What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2023-24 Lifetime 2023-24 % Rating
1 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
98.20 99.21 99.29 99.36 Strong Dem + 14.87 rank 5
2 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.44 99.60 99.06 99.36 Strong Dem + 15.11 rank 5
3 Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.05 99.05 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
4 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
98.81 98.81 98.88 98.88 Strong Dem + 15.48 rank 5
5 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.81 98.81 98.73 98.73 Strong Dem + 15.48 rank 5
6 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
98.41 98.41 98.71 98.71 Strong Dem + 15.08 rank 5
7 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
96.94 98.02 98.61 97.45 Strong Dem + 13.61 rank 5
8 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.61 98.02 98.60 97.08 Strong Dem + 14.28 rank 5
9 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.34 97.63 98.54 96.47 Strong Dem + 15.01 rank 5
10 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.21 99.21 98.39 98.39 Strong Dem + 15.88 rank 5
11 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.52 95.26 98.35 96.15 Strong Dem + 14.19 rank 5
12 Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
97.95 98.81 98.33 98.41 Strong Dem + 14.62 rank 5
13 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.78 98.81 98.32 98.09 Strong Dem + 13.45 rank 5
14 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.93 97.63 98.28 95.71 Strong Dem + 13.60 rank 5
15 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
97.10 98.42 98.28 96.98 Strong Dem + 13.77 rank 5
16 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.76 96.44 98.18 97.45 Strong Dem + 13.43 rank 5
17 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.87 95.65 98.17 96.47 Strong Dem + 13.54 rank 5
18 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.70 96.81 98.14 97.57 Strong Dem + 13.37 rank 5
19 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
97.23 97.23 97.92 97.92 Strong Dem + 13.90 rank 5
20 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
97.62 97.62 97.92 97.92 Strong Dem + 14.29 rank 5
21 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
97.73 98.81 97.90 97.60 Strong Dem + 14.40 rank 5
22 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.08 91.02 97.88 95.27 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
23 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-7
95.79 90.72 97.86 95.40 Strong Dem + 12.46 rank 5
24 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.87 95.60 97.85 97.17 Strong Dem + 13.54 rank 5
25 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.13 98.81 97.84 97.44 Strong Dem + 11.80 rank 5
26 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.15 97.23 97.83 96.34 Strong Dem + 14.82 rank 5
27 Bush, Cori1 D
MO-1
97.16 97.77 97.81 98.31 Strong Dem + 13.83 rank 5
28 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
99.21 99.21 97.78 97.78 Strong Dem + 15.88 rank 5
29 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.98 96.43 97.77 96.80 Strong Dem + 12.65 rank 5
30 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.48 96.44 97.71 96.75 Strong Dem + 11.15 rank 5
31 Lee, Barbara D
CA-12
95.68 97.98 97.66 98.67 Strong Dem + 12.35 rank 5
32 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.12 98.81 97.59 98.56 Strong Dem + 13.79 rank 5
33 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.23 99.21 97.56 98.57 Strong Dem + 13.90 rank 5
34 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.22 97.61 97.54 97.28 Strong Dem + 13.89 rank 5
35 Bonamici, Suzanne1 D
OR-1
94.92 99.57 97.53 97.92 Strong Dem + 11.59 rank 5
36 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.84 96.43 97.46 95.84 Strong Dem + 12.51 rank 5
37 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.50 95.65 97.40 95.52 Strong Dem + 12.17 rank 5
38 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.04 99.20 97.28 98.71 Strong Dem + 13.71 rank 5
39 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.25 96.43 97.23 95.69 Strong Dem + 11.92 rank 5
40 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.85 95.26 97.19 94.44 Strong Dem + 12.52 rank 5
41 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.82 95.98 97.17 96.13 Strong Dem + 10.49 rank 5
42 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.60 96.00 97.15 97.05 Strong Dem + 10.27 rank 5
43 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.95 97.63 97.09 98.24 Strong Dem + 12.62 rank 5
44 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
94.81 96.05 97.02 95.05 Strong Dem + 11.48 rank 5
45 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
92.82 91.60 97.00 94.39 Strong Dem + 9.49 rank 5
46 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.81 97.60 96.97 96.76 Strong Dem + 9.48 rank 5
47 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
