What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2025-26 Lifetime 2025-26 Lifetime 2025-26
1TIE Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.46 100.00 98.70 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Bonamici, Suzanne 1 D
OR-1
95.77 100.00 97.68 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.48 100.00 96.37 99.27 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Dexter, Maxine D
OR-3
100.00 100.00 99.28 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Grijalva, Adelita D
AZ-7
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.40 99.64 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE McIver, LaMonica D
NJ-10
100.00 100.00 99.68 100.00 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
1TIE Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.91 100.00 97.20 100.00 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.73 99.44 98.97 99.64 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
96.86 99.44 97.56 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
93.86 99.44 97.00 99.64 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.69 99.44 97.75 99.27 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.20 99.44 98.97 98.92 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.69 99.44 98.20 99.27 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
9TIE Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
98.73 99.44 97.94 98.56 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
16TIE Clarke, Yvette 1 D
NY-9
97.02 99.44 98.36 99.26 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
16TIE DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.79 99.44 95.45 98.54 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
16TIE Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
96.22 99.44 97.61 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
16TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
96.45 99.44 98.32 99.64 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
16TIE Rivas, Luz D
CA-29
99.44 99.44 98.91 98.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
21TIE Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.70 99.44 93.41 99.27 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
21TIE Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.85 99.44 96.70 98.54 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
23 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
97.45 99.43 97.31 99.63 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.90 98.88 96.93 98.92 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Green, Al D
TX-9
83.61 98.88 93.57 98.18 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.78 98.88 96.33 98.19 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.45 98.88 98.17 98.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
98.91 98.88 99.04 98.90 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.46 98.88 93.02 98.55 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
24TIE Watson Coleman, Bonnie 1 D
NJ-12
97.24 98.88 98.68 99.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
31TIE Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.92 98.88 98.19 98.55 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
31TIE Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.75 98.88 97.65 98.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
31TIE Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.87 98.88 97.97 98.55 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
31TIE Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
92.46 98.88 96.30 98.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
35TIE McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.15 98.87 97.71 98.89 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
35TIE Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
95.15 98.87 97.29 98.18 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
35TIE Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.47 98.87 96.87 98.89 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
35TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.44 98.87 97.88 99.26 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
39 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
96.87 98.86 97.70 98.89 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
40TIE Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.81 98.32 96.52 98.19 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
40TIE McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
90.18 98.32 95.38 97.83 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
40TIE McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.93 98.32 96.48 98.19 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
40TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
96.13 98.32 97.31 98.55 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
40TIE Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.04 98.32 98.41 98.19 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
45 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
96.27 98.31 97.76 98.52 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
46TIE Ansari, Yassamin D
AZ-3
98.31 98.31 98.52 98.52 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
46TIE Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
96.81 98.31 98.10 98.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
48TIE Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
96.15 98.28 96.49 98.51 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
48TIE Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
94.30 98.28 97.24 97.74 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
48TIE Randall, Emily D
WA-6
98.28 98.28 98.88 98.88 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
51TIE Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
85.82 97.77 92.04 96.75 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
51TIE McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
96.44 97.77 95.95 97.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
51TIE Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
94.20 97.77 94.92 98.56 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
51TIE Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.45 97.77 97.84 98.17 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
55TIE Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
95.39 97.75 97.10 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
55TIE Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
89.37 97.75 95.96 97.79 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
80.28 97.74 92.50 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE Castro, Joaquin 1 D
TX-20
90.66 97.74 96.02 98.18 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.51 97.74 98.44 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
96.72 97.74 97.63 98.51 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.55 97.74 97.09 98.16 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
57TIE Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
89.34 97.74 95.28 97.82 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
63TIE Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.67 97.73 96.69 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
63TIE Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
86.18 97.73 94.70 97.66 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
63TIE Smith, Adam D
WA-9
76.50 97.73 88.87 97.44 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
66 Mullin, Kevin 1 D
CA-15
94.27 97.62 95.18 98.04 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
67TIE Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.73 97.21 98.13 97.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
67TIE Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
91.88 97.21 95.91 97.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
67TIE Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
94.07 97.21 96.93 97.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
70TIE Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
83.20 97.18 91.92 97.79 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
70TIE Friedman, Laura D
CA-30
97.18 97.18 97.82 97.82 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
70TIE Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.90 97.18 96.82 97.40 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
70TIE Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
89.20 97.18 95.27 97.81 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
70TIE Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
88.09 97.18 93.80 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
75 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
92.84 96.65 96.24 97.45 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
76TIE Carson, André D
IN-7
