What: All Issues
 Who: Senate
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2023-24 Lifetime 2023-24 % Rating
1TIE Helmy, George D
NJ
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
1TIE Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.29 99.29 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
3 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
99.14 99.14 99.17 99.17 Strong Dem + 15.81 rank 5
4 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.14 99.14 98.57 98.57 Strong Dem + 15.81 rank 5
5 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.85 98.85 98.94 98.94 Strong Dem + 15.52 rank 5
6 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
98.85 98.85 99.05 99.05 Strong Dem + 15.52 rank 5
7 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.46 97.99 98.16 97.28 Strong Dem + 15.13 rank 5
8 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
98.28 98.28 97.76 97.76 Strong Dem + 14.95 rank 5
9 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.06 97.95 98.97 98.78 Strong Dem + 14.73 rank 5
10 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.05 97.13 98.44 96.67 Strong Dem + 14.72 rank 5
11 Hirono, Mazie D
HI
98.00 99.44 98.08 99.36 Strong Dem + 14.67 rank 5
12 Warren, Elizabeth D
MA
97.84 98.32 98.88 99.14 Strong Dem + 14.51 rank 5
13 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.54 97.71 98.53 97.13 Strong Dem + 14.21 rank 5
14 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.47 97.98 97.75 97.85 Strong Dem + 14.14 rank 5
15 Markey, Ed D
MA
97.46 94.38 98.65 97.61 Strong Dem + 14.13 rank 5
16 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.32 98.85 97.71 98.69 Strong Dem + 13.99 rank 5
17 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.31 99.13 97.51 98.91 Strong Dem + 13.98 rank 5
18 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.19 99.14 97.63 98.82 Strong Dem + 13.86 rank 5
19 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.17 96.53 98.03 97.80 Strong Dem + 13.84 rank 5
20 Watson Coleman, Bonnie1 D
NJ-12
97.01 98.04 98.63 97.73 Strong Dem + 13.68 rank 5
21 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.95 97.70 98.13 96.80 Strong Dem + 13.62 rank 5
22 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.86 95.98 98.17 96.90 Strong Dem + 13.53 rank 5
23 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.78 98.28 98.31 98.11 Strong Dem + 13.45 rank 5
24 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.76 96.56 98.18 97.64 Strong Dem + 13.43 rank 5
25 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.74 96.85 98.18 95.88 Strong Dem + 13.41 rank 5
26 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.74 97.11 98.14 97.72 Strong Dem + 13.41 rank 5
27 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
96.72 93.98 98.06 95.73 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
28 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.68 95.32 98.85 97.83 Strong Dem + 13.35 rank 5
29 Welch, Peter D
VT
96.67 96.67 98.50 98.50 Strong Dem + 13.34 rank 5
30 Gillibrand, Kirsten D
NY
96.62 92.78 98.32 97.19 Strong Dem + 13.29 rank 5
31 Grijalva, Raul1 D
AZ-7
96.58 99.08 98.09 98.77 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
32 Merkley, Jeff D
OR
96.58 95.56 97.89 97.17 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
33 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
96.55 96.55 97.36 96.79 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
34 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
96.26 96.26 96.43 96.43 Strong Dem + 12.93 rank 5
35 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.23 96.56 96.53 95.87 Strong Dem + 12.90 rank 5
36 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
95.99 95.99 95.87 95.87 Strong Dem + 12.66 rank 5
37 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
95.97 95.97 97.24 97.24 Strong Dem + 12.64 rank 5
38 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
95.95 95.95 96.14 96.14 Strong Dem + 12.62 rank 5
39 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.95 96.24 97.69 96.77 Strong Dem + 12.62 rank 5
40 Booker, Cory D
NJ
95.87 94.38 97.58 97.78 Strong Dem + 12.54 rank 5
41 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.83 95.68 97.06 97.47 Strong Dem + 12.50 rank 5
42 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.79 93.55 98.11 96.57 Strong Dem + 12.46 rank 5
43 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
95.78 95.68 96.43 95.56 Strong Dem + 12.45 rank 5
44 Lee, Barbara D
CA-12
95.77 98.26 97.69 98.78 Strong Dem + 12.44 rank 5
45 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.70 95.70 95.27 95.27 Strong Dem + 12.37 rank 5
46 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.70 95.13 97.15 95.05 Strong Dem + 12.37 rank 5
47 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
95.70 95.70 95.43 95.43 Strong Dem + 12.37 rank 5
48 Padilla, Alex D
CA
95.69 90.45 98.20 96.26 Strong Dem + 12.36 rank 5
49 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.67 95.94 97.43 96.19 Strong Dem + 12.34 rank 5
50 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
95.63 95.63 97.19 97.19 Strong Dem + 12.30 rank 5
51 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.55 95.70 97.34 95.86 Strong Dem + 12.22 rank 5
52 Baldwin, Tammy D
WI
95.49 96.11 95.51 98.29 Swing + 18.82 rank 5
53 Brown, Sherrod D
OH
95.49 92.74 96.42 95.91 Strong Rep + 25.49 rank 5
54 Schatz, Brian D
HI
95.48 93.89 96.56 97.62 Strong Dem + 12.15 rank 5
55 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.35 98.56 97.87 97.75 Strong Dem + 12.02 rank 5
56 Bonamici, Suzanne1 D
OR-1
95.29 99.69 97.59 98.24 Strong Dem + 11.96 rank 5
57 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.19 96.52 96.80 97.01 Strong Dem + 11.86 rank 5