93.62 94.42 96.94 95.13 Strong Dem + 10.29 rank 5
48 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.73 94.47 96.92 94.09 Strong Dem + 10.40 rank 5
49 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.97 96.03 96.83 95.61 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
50 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.23 97.63 96.80 97.13 Strong Dem + 11.90 rank 5
51 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
98.42 98.42 96.79 96.79 Strong Dem + 15.09 rank 5
52 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
92.83 95.98 96.79 95.36 Strong Dem + 9.50 rank 5
53 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
91.30 95.22 96.70 94.84 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
54 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.49 96.84 96.67 95.69 Strong Dem + 13.16 rank 5
55 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
96.44 96.44 96.65 96.65 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
56 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.21 97.23 96.64 96.03 Strong Dem + 8.88 rank 5
57 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.61 96.83 96.61 95.37 Strong Dem + 9.28 rank 5
58 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.90 97.63 96.47 95.56 Strong Dem + 13.57 rank 5
59 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.30 95.63 96.30 94.71 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
60 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
90.51 95.63 96.25 96.12 Strong Dem + 7.18 rank 5
61 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.47 96.81 96.19 96.09 Strong Dem + 10.14 rank 5
62 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.37 92.83 96.16 94.67 Strong Dem + 7.04 rank 5
63 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
90.76 92.89 96.14 93.87 Strong Dem + 7.43 rank 5
64 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
96.84 96.84 96.03 96.03 Strong Dem + 13.51 rank 5
65 Castro, Joaquin1 D
TX-20
90.02 99.16 95.98 97.92 Strong Dem + 6.69 rank 5
66 Kildee, Dan1 D
MI-8
89.70 86.75 95.95 91.48 Swing + 13.03 rank 5
67 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.61 89.16 95.93 92.03 Strong Dem + 7.28 rank 5
68 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-31
93.03 95.20 95.90 95.29 Strong Dem + 9.70 rank 5
69 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.99 88.54 95.87 92.37 Leans Dem + 10.99 rank 5
70 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.24 97.59 95.85 96.90 Strong Dem + 9.91 rank 5
71 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.27 93.28 95.81 94.65 Strong Dem + 4.94 rank 5
72 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
89.99 92.89 95.80 94.06 Strong Dem + 6.66 rank 5
73 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
91.15 93.63 95.74 94.07 Leans Dem + 11.15 rank 5
74 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
90.43 94.84 95.71 95.03 Strong Dem + 7.10 rank 5
75 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.66 93.28 95.68 93.79 Leans Dem + 14.66 rank 5
76 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.88 96.83 95.67 95.25 Strong Dem + 6.55 rank 5
77 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
95.33 96.44 95.59 94.87 Strong Dem + 12.00 rank 5
78 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
93.58 90.76 95.53 93.04 Strong Dem + 10.25 rank 5
79 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
89.30 89.20 95.48 92.40 Strong Dem + 5.97 rank 5
80 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
93.42 89.29 95.46 92.44 Strong Dem + 10.09 rank 5
81 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.05 96.05 95.40 95.40 Strong Dem + 12.72 rank 5
82 Carson, André D
IN-7
87.91 95.63 95.31 96.00 Strong Dem + 4.58 rank 5
83 Porter, Katie D
CA-47
88.79 91.87 95.24 94.60 Swing + 12.12 rank 5
84 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.91 95.26 95.19 95.21 Strong Dem + 6.58 rank 5
85 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.55 97.63 95.17 96.01 Strong Dem + 8.22 rank 5
86 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
87.96 97.22 95.09 96.00 Strong Dem + 4.63 rank 5
87 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.26 87.65 95.07 91.19 Strong Dem + 3.93 rank 5
88 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.21 93.65 95.04 93.87 Strong Dem + 9.88 rank 5
89 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
87.60 92.89 95.04 93.47 Strong Dem + 4.27 rank 5
90 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-3
85.94 73.58 94.96 84.70 Strong Dem + 2.61 rank 5
91 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.43 92.09 94.93 93.31 Strong Dem + 3.10 rank 5
92 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
87.89 86.96 94.82 91.27 Swing + 11.22 rank 5
93 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
86.74 92.80 94.80 93.09 Strong Dem + 3.41 rank 5
