What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2021-22 Lifetime 2021-22 % Rating
1TIE Bush, Cori D
MO-1
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Jacobs, Sara D
CA-53
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Jones, Mondaire D
NY-17
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Kahele, Kai D
HI-2
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.73 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Newman, Marie D
IL-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
9 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.48 96.15 99.10 98.63 Strong Dem + 15.15 rank 5
10 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.74 100.00 98.84 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.41 rank 5
11 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
97.64 100.00 98.98 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.31 rank 5
12 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.79 100.00 97.41 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.46 rank 5
13 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.68 100.00 98.68 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.35 rank 5
14 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
96.65 96.30 98.86 98.70 Strong Dem + 13.32 rank 5
15 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.62 96.30 98.15 98.68 Strong Dem + 13.29 rank 5
16 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.59 100.00 99.16 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
17TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
96.58 100.00 98.90 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
17TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
96.58 96.30 99.18 98.72 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
17TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
96.58 100.00 96.70 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
17TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.58 100.00 97.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
21 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.50 100.00 98.19 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.17 rank 5
22TIE Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
96.30 96.30 98.72 98.72 Strong Dem + 12.97 rank 5
22TIE Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
96.30 96.30 98.72 98.72 Strong Dem + 12.97 rank 5
22TIE Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
96.30 96.30 98.72 98.72 Strong Dem + 12.97 rank 5
25 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.23 100.00 98.84 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.90 rank 5
26 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.21 100.00 98.02 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.88 rank 5
27 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.14 96.30 98.26 98.68 Strong Dem + 12.81 rank 5
28 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.12 96.30 98.74 98.70 Strong Dem + 12.79 rank 5
29 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.67 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.34 rank 5
30 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.24 100.00 97.49 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
31 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.09 100.00 98.12 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.76 rank 5
32 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.01 100.00 98.70 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.68 rank 5
33 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.91 96.30 97.31 98.70 Strong Dem + 11.58 rank 5
34 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.89 92.59 96.68 97.26 Strong Dem + 11.56 rank 5
35 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
94.87 92.59 97.25 97.44 Strong Dem + 11.54 rank 5
36 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
93.95 100.00 97.43 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.62 rank 5
37 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.56 100.00 94.93 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.23 rank 5
38 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.32 96.30 95.59 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.99 rank 5
39TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
93.16 100.00 98.62 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.83 rank 5
39TIE Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
93.16 100.00 96.78 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.83 rank 5
39TIE Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
93.16 96.30 98.77 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.83 rank 5
42 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.09 100.00 97.83 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.76 rank 5
43 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
92.95 96.30 97.23 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.62 rank 5
44 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
92.94 100.00 96.06 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.61 rank 5
45 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
92.92 92.59 97.08 97.44 Strong Dem + 9.59 rank 5
46 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.84 96.30 95.71 98.70 Strong Dem + 9.51 rank 5
47 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
92.72 96.30 97.78 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.39 rank 5
48TIE Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
92.59 92.59 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 9.26 rank 5
48TIE Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
92.59 92.59 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 9.26 rank 5
48TIE Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
92.59 92.59 97.44 97.44 Leans Dem + 12.59 rank 5
48TIE Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
92.59 92.59 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 9.26 rank 5