58 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.16 95.40 97.19 95.73 Strong Dem + 11.83 rank 5
59 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
95.10 96.28 97.09 95.72 Strong Dem + 11.77 rank 5
60 Van Hollen, Chris D
MD
95.04 100.00 95.40 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.71 rank 5
61 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
95.03 94.27 95.99 94.81 Leans Dem + 15.03 rank 5
62 Lujan, Ben D
NM
94.94 93.33 97.82 97.44 Leans Dem + 14.94 rank 5
63 Warnock, Raphael D
GA
94.85 93.10 97.32 97.37 Swing + 18.18 rank 5
64 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
94.84 94.84 96.08 96.08 Strong Dem + 11.51 rank 5
65 Durbin, Dick D
IL
94.83 95.48 94.98 98.19 Strong Dem + 11.50 rank 5
66 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
94.77 94.77 93.72 93.72 Strong Dem + 11.44 rank 5
67 Smith, Tina D
MN
94.73 93.89 95.40 97.62 Leans Dem + 14.73 rank 5
68 Reed, Jack D
RI
94.70 94.44 95.51 97.87 Strong Dem + 11.37 rank 5
69 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.65 95.11 96.78 95.80 Strong Dem + 11.32 rank 5
70 Blumenthal, Richard D
CT
94.63 94.44 96.42 97.86 Strong Dem + 11.30 rank 5
71 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
94.37 95.66 97.12 96.06 Strong Dem + 11.04 rank 5
72 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.25 95.13 97.58 96.26 Strong Dem + 10.92 rank 5
73 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
94.23 94.83 95.35 94.73 Strong Dem + 10.90 rank 5
74 Heinrich, Martin D
NM
94.06 94.44 94.89 97.64 Leans Dem + 14.06 rank 5
75 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.99 96.23 97.20 96.69 Strong Dem + 10.66 rank 5
76 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.82 94.56 96.91 94.80 Strong Dem + 10.49 rank 5
77 Bush, Cori1 D
MO-1
93.81 91.75 96.41 95.63 Strong Dem + 10.48 rank 5
78 Ossoff, Jon D
GA
93.76 88.83 96.93 95.28 Swing + 17.09 rank 5
79 Sanders, Bernie I
VT
93.68 88.27 95.77 91.90 Strong Dem + 10.35 rank 5
80 Mullin, Kevin D
CA-15
93.68 93.68 94.69 94.69 Strong Dem + 10.35 rank 5
81 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.46 94.56 95.14 94.77 Strong Dem + 10.13 rank 5
82 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.44 95.65 96.19 96.12 Strong Dem + 10.11 rank 5
83 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
93.44 91.30 95.44 93.53 Strong Dem + 10.11 rank 5
84 Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
93.36 90.83 96.46 95.19 Strong Dem + 10.03 rank 5
85 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.30 93.68 95.17 94.40 Strong Dem + 9.97 rank 5
86 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.29 97.09 95.87 96.98 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
87 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.29 93.31 97.06 96.18 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
88 Butler, Laphonza1 D
CA
93.27 93.27 97.24 97.24 Strong Dem + 9.94 rank 5
89 Pelosi, Nancy2 D
CA-11
93.25 90.38 94.78 92.96 Strong Dem + 9.92 rank 5
90 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-31
93.11 95.38 95.94 95.95 Strong Dem + 9.78 rank 5
91 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
93.07 95.94 96.81 95.86 Strong Dem + 9.74 rank 5
92 Hickenlooper, John D
CO
92.82 88.83 96.79 95.23 Strong Dem + 9.49 rank 5
93 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.71 92.71 94.83 94.83 Strong Dem + 9.38 rank 5
94 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
92.57 88.99 94.77 92.04 Strong Dem + 9.24 rank 5
95 Whitehouse, Sheldon D
RI
92.56 94.97 94.45 98.03 Strong Dem + 9.23 rank 5
96 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
92.55 92.55 93.64 93.64 Strong Dem + 9.22 rank 5
97 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.40 96.85 96.65 96.22 Strong Dem + 9.07 rank 5
98 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.28 94.81 94.72 94.87 Strong Dem + 8.95 rank 5
99 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
92.11 94.81 96.01 95.14 Leans Dem + 12.11 rank 5
100 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.00 93.97 96.39 94.67 Strong Dem + 8.67 rank 5
101 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
91.96 93.90 96.66 95.37 Strong Dem + 8.63 rank 5
102 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
91.95 91.95 93.59 93.59 Strong Dem + 8.62 rank 5
103 Cardin, Ben D
MD
91.84 94.44 94.38 97.64 Strong Dem + 8.51 rank 5
104 Schumer, Chuck D
NY
91.76 86.67 94.71 94.87 Strong Dem + 8.43 rank 5
105 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.75 97.99 95.25 96.81 Strong Dem + 8.42 rank 5
106 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
91.62 95.97 96.74 95.67 Strong Dem + 8.29 rank 5
107 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.40 95.10 96.29 94.94 Strong Dem + 8.07 rank 5
108 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.18 90.43 94.23 92.99 Strong Dem + 7.85 rank 5
109 Duckworth, Tammy D
IL
91.14 92.78 92.84 97.22 Strong Dem + 7.81 rank 5
110 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
91.06 94.83 95.88 95.62 Strong Dem + 7.73 rank 5
111 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.94 89.11 95.77 93.05 Leans Dem + 10.94 rank 5
112 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
90.83 95.11 96.26 96.18 Strong Dem + 7.50 rank 5
113 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.66 89.86 95.89 92.70 Strong Dem + 7.33 rank 5
114 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
90.51 91.62 96.01 93.87 Strong Dem + 7.18 rank 5
115 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
90.43 93.33 94.40 95.41 Strong Dem + 7.10 rank 5
116 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.38 92.17 96.08 94.60 Strong Dem + 7.05 rank 5
117 Kelly, Mark D
AZ
90.37 91.11 94.65 95.81 Swing + 13.70 rank 5