94 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
92.94 94.07 94.80 94.06 Strong Dem + 9.61 rank 5
95 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
86.59 96.83 94.80 95.79 Strong Dem + 3.26 rank 5
96 Pelosi, Nancy2 D
CA-11
93.30 89.88 94.78 92.25 Strong Dem + 9.97 rank 5
97 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.75 88.10 94.71 91.32 Strong Dem + 2.42 rank 5
98 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.25 95.63 94.63 94.54 Strong Dem + 8.92 rank 5
99 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.31 92.31 94.63 94.63 Strong Dem + 8.98 rank 5
100 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
86.97 90.91 94.60 92.81 Strong Dem + 3.64 rank 5
101 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.37 93.28 94.59 94.11 Strong Dem + 4.04 rank 5
102 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
95.67 95.67 94.56 94.56 Strong Dem + 12.34 rank 5
103 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
87.72 90.91 94.49 92.38 Strong Dem + 4.39 rank 5
104 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
90.58 96.44 94.43 96.35 Strong Dem + 7.25 rank 5
105 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.26 95.26 94.41 94.41 Strong Dem + 11.93 rank 5
106 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
85.95 91.27 94.37 93.03 Strong Dem + 2.62 rank 5
107 McBath, Lucy D
GA-7
87.54 94.07 94.31 93.91 Strong Dem + 4.21 rank 5
108 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
85.64 85.26 94.31 89.97 Leans Dem + 5.64 rank 5
109 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
86.56 90.32 94.29 92.98 Strong Dem + 3.23 rank 5
110 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
84.53 86.07 94.26 90.43 Strong Dem + 1.20 rank 5
111 Mullin, Kevin D
CA-15
93.65 93.65 94.25 94.25 Strong Dem + 10.32 rank 5
112 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.90 86.00 94.25 90.46 Strong Dem + 3.57 rank 5
113 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.19 88.45 94.19 91.92 Leans Dem + 3.19 rank 5
114 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.29 90.36 94.18 92.46 Strong Dem + 7.96 rank 5
115 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
84.25 84.19 94.12 88.96 Leans Rep + 10.92 rank 5
116 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
82.74 94.47 93.90 94.44 Strong Dem - 0.59 rank 5
117 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.02 89.72 93.90 92.04 Strong Dem + 0.69 rank 5
118 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
84.13 84.71 93.85 90.69 Strong Dem + 0.80 rank 5
119 Trone, David D
MD-6
85.62 86.51 93.83 90.86 Leans Dem + 5.62 rank 5
120 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
82.31 84.62 93.80 90.03 Strong Dem - 1.02 rank 5
121 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
84.37 89.33 93.77 92.21 Strong Dem + 1.04 rank 5
122 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
88.40 92.89 93.68 93.76 Strong Dem + 5.07 rank 5
123 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
88.44 93.65 93.66 94.28 Strong Dem + 5.11 rank 5
124 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
83.87 89.72 93.66 92.46 Strong Dem + 0.54 rank 5
125 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.68 93.68 93.64 93.64 Strong Dem + 10.35 rank 5
126 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
82.19 88.14 93.42 91.07 Strong Dem - 1.14 rank 5
127 Schiff, Adam D
CA-30
85.08 92.24 93.34 93.67 Strong Dem + 1.75 rank 5
128 Larson, John D
CT-1
86.41 90.36 93.33 93.21 Strong Dem + 3.08 rank 5
129 Green, Al D
TX-9
81.92 93.65 93.27 94.56 Strong Dem - 1.41 rank 5
130 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-16
87.55 93.65 93.19 94.24 Strong Dem + 4.22 rank 5
131 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.64 86.17 93.18 90.75 Leans Dem - 0.36 rank 5
132 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
87.00 96.03 93.18 95.18 Strong Dem + 3.67 rank 5
133 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
92.09 92.09 93.17 93.17 Strong Dem + 8.76 rank 5
134 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.74 96.43 93.12 96.77 Strong Dem + 5.41 rank 5
135 Garamendi, John D
CA-8
83.17 93.25 93.06 93.14 Strong Dem - 0.16 rank 5
136 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
84.15 80.72 93.05 87.12 Leans Dem + 4.15 rank 5
137 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
79.46 87.30 92.94 91.35 Strong Dem - 3.87 rank 5
138 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
88.18 92.80 92.90 94.44 Strong Dem + 4.85 rank 5
139 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
82.16 82.54 92.87 89.68 Leans Dem + 2.16 rank 5
140 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.68 97.23 92.79 96.34 Strong Dem + 3.35 rank 5
141 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
81.27 82.21 92.73 88.25 Strong Dem - 2.06 rank 5
142 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
79.09 94.47 92.72 94.11 Strong Dem - 4.24 rank 5