88.68 96.63 95.42 97.83 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
76TIE DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.99 96.63 93.80 97.09 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
76TIE Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.81 96.63 98.03 97.10 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
76TIE Liccardo, Sam D
CA-16
96.63 96.63 96.73 96.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
80TIE Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.03 96.61 97.18 96.69 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
80TIE Scott, David D
GA-13
72.95 96.61 89.11 96.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
80TIE Simon, Lateefah D
CA-12
96.61 96.61 97.45 97.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
83TIE Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
95.74 96.09 95.47 97.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
83TIE Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
87.46 96.09 94.63 97.07 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
83TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
88.71 96.09 94.65 96.75 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
83TIE Morrison, Kelly D
MN-3
96.09 96.09 96.38 96.38 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
83TIE Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
97.82 96.09 98.03 97.06 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
88 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.83 96.07 95.60 96.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
89TIE Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.80 96.05 95.46 96.72 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
89TIE Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
83.14 96.05 91.71 96.69 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
91 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
87.87 96.02 93.07 96.72 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
92 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.46 95.98 98.71 97.01 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
93 Pelosi, Nancy 1 2 D
CA-11
92.96 95.88 94.86 96.48 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
94TIE Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
92.04 95.53 93.15 95.67 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
94TIE Elfreth, Sarah D
MD-3
95.53 95.53 96.39 96.39 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
94TIE Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.60 95.53 95.37 96.03 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
94TIE Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.49 95.53 92.01 96.72 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
98 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.27 95.51 96.03 96.68 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
99TIE Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.94 95.48 95.92 96.67 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
99TIE DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
84.60 95.48 94.10 96.32 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
99TIE Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.86 95.48 96.09 96.35 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
102 Garamendi, John 1 D
CA-8
84.22 95.27 93.17 95.67 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
103TIE Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
87.49 94.97 94.86 96.70 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
103TIE Cisneros, Gil D
CA-31
85.19 94.97 95.37 96.03 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
103TIE Olszewski, Johnny D
MD-2
94.97 94.97 95.67 95.67 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
106TIE Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
81.88 94.94 93.02 96.01 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
106TIE Beyer, Don D
VA-8
91.26 94.94 96.25 95.99 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
106TIE Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
90.27 94.94 95.84 96.01 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
106TIE Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
85.92 94.94 93.34 95.94 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
106TIE Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.48 94.94 94.17 96.01 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
111 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.47 94.89 94.89 96.31 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
112 Walkinshaw, James D
VA-11
94.52 94.52 93.46 93.46 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
113 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
89.67 94.41 92.84 95.31 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
114TIE Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
94.17 94.35 95.39 95.97 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
114TIE Torres, Norma D
CA-35
87.44 94.35 94.83 95.24 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
116 Norcross, Donald 1 D
NJ-1
83.39 94.33 93.71 95.48 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
117 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
76.65 94.32 90.73 95.96 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
118TIE Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
94.90 94.29 96.09 95.52 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
118TIE Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.94 94.29 96.18 96.24 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
120 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
88.13 94.22 95.03 95.51 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
121 Pettersen, Brittany 1 D
CO-7
87.60 94.04 91.64 95.18 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
122TIE Foster, Bill D
IL-11
78.80 93.85 91.64 94.95 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
122TIE Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
93.05 93.85 94.85 95.24 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
122TIE Larson, John D
CT-1
85.89 93.85 93.45 94.85 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
122TIE Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.45 93.85 92.58 94.58 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
126 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.22 93.82 94.36 95.62 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
127TIE Keating, Bill D
MA-9
84.83 93.79 93.76 95.60 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
127TIE Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
78.30 93.79 91.09 94.85 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
129 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.72 93.75 93.38 95.19 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
130 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.45 93.71 97.70 95.49 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
131 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
83.95 93.57 93.49 95.42 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
132 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
86.30 93.30 93.94 94.58 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
133TIE Bell, Wesley D
MO-1
93.26 93.26 94.93 94.93 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
133TIE Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
78.56 93.26 89.94 94.14 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
133TIE McBride, Sarah D
DE-AL
93.26 93.26 95.29 95.29 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
136 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
89.42 93.18 92.84 94.70 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
137 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
94.77 93.14 97.01 94.80 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
138 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
90.40 92.94 95.70 94.59 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
139 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.02 92.86 96.84 94.47 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
140 Kennedy, Tim D
NY-26
90.31 92.74 93.50 94.58 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
141 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.53 92.70 93.87 94.51 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
142 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
86.39 92.66 94.34 94.40 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
143TIE Bera, Ami D
CA-6
74.83 92.09 90.19 93.41 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
143TIE Latimer, George D
NY-16
92.09 92.09 94.16 94.16 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
145 Case, Ed D
HI-1
76.48 91.57 86.97 92.39 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