118 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
90.27 96.25 95.74 95.75 Strong Dem + 6.94 rank 5
119 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
90.26 90.26 92.35 92.35 Leans Dem + 10.26 rank 5
120 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
90.21 96.28 95.26 95.98 Strong Dem + 6.88 rank 5
121 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
90.17 92.53 95.74 94.30 Strong Dem + 6.84 rank 5
122 Cortez Masto, Catherine D
NV
90.16 94.29 91.76 97.84 Swing + 13.49 rank 5
123 Fetterman, John1 D
PA
89.94 89.94 95.19 95.19 Swing + 13.27 rank 5
124 Castro, Joaquin1 D
TX-20
89.89 96.11 95.88 96.86 Strong Dem + 6.56 rank 5
125 Kildee, Dan1 D
MI-8
89.69 87.54 95.86 92.15 Swing + 13.02 rank 5
126 Cantwell, Maria D
WA
89.66 97.22 93.47 98.93 Strong Dem + 6.33 rank 5
127 Murray, Patty D
WA
89.63 96.67 93.02 98.70 Strong Dem + 6.30 rank 5
128 Wyden, Ron D
OR
89.28 95.56 93.01 98.28 Strong Dem + 5.95 rank 5
129 Stabenow, Debbie Ann D
MI
89.18 92.22 93.38 96.96 Swing + 12.51 rank 5
130 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
89.08 88.24 95.41 92.59 Strong Dem + 5.75 rank 5
131 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.98 97.12 93.23 97.36 Strong Dem + 5.65 rank 5
132 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.64 93.98 95.85 95.30 Strong Dem + 5.31 rank 5
133 Peters, Gary D
MI
88.62 90.56 91.07 96.15 Swing + 11.95 rank 5
134 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
88.56 93.68 93.69 94.45 Strong Dem + 5.23 rank 5
135 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
88.49 92.84 93.71 94.17 Strong Dem + 5.16 rank 5
136 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
88.43 96.26 95.15 96.09 Strong Dem + 5.10 rank 5
137 Porter, Katie D
CA-47
88.37 90.21 94.94 94.01 Swing + 11.70 rank 5
138 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
88.28 91.12 94.59 93.17 Strong Dem + 4.95 rank 5
139 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
88.24 92.15 92.93 94.40 Strong Dem + 4.91 rank 5
140 Klobuchar, Amy D
MN
88.14 91.11 92.73 96.33 Leans Dem + 8.14 rank 5
141 Carson, André D
IN-7
88.00 93.95 95.28 95.60 Strong Dem + 4.67 rank 5
142 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
87.96 92.26 95.03 93.86 Strong Dem + 4.63 rank 5
143 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
87.93 92.01 94.69 94.33 Strong Dem + 4.60 rank 5
144 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-16
87.66 93.39 93.22 94.43 Strong Dem + 4.33 rank 5
145 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.65 92.22 94.46 93.91 Strong Dem + 4.32 rank 5
146 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.60 88.73 95.01 91.88 Strong Dem + 4.27 rank 5
147 Murphy, Chris D
CT
87.52 97.22 91.11 98.72 Strong Dem + 4.19 rank 5
148 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
87.42 96.84 94.95 96.40 Strong Dem + 4.09 rank 5
149 Casey, Bob1 D
PA
87.41 89.71 91.86 96.05 Swing + 10.74 rank 5
150 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
87.36 87.36 92.16 92.16 Strong Dem + 4.03 rank 5
151 McBath, Lucy D
GA-7
87.33 91.91 94.13 93.56 Strong Dem + 4.00 rank 5
152 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
87.20 95.98 93.24 95.60 Strong Dem + 3.87 rank 5
153 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
87.13 86.71 94.18 91.28 Strong Dem + 3.80 rank 5
154 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
87.03 87.03 92.14 92.14 Strong Dem + 3.70 rank 5
155 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
87.03 92.77 94.82 93.71 Strong Dem + 3.70 rank 5
156 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.93 97.42 92.88 96.82 Strong Dem + 3.60 rank 5
157 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
86.86 89.16 94.53 92.41 Strong Dem + 3.53 rank 5
158 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.84 91.69 94.91 93.62 Strong Dem + 3.51 rank 5
159 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
86.80 85.10 94.26 90.82 Swing + 10.13 rank 5
160 Larson, John D
CT-1
86.56 90.70 93.37 93.72 Strong Dem + 3.23 rank 5
161 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
86.48 76.31 95.05 86.92 Strong Dem + 3.15 rank 5
162 Rosen, Jacky D
NV
86.15 90.00 90.69 94.23 Swing + 9.48 rank 5
163 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
86.02 90.17 94.32 92.94 Strong Dem + 2.69 rank 5
164 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.99 88.15 94.68 92.07 Strong Dem + 2.66 rank 5
165 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
85.47 90.54 93.90 93.05 Strong Dem + 2.14 rank 5
166 Pettersen, Brittany D
CO-7
85.34 85.34 91.02 91.02 Strong Dem + 2.01 rank 5
167 Schiff, Adam D
CA-30
85.27 91.79 93.36 93.87 Strong Dem + 1.94 rank 5
168 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
85.12 84.15 93.94 89.83 Leans Dem + 5.12 rank 5
169 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
85.06 93.98 92.70 94.87 Strong Dem + 1.73 rank 5
170 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
84.88 81.32 91.55 89.05 Leans Dem + 4.88 rank 5
171 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
84.77 84.77 90.83 90.83 Swing + 8.10 rank 5
172 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
84.71 85.71 93.87 91.50 Strong Dem + 1.38 rank 5
173 Kaine, Tim D
VA
84.59 93.89 89.64 97.23 Leans Dem + 4.59 rank 5
174 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-3
84.54 73.02 94.18 83.49 Strong Dem + 1.21 rank 5
175 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
84.43 85.29 94.10 90.52 Strong Dem + 1.10 rank 5
176 Coons, Chris D
DE
84.43 94.38 90.34 97.81 Strong Dem + 1.10 rank 5
177 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
84.28 89.97 93.70 93.10 Strong Dem + 0.95 rank 5
178 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
84.25 86.21 91.60 89.03 Strong Dem + 0.92 rank 5