143 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
82.53 83.00 92.65 88.73 Swing + 5.86 rank 5
144 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
84.78 93.68 92.62 94.37 Strong Dem + 1.45 rank 5
145 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
80.74 88.14 92.55 88.87 Strong Dem - 2.59 rank 5
146 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.77 90.51 92.39 92.54 Strong Dem + 0.44 rank 5
147 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.14 88.14 92.37 92.37 Strong Dem + 4.81 rank 5
148 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.33 80.77 92.29 87.60 Strong Dem + 3.00 rank 5
149 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
78.52 93.68 92.28 94.49 Strong Dem - 4.81 rank 5
150 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
82.71 88.80 92.13 91.03 Strong Dem - 0.62 rank 5
151 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
77.09 92.09 92.07 93.45 Strong Dem - 6.24 rank 5
152 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.11 82.54 92.07 88.21 Strong Dem - 2.22 rank 5
153 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
83.54 83.40 92.03 86.38 Strong Dem + 0.21 rank 5
154 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
76.94 87.55 92.02 91.15 Leans Dem - 3.06 rank 5
155 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
88.14 88.14 91.84 91.84 Swing + 11.47 rank 5
156 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
80.44 88.93 91.83 91.97 Strong Dem - 2.89 rank 5
157 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
85.83 81.82 91.79 88.66 Leans Dem + 5.83 rank 5
158 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
79.72 77.47 91.68 86.61 Swing + 3.05 rank 5
159 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.66 94.84 91.66 94.86 Strong Dem + 0.33 rank 5
160 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
80.10 79.68 91.66 86.75 Swing + 3.43 rank 5
161 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
83.52 95.26 91.63 94.90 Strong Dem + 0.19 rank 5
162 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
79.58 83.40 91.53 89.01 Strong Dem - 3.75 rank 5
163 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
83.68 92.46 91.46 92.96 Strong Dem + 0.35 rank 5
164 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
78.49 68.80 91.41 80.67 Strong Dem - 4.84 rank 5
165 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
79.55 78.26 91.31 85.23 Swing + 2.88 rank 5
166 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
83.02 84.13 91.21 86.96 Strong Dem - 0.31 rank 5
167 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
86.11 86.11 91.17 91.17 Strong Dem + 2.78 rank 5
168 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
75.78 90.91 91.17 92.81 Strong Dem - 7.55 rank 5
169 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
82.53 93.25 91.16 93.61 Strong Dem - 0.80 rank 5
170 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
85.48 85.48 91.11 91.11 Strong Dem + 2.15 rank 5
171 Pettersen, Brittany D
CO-7
86.90 86.90 91.08 91.08 Strong Dem + 3.57 rank 5
172 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
88.93 88.93 90.95 90.95 Leans Dem + 8.93 rank 5
173 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
78.24 90.80 90.84 92.98 Strong Dem - 5.09 rank 5
174 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
73.76 57.14 90.69 62.07 Swing - 2.91 rank 5
175 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
76.42 87.70 90.59 91.37 Strong Dem - 6.91 rank 5
176 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
78.36 79.12 90.57 84.79 Leans Dem - 1.64 rank 5
177 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
79.07 75.89 90.57 83.17 Leans Dem - 0.93 rank 5
178 Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
83.51 77.38 90.55 86.31 Strong Dem + 0.18 rank 5
179 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
74.76 88.10 90.38 91.11 Strong Dem - 8.57 rank 5
180 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
73.21 92.49 90.18 93.31 Strong Dem - 10.12 rank 5
181 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
93.42 93.42 89.86 89.86 Strong Dem + 10.09 rank 5
182 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
71.53 89.72 89.80 92.36 Strong Dem - 11.80 rank 5
183 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
79.32 89.56 89.75 91.62 Strong Dem - 4.01 rank 5
184 Jackson, Jeff D
NC-14
82.94 82.94 89.47 89.47 Strong Dem - 0.39 rank 5
185 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-7
75.35 80.24 89.34 87.94 Swing - 1.32 rank 5
186 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
71.41 91.63 88.98 93.24 Strong Dem - 11.92 rank 5
187 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.36 87.30 88.93 90.18 Strong Dem - 10.97 rank 5
188 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
77.61 79.45 88.74 87.32 Leans Rep + 4.28 rank 5
189 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