146 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
86.43 91.48 94.62 93.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
147TIE Johnson, Julie D
TX-32
91.06 91.06 92.42 92.42 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
147TIE Pou, Nellie D
NJ-9
91.06 91.06 93.50 93.50 Swing rank 5 rank 5
149 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
77.85 91.01 90.75 92.70 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
150 Fields, Cleo D
LA-6
85.14 90.96 90.15 92.96 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
151TIE Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
84.29 90.50 90.41 93.12 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
151TIE Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
87.08 90.50 93.98 93.09 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
151TIE Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
91.93 90.50 94.62 93.45 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
154TIE Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
62.05 90.45 81.27 91.58 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
154TIE Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
88.24 90.45 94.38 92.75 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
156TIE Peters, Scott D
CA-50
71.23 89.94 87.45 91.64 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
156TIE Subramanyam, Suhas D
VA-10
89.94 89.94 92.78 92.78 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
158 Conaway, Herb D
NJ-3
89.89 89.89 93.07 93.07 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
159 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
76.80 89.39 90.70 92.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
160 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
81.80 89.27 92.44 90.81 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
161TIE Craig, Angie D
MN-2
76.82 88.83 88.04 91.67 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
161TIE Levin, Mike D
CA-49
86.56 88.83 93.89 91.70 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
163TIE Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
92.19 88.76 94.92 91.54 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
163TIE McClain-Delaney, April D
MD-6
88.76 88.76 90.91 90.91 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
165TIE Bynum, Janelle D
OR-5
88.27 88.27 90.97 90.97 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
165TIE Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
80.20 88.27 91.86 91.70 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
165TIE Min, Dave D
CA-47
88.27 88.27 90.22 90.22 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
168 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
75.40 88.20 89.12 91.27 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
169TIE Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
83.00 87.71 88.53 90.61 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
169TIE Figures, Shomari D
AL-2
87.71 87.71 90.51 90.51 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
169TIE Soto, Darren D
FL-9
84.88 87.71 93.63 90.97 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
172 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.65 87.57 91.56 89.82 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
173 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
83.75 86.78 91.94 87.92 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
174 Mannion, John D
NY-22
86.59 86.59 89.53 89.53 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
175 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
82.42 85.96 92.04 89.49 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
176 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.41 85.38 95.13 89.69 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
177 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
81.77 84.83 92.26 89.09 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
178 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.00 84.75 93.81 88.76 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
179TIE Harder, Josh D
CA-9
78.28 84.36 90.12 87.73 Swing rank 5 rank 5
179TIE Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
79.39 84.36 90.53 88.45 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
181 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
84.94 84.27 90.40 89.09 Swing rank 5 rank 5
182 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
83.29 84.09 90.75 88.19 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
183TIE Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.40 83.80 88.72 85.82 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
183TIE Tran, Derek D
CA-45
83.80 83.80 88.09 88.09 Swing rank 5 rank 5
185 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
81.52 83.71 88.03 88.04 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
186 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
82.17 83.52 91.91 88.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
187 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
94.11 83.43 96.73 88.35 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
188TIE McDonald Rivet, Kristen D
MI-8
83.24 83.24 84.48 84.48 Swing rank 5 rank 5
188TIE Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
80.39 83.24 91.83 87.73 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
188TIE Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
79.93 83.24 86.58 88.09 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
188TIE Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
80.65 83.24 86.19 85.92 Swing rank 5 rank 5
192 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
85.77 83.15 93.41 88.39 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
193 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.71 82.12 92.93 86.89 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
194TIE Goodlander, Maggie D
NH-2
81.56 81.56 87.00 87.00 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
194TIE Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
78.00 81.56 85.13 86.28 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5
194TIE Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
79.40 81.56 86.94 86.96 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
197 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
55.36 81.14 76.92 82.35 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
198 Whitesides, George D
CA-27
80.68 80.68 85.50 85.50 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
199TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
76.41 80.45 88.87 84.12 Swing rank 5 rank 5
199TIE Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
75.82 80.45 83.82 84.36 Swing rank 5 rank 5
201TIE Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
77.72 79.89 89.41 85.92 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
201TIE Vindman, Eugene D
VA-7
79.89 79.89 83.94 83.94 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
203 Riley, Josh D
NY-19
79.66 79.66 85.71 85.71 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
204 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
73.64 77.09 89.04 79.27 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
205TIE Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
71.79 76.54 69.60 69.09 Swing rank 5 rank 5
205TIE González, Vicente D
TX-34
75.98 76.54 85.99 70.91 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
207 Gillen, Laura D
NY-4
76.14 76.14 77.12 77.12 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
208 Davis, Don D
NC-1
71.74 75.98 73.41 69.31 Swing rank 5 rank 5
209 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
66.02 74.86 76.96 70.40 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
210 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
50.58 73.18 75.16 64.62 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
211 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
66.25 71.35 84.05 77.99 Leans Dem rank 5 rank 5
212 Gray, Adam D
CA-13
71.19 71.19 69.12 69.12 Leans Rep rank 5 rank 5
213 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
81.40 67.48 93.15 76.13 Strong Dem rank 5 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

Progressive Score vs. District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal District = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican District = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican District = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. District Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her district is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their districts. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their districts.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. District Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)