179 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.17 89.11 93.88 92.33 Strong Dem + 0.84 rank 5
180 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
84.03 91.12 92.45 93.29 Strong Dem + 0.70 rank 5
181 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
84.00 90.17 92.38 92.19 Strong Dem + 0.67 rank 5
182 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
83.95 92.82 91.56 93.94 Strong Dem + 0.62 rank 5
183 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
83.93 83.09 93.86 88.88 Leans Rep + 10.60 rank 5
184 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.86 94.24 91.76 95.35 Strong Dem + 0.53 rank 5
185 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
83.76 95.11 91.73 95.50 Strong Dem + 0.43 rank 5
186 Trone, David D
MD-6
83.73 82.60 93.08 89.62 Leans Dem + 3.73 rank 5
187 Jackson, Jeff D
NC-14
83.57 83.57 89.88 89.88 Strong Dem + 0.24 rank 5
188 Garamendi, John1 D
CA-8
83.56 93.51 93.10 93.42 Strong Dem + 0.23 rank 5
189 Kennedy, Tim D
NY-26
83.53 83.53 91.71 91.71 Strong Dem + 0.20 rank 5
190 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
83.44 93.70 93.97 94.70 Strong Dem + 0.11 rank 5
191 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
83.36 83.09 91.71 87.09 Strong Dem + 0.03 rank 5
192 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
83.28 80.00 92.58 87.51 Leans Dem + 3.28 rank 5
193 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.18 86.99 94.04 91.54 Leans Dem + 3.18 rank 5
194 Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
83.13 78.45 90.45 87.23 Strong Dem - 0.20 rank 5
195 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
83.01 88.79 93.45 91.81 Strong Dem - 0.32 rank 5
196 Bennet, Michael D
CO
82.91 90.56 89.61 96.16 Strong Dem - 0.42 rank 5
197 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
82.79 83.38 92.52 89.41 Swing + 6.12 rank 5
198 Green, Al D
TX-9
82.59 94.81 93.40 95.58 Strong Dem - 0.74 rank 5
199 Hassan, Maggie D
NH
82.49 91.11 87.44 96.14 Leans Dem + 2.49 rank 5
200 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
82.37 84.16 93.62 90.14 Strong Dem - 0.96 rank 5
201 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
82.18 82.47 92.64 89.70 Leans Dem + 2.18 rank 5
202 Shaheen, Jeanne D
NH
82.11 90.50 89.69 96.01 Leans Dem + 2.11 rank 5
203 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
82.02 83.91 92.08 89.25 Strong Dem - 1.31 rank 5
204 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
81.36 88.25 92.56 89.86 Strong Dem - 1.97 rank 5
205 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
81.27 81.95 92.52 88.69 Strong Dem - 2.06 rank 5
206TIE Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.09 81.09 88.35 88.35 Strong Dem - 2.24 rank 5
206TIE Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
81.09 81.09 88.51 88.51 Leans Dem + 1.09 rank 5
208 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
80.62 87.97 91.80 91.63 Strong Dem - 2.71 rank 5
209 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
80.43 88.51 93.03 92.30 Strong Dem - 2.90 rank 5
210 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
80.42 80.42 89.37 89.37 Strong Dem - 2.91 rank 5
211 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
80.41 93.97 92.87 94.43 Strong Dem - 2.92 rank 5
212 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
80.27 80.12 91.33 87.22 Swing + 3.60 rank 5
213 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.97 86.25 93.17 91.25 Leans Dem - 0.03 rank 5
214 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
79.94 79.94 86.67 86.67 Leans Dem - 0.06 rank 5
215 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
79.64 78.80 90.97 85.99 Swing + 2.97 rank 5
216 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
79.58 90.12 89.84 92.49 Strong Dem - 3.75 rank 5
217 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
79.46 82.13 91.19 88.74 Strong Dem - 3.87 rank 5
218 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
79.29 93.41 92.38 94.72 Strong Dem - 4.04 rank 5
219 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
78.78 76.22 90.12 84.00 Leans Dem - 1.22 rank 5
220 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
78.76 91.62 90.95 93.76 Strong Dem - 4.57 rank 5
221 Tester, Jon D
MT
78.71 87.78 86.84 92.90 Strong Rep + 8.71 rank 5
222 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
78.60 75.93 90.75 85.65 Swing + 1.93 rank 5
223 Warner, Mark D
VA
78.35 91.62 87.47 96.30 Leans Dem - 1.65 rank 5
224 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
78.30 77.65 87.11 86.30 Swing + 1.63 rank 5
225 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
78.16 91.86 92.18 93.74 Strong Dem - 5.17 rank 5
226 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
77.91 77.91 86.13 86.13 Leans Dem - 2.09 rank 5
227 King, Angus I
ME
77.81 89.44 85.72 95.02 Leans Dem - 2.19 rank 5
228 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
77.69 79.94 88.73 87.53 Leans Rep + 4.36 rank 5
229 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
77.65 87.13 92.00 91.28 Leans Dem - 2.35 rank 5
230 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
77.36 76.97 89.91 84.59 Leans Dem - 2.64 rank 5
231 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
77.29 92.84 91.45 94.30 Strong Dem - 6.04 rank 5
232 González, Vicente D
TX-34
77.26 79.25 87.72 81.23 Strong Dem - 6.07 rank 5
233 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
77.09 87.93 90.69 91.95 Strong Dem - 6.24 rank 5
234 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
76.89 68.31 90.49 81.00 Strong Dem - 6.44 rank 5
235 Sinema, Kyrsten I
AZ
76.85 79.66 80.76 88.67 Swing + 0.18 rank 5
236 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
76.77 94.25 88.38 95.14 Strong Dem - 6.56 rank 5