72.48 84.86 88.67 89.84 Strong Dem - 10.85 rank 5
190 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
73.18 80.24 88.61 87.22 Leans Dem - 6.82 rank 5
191 González, Vicente D
TX-34
77.29 80.08 88.47 82.11 Strong Dem - 6.04 rank 5
192 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
75.00 77.69 88.24 81.76 Leans Dem - 5.00 rank 5
193 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
76.36 95.24 88.23 95.02 Strong Dem - 6.97 rank 5
194 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
81.03 81.03 88.16 88.16 Leans Dem + 1.03 rank 5
195 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.03 81.03 87.94 87.94 Strong Dem - 2.30 rank 5
196 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
80.24 80.24 87.42 87.42 Leans Dem + 0.24 rank 5
197 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
79.48 78.66 87.10 86.01 Swing + 2.81 rank 5
198 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
67.87 86.56 86.97 90.75 Strong Dem - 15.46 rank 5
199 Nickel III, Wiley D
NC-13
81.03 81.03 86.90 86.90 Swing + 4.36 rank 5
200 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
79.84 79.84 86.33 86.33 Leans Dem - 0.16 rank 5
201 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.19 84.58 85.94 89.49 Strong Dem - 8.14 rank 5
202 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
77.87 77.87 85.28 85.28 Swing + 1.20 rank 5
203 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
65.79 73.71 84.60 84.17 Leans Dem - 14.21 rank 5
204 Caraveo, Yadira D
CO-8
76.61 76.61 83.90 83.90 Swing - 0.06 rank 5
205 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
73.71 73.71 83.55 83.55 Leans Dem - 6.29 rank 5
206 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
62.82 90.12 80.70 91.37 Leans Dem - 17.18 rank 5
207 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
64.93 69.72 79.88 70.00 Leans Rep - 8.40 rank 5
208 Peltola, Mary5 D
AK-AL
73.99 72.60 77.54 75.25 Leans Rep + 0.66 rank 5
209 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
53.02 77.91 76.45 83.69 Strong Dem - 30.31 rank 5
210 Davis, Don D
NC-1
69.05 69.05 76.23 76.23 Leans Dem - 10.95 rank 5
211 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.07 72.73 75.74 77.10 Leans Dem - 30.93 rank 5
212 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
71.54 71.54 73.57 73.57 Leans Rep - 1.79 rank 5
213 Fitzpatrick, Brian R
PA-1
23.45 28.06 35.38 40.95 Swing - 53.22 rank 5
214 Van Drew, Jeff R
NJ-2
5.38 1.19 28.90 4.31 Leans Rep - 67.95 rank 5
215 Chavez-DeRemer, Lori R
OR-5
10.32 10.32 27.50 27.50 Leans Dem - 69.68 rank 5
216 Lawler, Mike R
NY-17
5.56 5.56 26.39 26.39 Swing - 71.11 rank 5
217 Kean Jr., Tom R
NJ-7
4.74 4.74 25.40 25.40 Swing - 71.93 rank 5
218 Kiley, Kevin R
CA-3
1.58 1.58 21.75 21.75 Leans Rep - 71.75 rank 5
219 Molinaro, Marc R
NY-19
3.95 3.95 20.97 20.97 Swing - 72.72 rank 5
220 D'Esposito, Anthony R
NY-4
0.79 0.79 20.72 20.72 Leans Dem - 79.21 rank 5
221 Smith, Chris R
NJ-4
14.65 3.56 20.60 15.38 Strong Rep - 55.35 rank 5
222 Kiggans, Jen R
VA-2
1.99 1.99 20.33 20.33 Swing - 74.68 rank 5
223 Ciscomani, Juan R
AZ-6
0.00 0.00 19.55 19.55 Swing - 76.67 rank 5
224 LaLota, Nick R
NY-1
1.58 1.58 19.49 19.49 Leans Rep - 71.75 rank 5
225 James, John R
MI-10
1.99 1.99 18.62 18.62 Swing - 74.68 rank 5
226 Kim, Young R
CA-40
2.26 1.98 17.60 21.73 Strong Rep - 67.74 rank 5
227 Garbarino, Andrew R
NY-2
1.65 1.20 17.58 21.04 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
228 Nunn, Zachary R
IA-3
4.35 4.35 17.50 17.50 Swing - 72.32 rank 5
229 Salazar, Maria R
FL-27
1.67 1.21 16.78 18.11 Leans Rep - 71.66 rank 5
230 Edwards, Chuck R
NC-11
0.40 0.40 15.45 15.45 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
231 Mace, Nancy R
SC-1
8.44 10.71 15.25 18.82 Strong Rep - 61.56 rank 5
232 Obernolte, Jay R
CA-23
1.65 0.40 14.11 17.82 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
233 Stefanik, Elise R
NY-21
7.69 0.79 13.07 5.24 Strong Rep - 62.31 rank 5
234 Bacon, Don R
NE-2
3.31 1.98 12.69 21.94 Swing - 73.36 rank 5
235 Massie, Thomas R
KY-4
20.66 11.90 12.60 9.00 Strong Rep - 49.34 rank 5
236 Lee, Laurel R
FL-15
0.79 0.79 11.94 11.94 Strong Rep - 69.21 rank 5
237 Joyce, David R
OH-14
4.97 2.01 11.91 19.62 Strong Rep - 65.03 rank 5
238 Hinson, Ashley R
IA-2
0.82 0.00 11.87 15.20 Leans Rep - 72.51 rank 5
239 Williams, Brandon R
NY-22
0.80 0.80 11.85 11.85 Swing - 75.87 rank 5
240 Turner, Mike R
OH-10
4.02 3.63 11.76 21.22 Leans Rep - 69.31 rank 5
241 Diaz-Balart, Mario R
FL-26
6.27 0.00 11.70 15.68 Strong Rep - 63.73 rank 5
242 Flood, Mike R
NE-1
0.66 0.79 11.34 13.22 Strong Rep - 69.34 rank 5
243 Miller-Meeks, Mariannette R
IA-1
1.44 1.58 11.08 12.34 Leans Rep - 71.89 rank 5
244 Giménez, Carlos R
FL-28
0.82 0.00 11.07 11.24 Strong Rep - 69.18 rank 5
245 Steele, Michelle R
CA-45
1.44 1.19 10.99 14.65 Swing - 75.23 rank 5
246 Malliotakis, Nicole R
NY-11
2.28 2.42 10.98 9.24 Strong Rep - 67.72 rank 5
247 Gonzales, Tony R