52 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
92.55 96.30 97.70 98.72 Strong Dem + 9.22 rank 5
53 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.52 100.00 97.23 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.19 rank 5
54 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.42 96.30 95.80 98.70 Strong Dem + 9.09 rank 5
55 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
92.04 96.30 97.23 98.72 Strong Dem + 8.71 rank 5
56 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
91.75 100.00 97.14 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.42 rank 5
57 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
91.45 96.30 97.39 98.70 Strong Dem + 8.12 rank 5
58 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.66 92.59 94.96 97.44 Strong Dem + 7.33 rank 5
59 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
90.60 100.00 97.58 100.00 Strong Dem + 7.27 rank 5
60 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.34 92.59 96.48 97.44 Strong Dem + 7.01 rank 5
61 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
90.33 96.30 96.85 98.72 Strong Dem + 7.00 rank 5
62 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.20 100.00 96.58 100.00 Strong Dem + 6.87 rank 5
63 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.07 88.89 96.36 96.15 Strong Dem + 6.74 rank 5
64 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.91 96.30 96.14 98.72 Strong Dem + 6.58 rank 5
65 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.82 92.59 96.79 97.44 Strong Dem + 6.49 rank 5
66 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
89.74 96.30 98.35 98.72 Strong Dem + 6.41 rank 5
67 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.67 100.00 94.11 100.00 Strong Dem + 6.34 rank 5
68 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
89.57 92.59 93.60 97.44 Strong Dem + 6.24 rank 5
69 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
89.55 96.15 97.02 98.68 Strong Dem + 6.22 rank 5
70 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.54 100.00 96.15 100.00 Strong Dem + 6.21 rank 5
71 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
89.25 96.30 96.58 98.72 Swing + 12.58 rank 5
72 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.20 100.00 94.01 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.87 rank 5
73 Bourdeaux, Carolyn D
GA-7
88.89 88.89 96.15 96.15 Leans Dem + 8.89 rank 5
74 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.85 96.15 95.09 98.70 Strong Dem + 5.52 rank 5
75 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
88.78 100.00 96.82 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.45 rank 5
76 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
88.52 92.59 97.99 97.44 Strong Dem + 5.19 rank 5
77 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.00 96.30 95.69 98.72 Strong Dem + 4.67 rank 5
78 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.82 92.59 93.58 97.44 Strong Dem + 4.49 rank 5
79 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
87.80 92.59 96.83 97.44 Strong Dem + 4.47 rank 5
80 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.73 96.30 92.68 98.70 Strong Dem + 4.40 rank 5
81 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.65 96.30 96.74 98.70 Strong Dem + 4.32 rank 5
82 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.56 100.00 93.40 100.00 Strong Dem + 4.23 rank 5
83 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.49 96.30 92.62 98.72 Strong Dem + 4.16 rank 5
84 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
87.09 96.30 96.01 98.72 Strong Dem + 3.76 rank 5
85 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
87.07 96.30 97.91 98.72 Leans Dem + 7.07 rank 5
86 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.92 92.31 93.24 97.26 Strong Dem + 3.59 rank 5
87 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.78 92.59 92.97 97.44 Strong Dem + 3.45 rank 5
88 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.76 96.30 92.90 98.72 Strong Dem + 3.43 rank 5
89 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
86.76 100.00 96.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 3.43 rank 5
90 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.55 92.59 95.85 97.44 Strong Dem + 3.22 rank 5
91 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
86.42 100.00 96.39 100.00 Strong Dem + 3.09 rank 5
92 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.15 100.00 92.26 100.00 Strong Dem + 2.82 rank 5
93 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.00 96.30 92.90 98.72 Strong Dem + 2.67 rank 5
94 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
85.97 96.30 95.31 98.68 Strong Dem + 2.64 rank 5
95 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.74 96.30 95.09 98.65 Strong Dem + 2.41 rank 5
96 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.54 88.89 93.21 96.10 Strong Dem + 2.21 rank 5
97 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.50 100.00 95.16 100.00 Strong Dem + 2.17 rank 5
98 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.49 92.59 92.37 97.44 Strong Dem + 2.16 rank 5
99 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
85.41 100.00 94.59 100.00 Strong Dem + 2.08 rank 5
100 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.31 96.30 95.62 98.72 Strong Dem + 1.98 rank 5
101 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
85.01 96.30 95.42 98.72 Strong Dem + 1.68 rank 5
102 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.68 96.30 94.87 98.70 Strong Dem + 1.35 rank 5
103 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
84.62 96.30 97.53 98.72 Strong Dem + 1.29 rank 5
104 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
84.58 96.30 95.98 98.72 Strong Dem + 1.25 rank 5
105 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.10 96.30 91.69 98.72 Strong Dem + 0.77 rank 5
106 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
84.09 96.30 95.32 98.72 Strong Dem + 0.76 rank 5