237 Nickel III, Wiley D
NC-13
76.66 76.66 85.70 85.70 Swing - 0.01 rank 5
238 Case, Ed D
HI-1
76.35 86.25 86.45 90.55 Strong Dem - 6.98 rank 5
239 Carper, Tom D
DE
76.02 93.85 85.38 97.42 Strong Dem - 7.31 rank 5
240 Caraveo, Yadira D
CO-8
75.87 75.87 82.94 82.94 Swing - 0.80 rank 5
241 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
75.83 89.31 90.58 92.32 Strong Dem - 7.50 rank 5
242 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-7
75.45 79.08 88.97 87.41 Swing - 1.22 rank 5
243 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
75.43 75.43 84.73 84.73 Swing - 1.24 rank 5
244 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
75.15 77.23 87.63 81.95 Leans Dem - 4.85 rank 5
245 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
74.96 74.81 90.51 83.15 Swing - 1.71 rank 5
246 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
74.92 93.10 90.46 94.08 Strong Dem - 8.41 rank 5
247 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
74.05 86.17 88.98 90.94 Strong Dem - 9.28 rank 5
248 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
74.04 79.94 88.61 87.59 Leans Dem - 5.96 rank 5
249 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
73.28 90.80 90.05 93.14 Strong Dem - 10.05 rank 5
250 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
72.91 72.91 83.62 83.62 Leans Dem - 7.09 rank 5
251 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.85 86.78 88.95 90.12 Strong Dem - 10.48 rank 5
252 Peltola, Mary5 D
AK-AL
71.97 70.90 75.13 73.28 Leans Rep - 1.36 rank 5
253 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
71.90 89.63 89.00 92.55 Strong Dem - 11.43 rank 5
254 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
70.77 70.77 70.60 70.60 Leans Rep - 2.56 rank 5
255 Davis, Don D
NC-1
69.83 69.83 75.15 75.15 Leans Dem - 10.17 rank 5
256 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
69.59 87.39 87.27 91.48 Strong Dem - 13.74 rank 5
257 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
67.48 75.50 84.79 84.94 Leans Dem - 12.52 rank 5
258 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
65.77 70.03 78.11 68.25 Leans Rep - 7.56 rank 5
259 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
63.41 89.94 80.93 92.07 Leans Dem - 16.59 rank 5
260 Manchin, Joe D
WV
61.29 54.91 69.97 76.31 Strong Rep - 8.71 rank 5
261 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
54.14 78.20 76.74 84.63 Strong Dem - 29.19 rank 5
262 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.87 71.35 75.61 75.48 Leans Dem - 30.13 rank 5
263 Collins, Susan R
ME
25.65 26.67 40.60 63.19 Leans Dem - 54.35 rank 5
264 Fitzpatrick, Brian R
PA-1
23.14 26.07 35.57 40.16 Swing - 53.53 rank 5
265 Massie, Thomas R
KY-4
19.68 10.79 12.36 8.43 Strong Rep - 50.32 rank 5
266 Smith, Chris R
NJ-4
14.40 3.44 20.47 14.73 Strong Rep - 55.60 rank 5
267 Murkowski, Lisa R
AK
12.20 24.02 30.24 59.96 Leans Rep - 61.13 rank 5
268 Griffith, Morgan R
VA-9
11.25 4.03 7.24 6.59 Strong Rep - 58.75 rank 5
269 McClintock, Tom R
CA-5
10.39 4.89 5.37 5.58 Strong Rep - 59.61 rank 5
270 Chavez-DeRemer, Lori R
OR-5
10.34 10.34 27.56 27.56 Leans Dem - 69.66 rank 5
271 Paul, Rand1 R
KY
10.01 7.26 9.11 7.47 Strong Rep - 59.99 rank 5
272 Biggs, Andy R
AZ-5
9.49 8.88 5.62 6.24 Strong Rep - 60.51 rank 5
273 Gaetz, Matt R
FL-1
8.16 8.82 7.81 7.20 Strong Rep - 61.84 rank 5
274 Mace, Nancy R
SC-1
7.22 8.05 13.92 15.64 Strong Rep - 62.78 rank 5
275 Posey, Bill R
FL-8
7.09 2.87 5.70 3.35 Strong Rep - 62.91 rank 5
276 Stefanik, Elise R
NY-21
6.95 0.58 12.58 4.97 Strong Rep - 63.05 rank 5
277 Schweikert, Dave R
AZ-1
6.81 2.58 4.99 6.41 Swing - 69.86 rank 5
278 Graham, Lindsey R
SC
6.64 12.36 17.70 42.57 Strong Rep - 63.36 rank 5
279 Perry, Scott R
PA-10
6.64 2.88 3.76 3.24 Leans Rep - 66.69 rank 5
280 Gosar, Paul R
AZ-9
6.59 4.07 4.57 4.02 Strong Rep - 63.41 rank 5
281 Crane, Eli R
AZ-2
6.30 6.30 5.20 5.20 Leans Rep - 67.03 rank 5
282 Diaz-Balart, Mario R
FL-26
6.04 0.00 11.87 16.61 Strong Rep - 63.96 rank 5
283 Rosendale, Matt R
MT-2
6.00 8.02 5.24 6.01 Strong Rep - 64.00 rank 5
284 Lee, Mike R
UT
5.69 5.06 6.41 5.59 Strong Rep - 64.31 rank 5
285 Roy, Chip R
TX-21
5.68 4.03 5.66 4.05 Strong Rep - 64.32 rank 5
286 Harris, Andy R
MD-1
5.66 2.87 3.98 3.19 Strong Rep - 64.34 rank 5
287 Davidson, Warren R
OH-8
5.64 2.30 4.13 3.56 Strong Rep - 64.36 rank 5
288 Buchanan, Vern R
FL-16
5.61 0.58 8.54 7.89 Strong Rep - 64.39 rank 5
289 Burchett, Tim R
TN-2
5.35 6.59 4.26 4.95 Strong Rep - 64.65 rank 5
290 Lawler, Mike R
NY-17
4.91 4.91 26.25 26.25 Swing - 71.76 rank 5
291 Joyce, David R
OH-14
4.91 2.61 12.47 20.85 Strong Rep - 65.09 rank 5
292 Greene, Marjorie R
GA-14
4.66 4.91 4.76 4.72 Strong Rep - 65.34 rank 5
293 Mooney, Alex R
WV-2
4.65 1.77 3.54 1.72 Strong Rep - 65.35 rank 5
294 Jordan, Jim R
OH-4
4.62 2.88 2.35 1.90 Strong Rep - 65.38 rank 5
295 Van Drew, Jeff R
NJ-2
4.61 0.86 26.10 3.91 Leans Rep - 68.72 rank 5
296 Kean Jr., Tom R
NJ-7
4.60 4.60 25.27 25.27 Swing - 72.07 rank 5
297 Mast, Brian R
FL-21
4.53 2.02 7.54 3.95 Strong Rep - 65.47 rank 5
298 Bishop, Dan R
NC-8
4.52 3.79 3.39 4.05 Strong Rep - 65.48 rank 5
299 Duncan, Jeff R
SC-3
4.37 2.59 2.70 1.78 Strong Rep - 65.63 rank 5
300TIE Boebert, Lauren R
CO-3
4.33 4.36 4.51 4.04 Leans Rep - 69.00 rank 5
300TIE Good, Bob R
VA-5
4.33 5.20 4.06 4.29 Strong Rep - 65.67 rank 5
302 Zinke, Ryan R
MT-1
4.18 2.01 5.71 5.36 Leans Rep - 69.15 rank 5
303 Grassley, Chuck R
IA
4.17 1.11 9.35 15.57 Strong Rep - 65.83 rank 5
304 Burgess, Mike R
TX-26
4.13 1.15 4.01 4.38 Strong Rep - 65.87 rank 5
305 Luna, Anna R
FL-13
4.12 4.12 4.08 4.08 Leans Rep - 69.21 rank 5
306 Turner, Mike R
OH-10
4.10 4.36 11.81 19.52 Leans Rep - 69.23 rank 5
307 Comer, James R
KY-1
4.02 3.16 2.58 2.26 Strong Rep - 65.98 rank 5
308 Cloud, Michael R