TX-23
2.07 2.00 10.94 12.31 Leans Rep - 71.26 rank 5
248 Duarte, John R
CA-13
2.38 2.38 10.69 10.69 Swing - 74.29 rank 5
249 Garcia, Mike R
CA-27
1.98 1.19 10.68 12.88 Leans Dem - 78.02 rank 5
250 Moore, Blake R
UT-1
1.23 1.19 10.67 14.08 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
251 Van Orden, Derrick R
WI-3
1.98 1.98 10.54 10.54 Leans Rep - 71.35 rank 5
252 Valadao, David R
CA-22
3.66 0.81 10.35 20.87 Swing - 73.01 rank 5
253 Miller, Max R
OH-7
2.41 2.41 10.23 10.23 Strong Rep - 67.59 rank 5
254 Stauber, Pete R
MN-8
2.60 1.19 9.92 4.49 Strong Rep - 67.40 rank 5
255 Simpson, Mike R
ID-2
3.68 1.19 9.80 19.90 Strong Rep - 66.32 rank 5
256 Newhouse, Dan R
WA-4
3.20 1.20 8.91 16.86 Strong Rep - 66.80 rank 5
257 Thompson, Glenn R
PA-15
3.80 1.19 8.85 14.67 Strong Rep - 66.20 rank 5
258 Buchanan, Vern R
FL-16
5.84 0.40 8.63 8.72 Strong Rep - 64.16 rank 5
259 Cole, Tom R
OK-4
2.98 0.79 8.32 18.60 Strong Rep - 67.02 rank 5
260 Letlow, Julia R
LA-5
0.22 0.00 8.27 11.22 Strong Rep - 69.78 rank 5
261 Gaetz, Matt R
FL-1
8.03 8.70 7.93 7.51 Strong Rep - 61.97 rank 5
262 Rogers, Hal R
KY-5
2.59 0.40 7.79 17.26 Strong Rep - 67.41 rank 5
263 Mast, Brian R
FL-21
4.99 2.39 7.77 3.69 Strong Rep - 65.01 rank 5
264 Bice, Stephanie R
OK-5
0.41 0.40 7.60 10.51 Strong Rep - 69.59 rank 5
265 Ellzey, Jake R
TX-6
0.52 0.40 7.54 10.37 Strong Rep - 69.48 rank 5
266 Baird, Jim R
IN-4
0.87 1.58 7.48 15.61 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
267 Moran, Nathaniel R
TX-1
0.40 0.40 7.36 7.36 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
268 Griffith, Morgan R
VA-9
11.77 4.38 7.25 6.45 Strong Rep - 58.23 rank 5
269 Langworthy, Nick R
NY-23
2.41 2.41 7.13 7.13 Strong Rep - 67.59 rank 5
270 Crenshaw, Dan R
TX-2
1.39 0.80 6.95 9.15 Strong Rep - 68.61 rank 5
271 Calvert, Ken R
CA-41
1.46 0.00 6.85 17.81 Leans Rep - 71.87 rank 5
272 Bost, Mike R
IL-12
3.19 1.58 6.79 3.02 Strong Rep - 66.81 rank 5
273 Carey, Mike R
OH-15
2.25 2.37 6.79 6.87 Leans Rep - 71.08 rank 5
274 Rogers, Mike R
AL-3
3.15 1.19 6.72 8.49 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
275 Armstrong, Kelly R
ND-AL
2.43 1.59 6.71 8.83 Strong Rep - 67.57 rank 5
276 Steil, Bryan R
WI-1
2.43 0.40 6.64 6.25 Leans Rep - 70.90 rank 5
277 Womack, Steve R
AR-3
1.78 0.79 6.58 17.94 Strong Rep - 68.22 rank 5
278 Owens, Burgess R
UT-4
1.23 1.98 6.44 8.59 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
279 Amodei, Mark R
NV-2
2.63 0.00 6.15 9.55 Strong Rep - 67.37 rank 5
280 Zinke, Ryan R
MT-1
4.67 1.98 6.15 6.36 Leans Rep - 68.66 rank 5
281 Rutherford, John R
FL-5
0.97 0.40 6.10 7.19 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
282 Kelly, Mike R
PA-16
1.72 0.00 6.08 12.33 Strong Rep - 68.28 rank 5
283 Roy, Chip R
TX-21
6.11 4.38 6.06 4.67 Strong Rep - 63.89 rank 5
284 Waltz, Michael R
FL-6
1.92 0.00 6.02 1.67 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
285 Aderholt, Robert R
AL-4
2.59 0.79 5.96 6.27 Strong Rep - 67.41 rank 5
286 Posey, Bill R
FL-8
7.32 2.78 5.82 3.74 Strong Rep - 62.68 rank 5
287 Lucas, Frank R
OK-3
1.95 0.00 5.79 18.32 Strong Rep - 68.05 rank 5
288 Biggs, Andy R
AZ-5
9.50 8.70 5.67 6.68 Strong Rep - 60.50 rank 5
289 Wagner, Ann R
MO-2
1.36 0.00 5.67 15.25 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
290 Bilirakis, Gus R
FL-12
3.15 3.16 5.65 4.47 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
291 Bucshon, Larry R
IN-8
1.32 0.40 5.61 17.37 Strong Rep - 68.68 rank 5
292 Curtis, John R
UT-3
2.28 2.38 5.57 10.79 Strong Rep - 67.72 rank 5
293 Reschenthaler, Guy R
PA-14
0.87 0.79 5.54 2.70 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
294 LaTurner, Jake R
KS-2
0.21 0.40 5.45 8.45 Strong Rep - 69.79 rank 5
295 Crane, Eli R
AZ-2
5.93 5.93 5.43 5.43 Leans Rep - 67.40 rank 5
296 Granger, Kay R
TX-12
2.02 0.00 5.32 10.62 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
297 Bergman, Jack R
MI-1
2.75 0.79 5.32 6.07 Strong Rep - 67.25 rank 5
298 Graves, Garret R
LA-6
3.53 1.59 5.27 8.29 Strong Rep - 66.47 rank 5
299 De la Cruz-Hernandez, Monica R
TX-15
0.40 0.40 5.25 5.25 Leans Rep - 72.93 rank 5
300 McClintock, Tom R
CA-5
10.62 4.35 5.24 4.30 Strong Rep - 59.38 rank 5
301 Pence, Greg R
IN-6
1.05 0.00 5.02 8.38 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
302 McCaul, Michael R
TX-10
2.09 0.80 4.95 10.75 Strong Rep - 67.91 rank 5
303 Schweikert, Dave R
AZ-1
7.11 2.77 4.93 6.39 Swing - 69.56 rank 5
304 Rosendale, Matt R
MT-2
4.93 6.72 4.87 5.56 Strong Rep - 65.07 rank 5
305 Fleischmann, Chuck R
TN-3
1.26 1.98 4.79 17.36 Strong Rep - 68.74 rank 5
306 Spartz, Victoria R
IN-5
3.30 4.38 4.78 5.02 Strong Rep - 66.70 rank 5
307 Boebert, Lauren R
CO-3
4.14 4.00 4.70 4.26 Leans Rep - 69.19 rank 5
308 Emmer, Tom R
MN-6
3.30 1.59 4.64 2.54 Strong Rep - 66.70 rank 5
309 Wittman, Rob R
VA-1
3.37 0.00 4.64 3.51 Leans Rep - 69.96 rank 5
310 Gosar, Paul R
AZ-9
6.61 3.23 4.62 4.30 Strong Rep - 63.39 rank 5