107 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
83.76 100.00 97.26 100.00 Strong Dem + 0.43 rank 5
108 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.25 96.30 94.27 98.72 Strong Dem - 0.08 rank 5
109 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
83.21 100.00 93.02 100.00 Strong Dem - 0.12 rank 5
110 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.17 96.30 92.23 98.72 Strong Dem - 0.16 rank 5
111 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.94 92.59 90.67 97.44 Swing + 6.27 rank 5
112 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
82.91 96.30 97.26 98.72 Strong Dem - 0.42 rank 5
113 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
82.64 96.30 96.00 98.72 Leans Dem + 2.64 rank 5
114 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
82.56 100.00 95.94 100.00 Strong Dem - 0.77 rank 5
115 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.37 96.30 91.25 98.72 Strong Dem - 0.96 rank 5
116 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.33 88.89 92.13 96.15 Strong Dem - 1.00 rank 5
117 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.33 100.00 93.99 100.00 Strong Dem - 1.00 rank 5
118 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.23 92.59 91.08 97.44 Strong Dem - 1.10 rank 5
119 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.16 100.00 91.22 100.00 Strong Dem - 1.17 rank 5
120 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.00 88.89 94.88 96.15 Leans Rep + 8.67 rank 5
121 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
81.89 100.00 94.64 100.00 Strong Dem - 1.44 rank 5
122 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
81.26 96.30 94.70 98.70 Strong Dem - 2.07 rank 5
123 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
81.15 92.59 96.56 97.40 Strong Dem - 2.18 rank 5
124 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
81.06 92.59 93.65 97.40 Strong Dem - 2.27 rank 5
125 Price, David D
NC-4
80.94 100.00 90.97 100.00 Strong Dem - 2.39 rank 5
126 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.91 96.30 90.73 98.70 Strong Dem - 2.42 rank 5
127 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.80 92.59 94.15 97.40 Strong Dem - 2.53 rank 5
128 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
80.58 100.00 95.19 100.00 Strong Dem - 2.75 rank 5
129 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
80.46 96.30 95.68 98.70 Strong Dem - 2.87 rank 5
130 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.41 96.30 92.34 98.72 Strong Dem - 2.92 rank 5
131 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.86 92.59 95.18 97.44 Strong Dem - 3.47 rank 5
132 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
79.59 96.30 94.23 98.70 Strong Dem - 3.74 rank 5
133 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.55 92.59 95.43 97.44 Strong Dem - 3.78 rank 5
134 Trone, David D
MD-6
79.49 88.89 96.27 96.15 Strong Dem - 3.84 rank 5
135 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
79.25 96.30 95.45 98.70 Strong Dem - 4.08 rank 5
136 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.88 88.89 92.70 96.15 Strong Dem - 4.45 rank 5
137 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.67 100.00 93.13 100.00 Strong Dem - 4.66 rank 5
138 Green, Al D
TX-9
78.38 100.00 92.81 100.00 Strong Dem - 4.95 rank 5
139 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
78.34 92.59 91.56 97.44 Strong Dem - 4.99 rank 5
140 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.29 92.59 92.35 97.44 Leans Dem - 1.71 rank 5
141 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.28 88.89 92.19 96.10 Swing + 1.61 rank 5
142 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
78.06 92.59 94.10 97.40 Strong Dem - 5.27 rank 5
143 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.97 92.59 89.39 97.33 Strong Dem - 5.36 rank 5
144 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
77.39 92.59 94.83 97.44 Strong Dem - 5.94 rank 5
145 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
77.39 96.30 96.15 98.72 Swing + 0.72 rank 5
146 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
76.95 92.31 93.54 97.37 Swing + 0.28 rank 5
147 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.69 92.59 88.51 97.44 Strong Dem - 6.64 rank 5
148 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.62 92.59 93.23 97.44 Leans Dem - 3.38 rank 5
149 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
76.12 92.59 94.34 97.40 Strong Dem - 7.21 rank 5
150TIE Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
76.07 88.89 96.01 96.10 Leans Dem - 3.93 rank 5
150TIE Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
76.07 85.19 95.61 94.87 Leans Dem - 3.93 rank 5
150TIE Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
76.07 92.59 96.03 97.44 Strong Dem - 7.26 rank 5
150TIE Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
76.07 88.89 96.16 96.15 Strong Dem - 7.26 rank 5
154 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.46 96.30 90.34 98.72 Strong Dem - 7.87 rank 5
155 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
74.92 92.59 92.89 97.44 Strong Dem - 8.41 rank 5
156 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
74.73 96.30 93.45 98.72 Strong Dem - 8.60 rank 5
157 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
74.36 88.89 93.55 96.10 Leans Dem - 5.64 rank 5
158 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
74.34 96.30 94.11 98.72 Strong Dem - 8.99 rank 5
159 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
74.14 88.89 95.26 96.15 Leans Dem - 5.86 rank 5
160 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.89 96.30 91.45 98.72 Strong Dem - 9.44 rank 5
161 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.73 96.30 93.63 98.72 Strong Dem - 9.60 rank 5
162 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.42 100.00 87.27 100.00 Strong Dem - 9.91 rank 5
163 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.67 100.00 87.03 100.00 Strong Dem - 10.66 rank 5