TX-27
3.88 3.16 2.97 2.84 Strong Rep - 66.12 rank 5
309 Romney, Mitt R
UT
3.76 1.13 19.23 22.07 Strong Rep - 66.24 rank 5
310 Brecheen, Josh R
OK-2
3.76 3.76 3.20 3.20 Strong Rep - 66.24 rank 5
311 Nunn, Zachary R
IA-3
3.74 3.74 17.19 17.19 Swing - 72.93 rank 5
312 Thompson, Glenn R
PA-15
3.71 1.44 9.01 14.42 Strong Rep - 66.29 rank 5
313 Norman, Ralph R
SC-5
3.64 3.17 2.34 3.35 Strong Rep - 66.36 rank 5
314 Grothman, Glenn R
WI-6
3.62 0.86 2.87 1.78 Strong Rep - 66.38 rank 5
315 Simpson, Mike R
ID-2
3.60 1.15 10.01 19.74 Strong Rep - 66.40 rank 5
316 Burlison, Eric R
MO-7
3.46 3.46 2.87 2.87 Strong Rep - 66.54 rank 5
317 Collins, Mike R
GA-10
3.45 3.45 2.72 2.72 Strong Rep - 66.55 rank 5
318 Valadao, David R
CA-22
3.34 0.58 10.90 20.83 Swing - 73.33 rank 5
319 Graves, Garret R
LA-6
3.29 1.44 5.50 8.55 Strong Rep - 66.71 rank 5
320 Bacon, Don R
NE-2
3.28 2.29 13.29 21.58 Swing - 73.39 rank 5
321 Wittman, Rob R
VA-1
3.25 0.29 4.70 4.26 Leans Rep - 70.08 rank 5
322 Huizenga, Bill R
MI-4
3.19 0.29 3.27 4.75 Leans Rep - 70.14 rank 5
323 Emmer, Tom R
MN-6
3.18 1.72 4.51 2.47 Strong Rep - 66.82 rank 5
324 Hageman, Harriet R
WY-AL
3.17 3.17 2.73 2.73 Strong Rep - 66.83 rank 5
325TIE Duarte, John R
CA-13
3.16 3.16 11.85 11.85 Swing - 73.51 rank 5
325TIE Molinaro, Marc R
NY-19
3.16 3.16 19.81 19.81 Swing - 73.51 rank 5
327 Fry, Russell R
SC-7
3.15 3.15 4.14 4.14 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
328 Bilirakis, Gus R
FL-12
3.10 2.88 5.57 4.01 Strong Rep - 66.90 rank 5
329 Rogers, Mike R
AL-3
3.03 0.86 6.73 8.16 Strong Rep - 66.97 rank 5
330 Daines, Steve R
MT
2.89 5.00 4.51 5.74 Strong Rep - 67.11 rank 5
331 Ogles IV, Andy R
TN-5
2.89 2.89 2.76 2.76 Strong Rep - 67.11 rank 5
332 Newhouse, Dan R
WA-4
2.88 0.86 9.24 16.24 Strong Rep - 67.12 rank 5
333 Bost, Mike R
IL-12
2.88 1.15 6.46 2.48 Strong Rep - 67.12 rank 5
334 Cole, Tom R
OK-4
2.87 0.58 8.52 18.17 Strong Rep - 67.13 rank 5
335 Schmitt, Stephen R
MO
2.87 2.87 3.76 3.76 Strong Rep - 67.13 rank 5
336 Bean, Aaron R
FL-4
2.87 2.87 2.12 2.12 Strong Rep - 67.13 rank 5
337 Higgins, Clay R
LA-3
2.85 2.29 2.41 2.48 Strong Rep - 67.15 rank 5
338 Cruz, Ted R
TX
2.83 3.91 2.51 2.55 Strong Rep - 67.17 rank 5
339 Cline, Ben R
VA-6
2.82 2.58 2.33 2.36 Strong Rep - 67.18 rank 5
340 Webster, Dan R
FL-11
2.78 1.44 3.79 3.61 Strong Rep - 67.22 rank 5
341 Spartz, Victoria R
IN-5
2.76 3.18 4.29 4.15 Strong Rep - 67.24 rank 5
342 Kennedy, John R
LA
2.75 3.35 7.01 14.47 Strong Rep - 67.25 rank 5
343 Sullivan, Dan R
AK
2.74 3.93 6.48 7.74 Leans Rep - 70.59 rank 5
344 Moran, Jerry R
KS
2.74 0.56 9.00 15.23 Strong Rep - 67.26 rank 5
345 DesJarlais, Scott R
TN-4
2.73 1.46 2.65 2.66 Strong Rep - 67.27 rank 5
346 Steube, Greg R
FL-17
2.72 2.65 2.68 2.80 Strong Rep - 67.28 rank 5
347 Lummis, Cynthia R
WY
2.72 4.47 4.46 5.38 Strong Rep - 67.28 rank 5
348 Tiffany, Tom R
WI-7
2.68 2.87 2.47 2.49 Strong Rep - 67.32 rank 5
349 Hawley, Josh R
MO
2.64 7.26 2.94 6.11 Strong Rep - 67.36 rank 5
350 Foxx, Virginia R
NC-5
2.57 1.15 2.53 2.49 Strong Rep - 67.43 rank 5
351 Rogers, Hal R
KY-5
2.53 0.29 7.91 16.67 Strong Rep - 67.47 rank 5
352 Aderholt, Robert R
AL-4
2.52 0.57 6.02 6.90 Strong Rep - 67.48 rank 5
353 Loudermilk, Barry R
GA-11
2.49 1.45 1.54 1.58 Strong Rep - 67.51 rank 5
354 Amodei, Mark R
NV-2
2.45 0.00 6.38 10.11 Strong Rep - 67.55 rank 5
355 Bergman, Jack R
MI-1
2.43 0.57 5.54 6.62 Strong Rep - 67.57 rank 5
356 Graves, Sam R
MO-6
2.42 1.15 3.95 5.46 Strong Rep - 67.58 rank 5
357 Nehls, Troy R
TX-22
2.42 2.88 2.32 2.69 Strong Rep - 67.58 rank 5
358 Weber, Randy R
TX-14
2.41 1.72 1.76 1.31 Strong Rep - 67.59 rank 5
359TIE Hunt, Wesley R
TX-38
2.41 2.41 3.05 3.05 Strong Rep - 67.59 rank 5
359TIE Maloy, Celeste R
UT-2
2.41 2.41 6.73 6.73 Strong Rep - 67.59 rank 5
361 Stauber, Pete R
MN-8
2.40 1.17 9.61 4.95 Strong Rep - 67.60 rank 5
362 Miller, Max R
OH-7
2.32 2.32 9.31 9.31 Strong Rep - 67.68 rank 5
363 LaLota, Nick R
NY-1
2.30 2.30 19.88 19.88 Leans Rep - 71.03 rank 5
364 Curtis, John R
UT-3
2.26 2.31 5.75 10.00 Strong Rep - 67.74 rank 5
365 Donalds, Byron R
FL-19
2.25 2.92 2.34 2.83 Strong Rep - 67.75 rank 5
366 Kim, Young R
CA-40
2.23 2.01 18.36 21.92 Strong Rep - 67.77 rank 5
367 Braun, Michael R
IN
2.23 5.03 2.60 5.17 Strong Rep - 67.77 rank 5
368 Finstad, Brad R
MN-1
2.21 2.30 2.21 2.01 Strong Rep - 67.79 rank 5
369 McMorris Rodgers, Cathy R
WA-5
2.21 0.29 4.04 3.02 Strong Rep - 67.79 rank 5
370 Garcia, Mike R
CA-27
2.16 1.72 11.11 13.07 Leans Dem - 77.84 rank 5
371 Hoeven, John R
ND
2.12 3.91 6.79 6.39 Strong Rep - 67.88 rank 5
372 Armstrong, Kelly R
ND-AL
2.09 1.15 6.49 7.74 Strong Rep - 67.91 rank 5
373 Steil, Bryan R
WI-1
2.08 0.29 6.32 5.57 Leans Rep - 71.25 rank 5
374 Malliotakis, Nicole R
NY-11
2.08 2.04 10.22 8.41 Strong Rep - 67.92 rank 5
375 Gooden, Lance R
TX-5
2.08 1.72 2.04 1.89 Strong Rep - 67.92 rank 5
376 Cammack, Kat R
FL-3
2.07 2.90 2.59 2.43 Strong Rep - 67.93 rank 5
377 Langworthy, Nick R
NY-23
2.03 2.03 6.50 6.50 Strong Rep - 67.97 rank 5
378 Issa, Darrell R
CA-48
2.02 2.88 3.91 7.58 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
379 Thune, John R
SD
2.02 0.00 4.88 5.53 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
380TIE Mills, Cory R
FL-7
2.01 2.01 3.08 3.08 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
380TIE Self, Keith R
TX-3
2.01 2.01 2.24 2.24 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
382 McCaul, Michael R
TX-10
2.01 0.58 5.14 11.26 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
383 Granger, Kay R
TX-12
1.98 0.00 5.37 10.22 Strong Rep - 68.02 rank 5
384 Hill, French R
AR-2
1.94 0.29 4.64 8.26 Strong Rep - 68.06 rank 5
385 LaMalfa, Doug R
CA-1
1.92 1.74 2.55 2.21 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