311 Greene, Marjorie R
GA-14
4.33 4.37 4.60 4.39 Strong Rep - 65.67 rank 5
312 Moolenaar, John R
MI-2
1.70 2.38 4.47 7.00 Strong Rep - 68.30 rank 5
313 Hill, French R
AR-2
2.15 0.40 4.45 8.44 Strong Rep - 67.85 rank 5
314 Meuser, Dan R
PA-9
1.39 1.59 4.43 5.98 Strong Rep - 68.61 rank 5
315 Bentz, Cliff R
OR-2
1.03 1.58 4.42 6.04 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
316 Yakym III, Rudy R
IN-2
1.92 1.98 4.40 4.29 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
317 Guthrie, Brett R
KY-2
1.09 0.00 4.37 7.30 Strong Rep - 68.91 rank 5
318 Good, Bob R
VA-5
3.94 4.78 4.28 4.79 Strong Rep - 66.06 rank 5
319 Tenney, Claudia R
NY-24
1.76 0.79 4.25 3.83 Strong Rep - 68.24 rank 5
320 Carter, John R
TX-31
1.55 0.00 4.25 8.51 Strong Rep - 68.45 rank 5
321 Balderson, Troy R
OH-12
0.51 0.40 4.25 4.44 Strong Rep - 69.49 rank 5
322 Burchett, Tim R
TN-2
5.20 6.72 4.22 5.08 Strong Rep - 64.80 rank 5
323 Smucker, Lloyd R
PA-11
1.80 1.19 4.21 5.10 Strong Rep - 68.20 rank 5
324 Davidson, Warren R
OH-8
6.09 2.38 4.19 3.67 Strong Rep - 63.91 rank 5
325 Johnson, Dusty R
SD-AL
1.04 0.40 4.17 3.82 Strong Rep - 68.96 rank 5
326 Luna, Anna R
FL-13
3.24 3.24 4.16 4.16 Leans Rep - 70.09 rank 5
327 McMorris Rodgers, Cathy R
WA-5
2.31 0.40 4.12 3.74 Strong Rep - 67.69 rank 5
328 Crawford, Rick R
AR-1
1.86 1.58 4.07 6.40 Strong Rep - 68.14 rank 5
329 Maloy, Celeste R
UT-2
2.82 2.82 4.07 4.07 Strong Rep - 67.18 rank 5
330 Burgess, Mike R
TX-26
4.21 0.79 4.02 4.62 Strong Rep - 65.79 rank 5
331 Feenstra, Randy R
IA-4
0.82 0.40 4.01 4.76 Strong Rep - 69.18 rank 5
332 Harris, Andy R
MD-1
5.82 2.78 4.01 3.19 Strong Rep - 64.18 rank 5
333 Fry, Russell R
SC-7
3.16 3.16 3.98 3.98 Strong Rep - 66.84 rank 5
334 Murphy, Greg R
NC-3
0.57 0.40 3.96 5.29 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
335 Graves, Sam R
MO-6
2.51 1.58 3.94 5.73 Strong Rep - 67.49 rank 5
336 LaHood, Darin R
IL-16
1.37 0.40 3.84 8.03 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
337 Perry, Scott R
PA-10
6.94 2.78 3.83 3.57 Leans Rep - 66.39 rank 5
338 Webster, Dan R
FL-11
2.89 1.59 3.79 3.60 Strong Rep - 67.11 rank 5
339 Dunn, Neal R
FL-2
0.56 0.40 3.73 7.51 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
340 Issa, Darrell R
CA-48
2.01 3.16 3.73 6.27 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
341 Mooney, Alex R
WV-2
4.80 1.22 3.65 1.81 Strong Rep - 65.20 rank 5
342 Luetkemeyer, Blaine R
MO-3
0.97 0.41 3.46 4.93 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
343 Bishop, Dan R
NC-8
4.57 3.61 3.45 4.43 Strong Rep - 65.43 rank 5
344 Mills, Cory R
FL-7
1.98 1.98 3.36 3.36 Strong Rep - 68.02 rank 5
345 Huizenga, Bill R
MI-4
3.40 0.40 3.27 5.29 Leans Rep - 69.93 rank 5
346 Barr, Andy R
KY-6
1.53 0.00 3.24 4.94 Strong Rep - 68.47 rank 5
347TIE Brecheen, Josh R
OK-2
3.17 3.17 3.18 3.18 Strong Rep - 66.83 rank 5
347TIE McCormick, Rich R
GA-6
0.40 0.40 3.18 3.18 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
349 Ogles IV, Andy R
TN-5
2.79 2.79 3.08 3.08 Strong Rep - 67.21 rank 5
350 Cloud, Michael R
TX-27
3.83 2.77 3.05 3.03 Strong Rep - 66.17 rank 5
351 Burlison, Eric R
MO-7
3.16 3.16 3.03 3.03 Strong Rep - 66.84 rank 5
352 Hudson, Richard R
NC-9
1.83 0.40 3.00 5.19 Strong Rep - 68.17 rank 5
353 Guest, Michael R
MS-3
0.87 0.79 2.99 3.51 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
354 McHenry, Patrick R
NC-10
1.54 0.40 2.95 5.40 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
355 Grothman, Glenn R
WI-6
3.90 0.79 2.90 1.60 Strong Rep - 66.10 rank 5
356 Strong, Dale R
AL-5
0.40 0.40 2.88 2.88 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
357 Collins, Mike R
GA-10
2.77 2.77 2.87 2.87 Strong Rep - 67.23 rank 5
358 Scott, Austin R
GA-8
1.99 0.79 2.86 10.33 Strong Rep - 68.01 rank 5
359 Hageman, Harriet R
WY-AL
2.77 2.77 2.86 2.86 Strong Rep - 67.23 rank 5
360 Miller, Mary R
IL-15
1.86 2.77 2.84 2.86 Strong Rep - 68.14 rank 5
361 Ezell, Mike R
MS-4
0.00 0.00 2.80 2.80 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
362 Walberg, Timothy R
MI-5
1.61 0.00 2.78 6.20 Strong Rep - 68.39 rank 5
363 Duncan, Jeff R
SC-3
4.45 2.39 2.74 1.75 Strong Rep - 65.55 rank 5
364 McClain, Lisa R
MI-9
0.00 0.00 2.68 2.87 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
365 DesJarlais, Scott R
TN-4
2.84 1.60 2.68 2.90 Strong Rep - 67.16 rank 5
366 Steube, Greg R
FL-17
2.65 2.46 2.67 2.83 Strong Rep - 67.35 rank 5
367 Hunt, Wesley R
TX-38
2.07 2.07 2.64 2.64 Strong Rep - 67.93 rank 5
368 Cammack, Kat R
FL-3
1.65 2.39 2.62 2.43 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
369 LaMalfa, Doug R
CA-1
1.99 1.98 2.61 2.60 Strong Rep - 68.01 rank 5
370 Foxx, Virginia R
NC-5
2.68 1.58 2.59 3.35 Strong Rep - 67.32 rank 5
371 Comer, James R
KY-1
3.99 2.77 2.59 2.23 Strong Rep - 66.01 rank 5
372 Wenstrup, Brad R
OH-2
1.71 0.00 2.59 4.61 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
373 Tiffany, Tom R
