - 5.65 rank 5
155 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
77.48 91.80 95.37 96.03 Swing + 0.81 rank 5
156 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
77.33 90.16 95.61 95.20 Leans Dem - 2.67 rank 5
157 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
77.17 96.72 93.27 98.41 Leans Dem - 2.83 rank 5
158 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
76.92 96.72 94.22 98.41 Strong Dem - 6.41 rank 5
159 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.84 93.44 88.54 96.83 Strong Dem - 6.49 rank 5
160 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
76.82 91.80 95.24 96.03 Leans Dem - 3.18 rank 5
161 Porter, Katie D
CA-45
76.16 95.08 94.30 97.62 Leans Dem - 3.84 rank 5
162 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
76.02 95.08 92.96 97.62 Strong Dem - 7.31 rank 5
163 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
75.83 96.72 93.52 98.41 Strong Dem - 7.50 rank 5
164 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.77 96.72 90.38 98.41 Strong Dem - 7.56 rank 5
165 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
75.50 96.72 93.71 98.41 Strong Dem - 7.83 rank 5
166 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
75.34 96.72 93.79 98.41 Strong Dem - 7.99 rank 5
167 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
75.32 90.16 94.54 95.24 Swing - 1.35 rank 5
168TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
74.83 93.44 94.85 96.83 Strong Dem - 8.50 rank 5
168TIE Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
74.83 93.44 94.73 96.83 Swing - 1.84 rank 5
170 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
74.43 96.72 91.50 98.41 Strong Dem - 8.90 rank 5
171 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
74.17 95.08 94.47 97.62 Swing - 2.50 rank 5
172 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.72 100.00 87.34 100.00 Strong Dem - 9.61 rank 5
173TIE Harder, Josh D
CA-10
73.33 91.80 94.06 96.00 Swing - 3.34 rank 5
173TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
73.33 91.67 94.58 96.00 Swing - 3.34 rank 5
175 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
73.25 95.08 91.68 97.60 Strong Dem - 10.08 rank 5
176 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
73.10 96.72 92.78 98.41 Strong Dem - 10.23 rank 5
177 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.90 98.33 87.08 99.19 Strong Dem - 10.43 rank 5
178 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
72.85 93.44 94.34 96.83 Strong Dem - 10.48 rank 5
179 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
72.22 90.16 86.38 94.44 Leans Rep - 1.11 rank 5
180 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
72.19 90.16 93.83 95.24 Leans Dem - 7.81 rank 5
181 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
72.01 95.08 90.18 97.62 Strong Dem - 11.32 rank 5
182 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
71.91 96.72 91.56 98.41 Strong Dem - 11.42 rank 5
183 González, Vicente D
TX-15
70.57 91.80 89.75 94.26 Swing - 6.10 rank 5
184 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
69.84 95.08 91.78 97.62 Leans Dem - 10.16 rank 5
185 Case, Ed D
HI-1
69.36 91.80 83.22 95.24 Strong Dem - 13.97 rank 5
186 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
69.14 100.00 89.85 100.00 Strong Dem - 14.19 rank 5
187 Scott, David D
GA-13
69.04 95.08 88.49 97.58 Strong Dem - 14.29 rank 5
188 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
68.81 93.44 90.04 96.83 Strong Dem - 14.52 rank 5
189 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
68.29 95.08 92.46 97.62 Strong Dem - 15.04 rank 5
190 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
68.08 95.08 91.38 97.56 Strong Dem - 15.25 rank 5
191 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
67.83 98.36 90.39 99.21 Strong Dem - 15.50 rank 5
192 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
67.55 88.52 92.91 94.44 Leans Dem - 12.45 rank 5
193 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
67.42 96.72 88.29 98.40 Strong Dem - 15.91 rank 5
194 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
66.78 93.44 90.59 96.83 Leans Dem - 13.22 rank 5
195 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
66.22 95.08 91.17 97.62 Swing - 10.45 rank 5
196 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
65.99 96.72 91.45 98.41 Strong Dem - 17.34 rank 5
197 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
65.78 95.08 91.90 97.62 Strong Dem - 17.55 rank 5
198 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
64.24 88.52 91.77 93.65 Leans Dem - 15.76 rank 5
199 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
64.00 91.80 89.88 95.24 Swing - 12.67 rank 5
200 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
63.58 90.16 91.00 94.44 Swing - 13.09 rank 5
201 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
63.37 95.08 85.95 97.62 Swing - 13.30 rank 5
202 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
62.72 96.67 86.81 98.39 Swing - 13.95 rank 5
203 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
62.25 93.44 91.42 96.83 Swing - 14.42 rank 5
204 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
62.16 96.67 88.21 98.40 Swing - 14.51 rank 5
205 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
61.36 95.08 87.31 97.62 Strong Dem - 21.97 rank 5
206 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.97 83.61 83.18 91.20 Leans Dem - 19.03 rank 5
207 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
60.68 96.72 88.77 98.41 Strong Dem - 22.65 rank 5
208 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.82 95.08 79.53 97.62 Strong Dem - 23.51 rank 5
209 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
59.50 95.08 88.58 97.62 Strong Dem - 23.83 rank 5
210 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
57.92 95.08 79.73 97.60 Strong Dem - 25.41 rank 5
211 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
57.80 98.36 83.38 99.21 Leans Dem - 22.20 rank 5
212 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
57.42 91.80 88.65 96.03 Leans Rep - 15.91 rank 5
213 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
56.29 91.80 85.45 96.03 Strong Dem - 27.04 rank 5
214 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
55.95 96.72 87.37 98.40 Swing - 20.72 rank 5
215 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
55.22 86.67 86.29 93.33 Leans Dem - 24.78 rank 5
216 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
52.32 88.52 88.40 93.65 Swing - 24.35 rank 5
217 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
49.66 86.89 82.77 93.65 Swing - 27.01 rank 5
218 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
46.98 67.80 84.05 79.83 Strong Rep - 23.02 rank 5
219 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
46.16 93.33 74.80 96.80 Strong Dem - 37.17 rank 5
220 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
42.03 91.80 74.67 93.65 Swing - 34.64 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)
  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)