164 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
72.65 88.89 95.34 96.15 Swing - 4.02 rank 5
165 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
72.58 92.59 91.63 97.40 Strong Dem - 10.75 rank 5
166 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
72.52 96.30 93.66 98.72 Strong Dem - 10.81 rank 5
167 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
72.41 85.19 95.60 94.81 Leans Dem - 7.59 rank 5
168 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.94 81.48 86.32 92.31 Leans Rep - 1.39 rank 5
169 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
71.85 96.30 92.71 98.72 Strong Dem - 11.48 rank 5
170 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
71.79 88.89 95.20 96.15 Leans Dem - 8.21 rank 5
171 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
71.30 92.59 90.11 97.44 Strong Dem - 12.03 rank 5
172 Porter, Katie D
CA-45
70.09 92.59 94.06 97.44 Leans Dem - 9.91 rank 5
173 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
70.00 85.19 94.45 94.87 Swing - 6.67 rank 5
174 Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
69.23 92.59 94.66 97.44 Swing - 7.44 rank 5
175 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
68.68 96.30 91.36 98.72 Strong Dem - 14.65 rank 5
176 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.56 92.59 88.43 97.40 Strong Dem - 14.77 rank 5
177 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
68.41 92.59 91.70 97.44 Leans Dem - 11.59 rank 5
178 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
68.38 88.89 94.65 96.15 Strong Dem - 14.95 rank 5
179 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
68.12 88.89 89.98 96.15 Strong Dem - 15.21 rank 5
180 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
68.11 100.00 89.74 100.00 Strong Dem - 15.22 rank 5
181 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
68.10 92.31 94.64 97.40 Swing - 8.57 rank 5
182 Case, Ed D
HI-1
68.06 85.19 82.92 94.87 Strong Dem - 15.27 rank 5
183 González, Vicente D
TX-15
67.92 92.59 89.70 96.05 Swing - 8.75 rank 5
184 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
67.52 92.59 94.25 97.44 Swing - 9.15 rank 5
185 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.92 96.30 88.23 98.70 Strong Dem - 16.41 rank 5
186 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
66.67 100.00 90.31 100.00 Strong Dem - 16.66 rank 5
187 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
66.56 92.59 91.29 97.33 Strong Dem - 16.77 rank 5
188 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
66.38 85.19 93.81 94.87 Swing - 10.29 rank 5
189 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
65.95 92.59 92.36 97.44 Strong Dem - 17.38 rank 5
190TIE Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
65.81 88.89 94.11 96.15 Strong Dem - 17.52 rank 5
190TIE McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
65.81 85.19 93.70 94.87 Leans Dem - 14.19 rank 5
192 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
63.25 92.59 91.79 97.44 Strong Dem - 20.08 rank 5
193 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
63.22 92.59 90.43 97.44 Leans Dem - 16.78 rank 5
194 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
62.39 92.59 93.13 97.44 Leans Dem - 17.61 rank 5
195 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
62.21 92.59 90.96 97.44 Swing - 14.46 rank 5
196 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
61.60 92.59 91.18 97.44 Strong Dem - 21.73 rank 5
197 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
60.81 92.59 86.63 97.40 Swing - 15.86 rank 5
198 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.27 81.48 83.14 93.51 Leans Dem - 19.73 rank 5
199 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.49 92.59 79.45 97.44 Strong Dem - 23.84 rank 5
200 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
58.91 92.59 87.10 97.44 Strong Dem - 24.42 rank 5
201 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
58.75 96.30 88.64 98.72 Strong Dem - 24.58 rank 5
202 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
57.54 92.59 88.45 97.44 Strong Dem - 25.79 rank 5
203 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
57.41 92.59 87.86 97.44 Swing - 19.26 rank 5
204 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
57.33 92.59 79.63 97.44 Strong Dem - 26.00 rank 5
205 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
56.55 92.59 85.33 97.44 Swing - 20.12 rank 5
206 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
56.41 85.19 91.64 93.59 Leans Dem - 23.59 rank 5
207 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
55.65 100.00 83.17 100.00 Leans Dem - 24.35 rank 5
208 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
55.33 85.19 88.52 94.87 Leans Rep - 18.00 rank 5
209 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
54.70 85.19 90.68 93.59 Swing - 21.97 rank 5
210 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
54.31 85.19 89.49 94.87 Swing - 22.36 rank 5
211 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
54.15 85.19 85.28 94.87 Strong Dem - 29.18 rank 5
212 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
53.79 96.30 87.22 98.70 Swing - 22.88 rank 5
213 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
52.14 88.89 90.98 96.15 Swing - 24.53 rank 5
214 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
51.89 92.59 86.29 97.37 Leans Dem - 28.11 rank 5
215 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
45.18 92.31 74.66 97.40 Strong Dem - 38.15 rank 5
216 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
44.70 85.19 82.50 94.87 Swing - 31.97 rank 5
217 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
41.88 70.37 84.64 83.12 Strong Rep - 28.12 rank 5
218 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
41.03 85.19 88.05 93.59 Swing - 35.64 rank 5
219 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
40.98 88.89 74.53 92.31 Swing - 35.69 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)
  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)