WI-7
2.58 2.77 2.58 2.71 Strong Rep - 67.42 rank 5
374 Kustoff, David R
TN-8
0.42 0.00 2.55 5.84 Strong Rep - 69.58 rank 5
375 Self, Keith R
TX-3
1.98 1.98 2.54 2.54 Strong Rep - 68.02 rank 5
376 Carl, Jerry R
AL-1
0.21 0.00 2.51 2.38 Strong Rep - 69.79 rank 5
377 Mann, Tracey R
KS-1
1.85 2.77 2.50 3.65 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
378 Nehls, Troy R
TX-22
2.28 2.78 2.48 3.12 Strong Rep - 67.72 rank 5
379 Miller, Carol R
WV-1
1.05 1.19 2.47 1.94 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
380 Higgins, Clay R
LA-3
2.96 2.37 2.39 2.41 Strong Rep - 67.04 rank 5
381 Jordan, Jim R
OH-4
4.70 2.78 2.36 1.92 Strong Rep - 65.30 rank 5
382 Norman, Ralph R
SC-5
3.56 2.78 2.35 3.72 Strong Rep - 66.44 rank 5
383 Cline, Ben R
VA-6
2.94 2.77 2.33 2.38 Strong Rep - 67.06 rank 5
384 Finstad, Brad R
MN-1
2.26 2.38 2.33 2.07 Strong Rep - 67.74 rank 5
385 Wilson, Joe R
SC-2
1.71 0.40 2.32 3.83 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
386 Smith, Adrian R
NE-3
1.23 0.00 2.26 4.49 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
387 Bean, Aaron R
FL-4
2.77 2.77 2.23 2.23 Strong Rep - 67.23 rank 5
388 Alford, Mark R
MO-4
0.79 0.79 2.23 2.23 Strong Rep - 69.21 rank 5
389 Ferguson, Drew R
GA-3
1.24 1.19 2.21 4.13 Strong Rep - 68.76 rank 5
390 Donalds, Byron R
FL-19
1.85 2.37 2.20 2.72 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
391 Joyce, John R
PA-13
0.52 0.79 2.19 2.86 Strong Rep - 69.48 rank 5
392 Rouzer, David R
NC-7
1.47 0.00 2.13 2.71 Strong Rep - 68.53 rank 5
393 Moore, Barry R
AL-2
1.85 3.16 2.10 2.70 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
394 Fischbach, Michelle R
MN-7
1.44 2.37 2.09 2.23 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
395 Gooden, Lance R
TX-5
2.25 1.98 2.07 1.91 Strong Rep - 67.75 rank 5
396 Carter, Buddy R
GA-1
1.14 0.40 2.07 3.66 Strong Rep - 68.86 rank 5
397 Arrington , Jodey R
TX-19
1.93 1.98 2.02 3.70 Strong Rep - 68.07 rank 5
398 Johnson, Mike4 R
LA-4
1.95 0.99 1.97 1.06 Strong Rep - 68.05 rank 5
399 Latta, Bob R
OH-5
0.87 0.40 1.92 5.40 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
400 Luttrell, Morgan R
TX-8
1.58 1.58 1.92 1.92 Strong Rep - 68.42 rank 5
401 Rose, John R
TN-6
0.69 0.00 1.88 2.56 Strong Rep - 69.31 rank 5
402 Weber, Randy R
TX-14
2.62 2.37 1.85 1.76 Strong Rep - 67.38 rank 5
403 Fulcher, Russ R
ID-1
1.73 1.19 1.81 2.06 Strong Rep - 68.27 rank 5
404 Clyde, Andrew R
GA-9
1.44 1.98 1.77 2.39 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
405 Scalise, Steve R
LA-1
1.58 0.41 1.75 2.03 Strong Rep - 68.42 rank 5
406 Westerman, Bruce R
AR-4
1.36 1.58 1.75 3.97 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
407 Banks, Jim R
IN-3
1.80 1.59 1.73 3.05 Strong Rep - 68.20 rank 5
408 Lesko, Debbie R
AZ-8
0.49 0.00 1.71 1.57 Strong Rep - 69.51 rank 5
409 Green, Mark R
TN-7
1.57 1.99 1.68 1.93 Strong Rep - 68.43 rank 5
410 Smith, Jason R
MO-8
1.94 1.20 1.68 2.91 Strong Rep - 68.06 rank 5
411 Sessions, Pete R
TX-17
0.97 0.00 1.66 2.99 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
412 Timmons, William R
SC-4
1.05 1.58 1.60 2.07 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
413 Loudermilk, Barry R
GA-11
2.64 1.59 1.57 1.78 Strong Rep - 67.36 rank 5
414 Williams, Roger R
TX-25
1.19 0.40 1.53 0.84 Strong Rep - 68.81 rank 5
415 Harshbarger, Diana R
TN-1
1.44 2.77 1.50 2.38 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
416 Lamborn, Doug R
CO-5
1.76 0.40 1.43 2.40 Strong Rep - 68.24 rank 5
417 Van Duyne, Beth R
TX-24
0.83 1.20 1.43 1.28 Strong Rep - 69.17 rank 5
418 Houchin, Erin R
IN-9
0.00 0.00 1.43 1.43 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
419 Fitzgerald, Scott R
WI-5
1.44 2.37 1.42 1.75 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
420 Hern, Kevin R
OK-1
1.03 0.79 1.29 1.59 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
421 Fallon, Pat R
TX-4
1.23 1.98 1.27 1.62 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
422 Kelly, Trent R
MS-1
1.20 0.00 1.26 1.27 Strong Rep - 68.80 rank 5
423 Palmer, Gary R
AL-6
2.05 1.59 1.24 1.61 Strong Rep - 67.95 rank 5
424 Estes, Ron R
KS-4
0.57 0.40 1.22 1.59 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
425 Pfluger, August R
TX-11
0.00 0.00 1.19 2.08 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
426 Babin, Brian R
TX-36
1.26 0.80 1.02 0.80 Strong Rep - 68.74 rank 5
427 Franklin, Scott R
FL-18
0.00 0.00 1.01 1.27 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
428 Allen, Rick R
GA-12
0.91 1.19 0.93 2.39 Strong Rep - 69.09 rank 5
429 Jackson, Ronny R
TX-13
0.42 0.80 0.68 0.81 Strong Rep - 69.58 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

4Mike Johnson's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

5Absences due to sudden death of husband not included in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)
  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)