386 Salazar, Maria R
FL-27
1.92 1.76 16.67 17.57 Leans Rep - 71.41 rank 5
387 Lucas, Frank R
OK-3
1.91 0.00 5.89 16.46 Strong Rep - 68.09 rank 5
388TIE Gonzales, Tony R
TX-23
1.90 1.73 10.58 11.32 Leans Rep - 71.43 rank 5
388TIE Miller, Mary R
IL-15
1.90 2.58 2.53 2.36 Strong Rep - 68.10 rank 5
390 Moore, Barry R
AL-2
1.89 2.87 1.99 2.36 Strong Rep - 68.11 rank 5
391 Harshbarger, Diana R
TN-1
1.89 3.15 1.62 2.35 Strong Rep - 68.11 rank 5
392 Crawford, Rick R
AR-1
1.88 1.72 4.15 6.39 Strong Rep - 68.12 rank 5
393 Scott, Austin R
GA-8
1.87 0.57 2.96 9.07 Strong Rep - 68.13 rank 5
394 Palmer, Gary R
AL-6
1.85 1.16 1.19 1.31 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
395 Arrington , Jodey R
TX-19
1.83 1.72 1.95 3.02 Strong Rep - 68.17 rank 5
396 Tenney, Claudia R
NY-24
1.81 1.15 4.24 3.91 Strong Rep - 68.19 rank 5
397 Smith, Jason R
MO-8
1.78 0.86 1.73 2.86 Strong Rep - 68.22 rank 5
398 Carey, Mike R
OH-15
1.77 1.72 7.82 8.27 Leans Rep - 71.56 rank 5
399TIE Marshall, Roger R
KS
1.75 5.00 3.83 7.42 Strong Rep - 68.25 rank 5
399TIE Tuberville, Tommy R
AL
1.75 4.44 1.49 2.00 Strong Rep - 68.25 rank 5
401 Johnson, Mike4 R
LA-4
1.74 0.71 1.86 0.81 Strong Rep - 68.26 rank 5
402 Vance, J.D. R
OH
1.74 1.74 5.71 5.71 Strong Rep - 68.26 rank 5
403TIE James, John R
MI-10
1.73 1.73 18.04 18.04 Swing - 74.94 rank 5
403TIE Van Orden, Derrick R
WI-3
1.73 1.73 9.82 9.82 Leans Rep - 71.60 rank 5
405 Luttrell, Morgan R
TX-8
1.72 1.72 2.60 2.60 Strong Rep - 68.28 rank 5
406 Obernolte, Jay R
CA-23
1.72 0.86 14.26 17.10 Strong Rep - 68.28 rank 5
407 Banks, Jim R
IN-3
1.71 1.44 1.67 2.51 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
408 Hudson, Richard R
NC-9
1.68 0.29 3.12 5.31 Strong Rep - 68.32 rank 5
409 Lamborn, Doug R
CO-5
1.68 0.29 1.45 2.25 Strong Rep - 68.32 rank 5
410 Womack, Steve R
AR-3
1.67 0.57 6.89 17.18 Strong Rep - 68.33 rank 5
411 Wilson, Joe R
SC-2
1.65 0.29 2.35 3.70 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
412 Waltz, Michael R
FL-6
1.64 0.00 5.42 1.35 Strong Rep - 68.36 rank 5
413 Moolenaar, John R
MI-2
1.64 2.02 4.66 7.21 Strong Rep - 68.36 rank 5
414 Fulcher, Russ R
ID-1
1.63 1.15 1.72 1.76 Strong Rep - 68.37 rank 5
415 Kelly, Mike R
PA-16
1.62 0.00 6.16 11.18 Strong Rep - 68.38 rank 5
416 Capito, Shelley R
WV
1.60 0.00 13.84 15.30 Strong Rep - 68.40 rank 5
417 Smucker, Lloyd R
PA-11
1.59 0.86 4.17 4.72 Strong Rep - 68.41 rank 5
418 Wenstrup, Brad R
OH-2
1.57 0.00 2.64 4.37 Strong Rep - 68.43 rank 5
419 Garbarino, Andrew R
NY-2
1.55 1.15 18.47 21.63 Strong Rep - 68.45 rank 5
420 Clyde, Andrew R
GA-9
1.55 2.01 1.70 2.13 Strong Rep - 68.45 rank 5
421TIE Fischbach, Michelle R
MN-7
1.54 2.29 1.98 2.01 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
421TIE Mann, Tracey R
KS-1
1.54 2.01 2.40 3.18 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
423 Walberg, Timothy R
MI-5
1.53 0.00 2.85 5.94 Strong Rep - 68.47 rank 5
424 Scott, Rick R
FL
1.53 4.47 1.60 3.15 Strong Rep - 68.47 rank 5
425 Rounds, Mike R
SD
1.52 3.35 13.62 24.44 Strong Rep - 68.48 rank 5
426 McConnell, Mitch R
KY
1.51 0.00 6.53 15.16 Strong Rep - 68.49 rank 5
427 Cassidy, Bill R
LA
1.51 1.11 8.46 13.13 Strong Rep - 68.49 rank 5
428 Carter, John R
TX-31
1.49 0.00 4.34 8.40 Strong Rep - 68.51 rank 5
429 Scalise, Steve R
LA-1
1.49 0.30 1.73 1.75 Strong Rep - 68.51 rank 5
430 McHenry, Patrick R
NC-10
1.48 0.30 3.08 6.18 Strong Rep - 68.52 rank 5
431 Williams, Brandon R
NY-22
1.45 1.45 14.29 14.29 Swing - 75.22 rank 5
432 Kiggans, Jen R
VA-2
1.44 1.44 20.00 20.00 Swing - 75.23 rank 5
433 Calvert, Ken R
CA-41
1.43 0.00 7.00 17.20 Leans Rep - 71.90 rank 5
434 Rouzer, David R
NC-7
1.43 0.29 2.19 2.83 Strong Rep - 68.57 rank 5
435 Barr, Andy R
KY-6
1.41 0.00 3.27 4.65 Strong Rep - 68.59 rank 5
436 Crapo, Mike R
ID
1.41 0.56 4.25 4.25 Strong Rep - 68.59 rank 5
437 Yakym III, Rudy R
IN-2
1.40 1.43 3.76 3.65 Strong Rep - 68.60 rank 5
438 Cramer, Kevin R
ND
1.39 3.89 7.13 10.83 Strong Rep - 68.61 rank 5
439 Hagerty, Bill R
TN
1.38 2.33 3.21 2.80 Strong Rep - 68.62 rank 5
440TIE Fitzgerald, Scott R
WI-5
1.37 2.01 1.34 1.53 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
440TIE Moore, Blake R
UT-1
1.37 1.44 11.25 14.17 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
442 Owens, Burgess R
UT-4
1.37 2.01 6.22 7.66 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
443 Bucshon, Larry R
IN-8
1.37 0.86 5.94 16.75 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
444 Rubio, Marco R
FL
1.37 1.11 4.18 4.29 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
445 Green, Mark R
TN-7
1.36 1.47 1.53 1.50 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
446 Ferguson, Drew R
GA-3
1.34 1.45 2.72 5.42 Strong Rep - 68.66 rank 5
447 Meuser, Dan R
PA-9
1.34 1.44 4.32 5.29 Strong Rep - 68.66 rank 5
448 Wagner, Ann R
MO-2
1.34 0.29 6.07 14.95 Strong Rep - 68.66 rank 5
449 Johnson, Ron R
WI
1.34 4.44 2.72 2.19 Swing - 75.33 rank 5
450 LaHood, Darin R
IL-16
1.33 0.58 3.84 6.97 Strong Rep - 68.67 rank 5
451 Fleischmann, Chuck R
TN-3
1.31 2.01 5.03 15.80 Strong Rep - 68.69 rank 5
452 Westerman, Bruce R
AR-4
1.23 1.15 1.80 3.66 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
453TIE Miller-Meeks, Mariannette R
IA-1
1.20 1.15 11.22 12.26 Leans Rep - 72.13 rank 5
453TIE Steele, Michelle R
CA-45
1.20 0.86 10.13 12.26 Swing - 75.47 rank 5
455 Crenshaw, Dan R
TX-2
1.20 0.58 6.97 8.65 Strong Rep - 68.80 rank 5
456 Smith, Adrian R
NE-3
1.17 0.00 2.36 4.88 Strong Rep - 68.83 rank 5
457 Kiley, Kevin R
CA-3
1.15 1.15 21.18 21.18 Leans Rep - 72.18 rank 5
458 Babin, Brian R
TX-36
1.14 0.58 0.99 0.72 Strong Rep - 68.86 rank 5
459 Scott, Tim R
SC
1.13 3.45 2.47 1.99 Strong Rep - 68.87 rank 5
460 Carter, Buddy R
GA-1
1.13 0.57 2.32 4.36 Strong Rep - 68.87 rank 5
461 Mullin, Markwayne R
OK
1.13 1.13 4.19 4.19 Strong Rep - 68.87 rank 5
462 Young, Todd R
IN
1.12 0.00 12.05 18.61 Strong Rep - 68.88 rank 5
463 Williams, Roger R
TX-25
1.09 0.29 1.45 0.62 Strong Rep - 68.91 rank 5
464 Kelly, Trent R
MS-1
1.08 0.00 1.35 1.65 Strong Rep - 68.92 rank 5
465 Reschenthaler, Guy R
PA-14
1.04 1.15 5.19 2.59 Strong Rep - 68.96 rank 5
466 Fallon, Pat R
TX-4
1.03 1.44 1.07 1.20 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
467 Hern, Kevin R
OK-1
1.03 0.86 1.20 1.29 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
468 Guthrie, Brett R
KY-2
1.03 0.00 4.37 6.60 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
469 Lankford, James R
OK
1.02 1.11 2.38 4.08 Strong Rep - 68.98 rank 5
470 Wicker, Roger R
MS
1.02 0.00 8.41 9.21 Strong Rep - 68.98 rank 5
471 Rutherford, John R
FL-5
0.98 0.58 5.84 6.04 Strong Rep - 69.02 rank 5
472 Barrasso, John R
WY
0.97 2.82 2.45 2.04 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
473 Tillis, Thom R
NC
0.95 0.56 14.52 26.18 Leans Rep - 72.38 rank 5
474 Cornyn, John R
TX
0.94 0.00 6.20 9.76 Strong Rep - 69.06 rank 5
475 Boozman, John R
AR
0.94 0.00 3.86 4.97 Strong Rep - 69.06 rank 5
476 Sessions, Pete R
TX-17
0.94 0.00 1.75 3.68 Strong Rep - 69.06 rank 5
477 Luetkemeyer, Blaine R
MO-3
0.92 0.30 3.66 6.21 Strong Rep - 69.08 rank 5
478 Pence, Greg R
IN-6
0.90 0.00 5.64 9.00 Strong Rep - 69.10 rank 5
479 Timmons, William R
SC-4
0.90 1.15 1.47 1.65 Strong Rep - 69.10 rank 5
480 Miller, Carol R
WV-1
0.90 0.86 2.31 1.67 Strong Rep - 69.10 rank 5
481 Johnson, Dusty R
SD-AL
0.89 0.29 4.01 3.53 Strong Rep - 69.11 rank 5
482 Van Duyne, Beth R
TX-24
0.86 1.15 1.56 1.55 Strong Rep - 69.14 rank 5
483 Bentz, Cliff R
OR-2
0.86 1.15 4.52 5.78 Strong Rep - 69.14 rank 5
484 Blackburn, Marsha R
TN
0.84 1.73 1.49 1.11 Strong Rep - 69.16 rank 5
485 Ernst, Joni R
IA
0.84 0.00 4.43 5.45 Strong Rep - 69.16 rank 5
486 Latta, Bob R
OH-5
0.82 0.29 2.00 5.18 Strong Rep - 69.18 rank 5
487 Allen, Rick R
GA-12
0.82 0.86 0.98 2.25 Strong Rep - 69.18 rank 5
488 Rose, John R
TN-6
0.74 0.29 1.83 2.26 Strong Rep - 69.26 rank 5
489TIE Guest, Michael R
MS-3
0.74 0.57 3.12 3.67 Strong Rep - 69.26 rank 5
489TIE Joyce, John R
PA-13
0.74 1.15 2.05 2.35 Strong Rep - 69.26 rank 5
491 Baird, Jim R
IN-4
0.74 1.15 7.62 13.86 Strong Rep - 69.26 rank 5
492 Giménez, Carlos R
FL-28
0.69 0.00 11.27 11.53 Strong Rep - 69.31 rank 5
493 Feenstra, Randy R
IA-4
0.69 0.29 3.88 4.35 Strong Rep - 69.31 rank 5
494 Hinson, Ashley R
IA-2
0.69 0.00 12.07 14.67 Leans Rep - 72.64 rank 5
495 Murphy, Greg R
NC-3
0.66 0.60 4.28 5.69 Strong Rep - 69.34 rank 5
496 Risch, James R
ID
0.64 0.56 3.42 4.22 Strong Rep - 69.36 rank 5
497 D'Esposito, Anthony R
NY-4
0.58 0.58 20.49 20.49 Leans Dem - 79.42 rank 5
498 Alford, Mark R
MO-4
0.57 0.57 1.77 1.77 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
499TIE Ezell, Mike R
MS-4
0.57 0.57 2.67 2.67 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
499TIE Lee, Laurel R
FL-15
0.57 0.57 9.12 9.12 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
501 Lesko, Debbie R
AZ-8
0.56 0.29 1.63 1.39 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
502 Britt, Elizabeth R
AL
0.56 0.56 0.88 0.88 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
503 Carl, Jerry R
AL-1
0.51 0.57 2.47 2.36 Strong Rep - 69.49 rank 5
504 Flood, Mike R
NE-1
0.50 0.57 11.19 12.56 Strong Rep - 69.50 rank 5
505 Estes, Ron R
KS-4
0.50 0.29 1.23 1.53 Strong Rep - 69.50 rank 5
506 Kustoff, David R
TN-8
0.49 0.29 2.63 5.28 Strong Rep - 69.51 rank 5
507 Dunn, Neal R
FL-2
0.49 0.29 3.56 6.00 Strong Rep - 69.51 rank 5
508 Cotton, Tom R
AR
0.47 0.00 1.92 1.76 Strong Rep - 69.53 rank 5
509 Balderson, Troy R
OH-12
0.44 0.29 4.18 4.24 Strong Rep - 69.56 rank 5
510 Ellzey, Jake R
TX-6
0.42 0.29 8.55 11.10 Strong Rep - 69.58 rank 5
511TIE Fischer, Deb R
NE
0.35 0.00 3.19 1.50 Strong Rep - 69.65 rank 5
511TIE Jackson, Ronny R
TX-13
0.35 0.58 0.58 0.60 Strong Rep - 69.65 rank 5
513 Bice, Stephanie R
OK-5
0.34 0.29 7.97 10.38 Strong Rep - 69.66 rank 5
514 De la Cruz-Hernandez, Monica R
TX-15
0.29 0.29 4.49 4.49 Leans Rep - 73.04 rank 5
515 McCormick, Rich R
GA-6
0.29 0.29 3.22 3.22 Strong Rep - 69.71 rank 5
516TIE Edwards, Chuck R
NC-11
0.29 0.29 15.62 15.62 Strong Rep - 69.71 rank 5
516TIE Moran, Nathaniel R
TX-1
0.29 0.29 6.15 6.15 Strong Rep - 69.71 rank 5
516TIE Strong, Dale R
AL-5
0.29 0.29 2.48 2.48 Strong Rep - 69.71 rank 5
519 Hyde-Smith, Cindy R
MS
0.25 0.00 4.68 4.63 Strong Rep - 69.75 rank 5
520 Letlow, Julia R
LA-5
0.18 0.00 8.60 10.99 Strong Rep - 69.82 rank 5
521 LaTurner, Jake R
KS-2
0.17 0.29 6.56 9.55 Strong Rep - 69.83 rank 5
522TIE Budd, Ted R
NC
0.00 0.00 3.30 3.30 Leans Rep - 73.33 rank 5
522TIE Ciscomani, Juan R
AZ-6
0.00 0.00 19.62 19.62 Swing - 76.67 rank 5
522TIE Fong, Vince R
CA-20
0.00 0.00 14.71 14.71 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Franklin, Scott R
FL-18
0.00 0.00 0.92 1.06 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Houchin, Erin R
IN-9
0.00 0.00 1.18 1.18 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Lopez, Greg R
CO-4
0.00 0.00 2.44 2.44 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE McClain, Lisa R
MI-9
0.00 0.00 2.58 2.65 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Pfluger, August R
TX-11
0.00 0.00 1.50 2.36 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Ricketts, Pete R
NE
0.00 0.00 4.18 4.18 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
522TIE Rulli, Michael R
OH-6
0.00 0.00 9.09 9.09 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

4Mike Johnson's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

5Absences due to sudden death of husband not included in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)