What: All Issues
 Who: Senate
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

2025-26 Progressive Scores Lifetime Progressive Scores
Rank Member of Congress Party State State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt
1 Warren, Elizabeth D
MA
Strong Dem 99.53 100.00 rank 5 99.19 98.72 rank 5
2 Markey, Ed D
MA
Strong Dem 99.65 99.77 rank 5 98.99 98.24 rank 5
3 Merkley, Jeff D
OR
Strong Dem 99.18 99.53 rank 5 98.23 97.35 rank 5
4 Van Hollen, Chris D
MD
Strong Dem 98.94 99.30 rank 5 96.52 96.26 rank 5
5 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE
Strong Dem 98.02 99.06 rank 5 98.02 99.06 N/A
(1st Term)
6 Smith, Tina 1 D
MN
Leans Dem 97.46 98.27 rank 5 96.14 95.74 rank 5
7 Murphy, Chris D
CT
Strong Dem 98.11 98.11 rank 5 92.81 89.95 rank 5
8 Wyden, Ron D
OR
Strong Dem 97.65 98.10 rank 5 93.61 90.19 rank 5
9 Hirono, Mazie D
HI
Strong Dem 97.21 97.90 rank 5 98.00 98.10 rank 5
10 Schumer, Chuck D
NY
Strong Dem 96.16 96.96 rank 5 94.92 92.25 rank 5
11 Blumenthal, Richard D
CT
Strong Dem 95.92 96.73 rank 5 96.29 94.75 rank 5
12 Schatz, Brian D
HI
Strong Dem 96.38 96.72 rank 5 96.67 95.86 rank 5
13 Sanders, Bernie I
VT
Strong Dem 97.91 96.35 rank 5 96.58 95.03 rank 5
14 Alsobrooks, Angela D
MD
Strong Dem 95.31 95.55 rank 5 95.31 95.55 N/A
(1st Term)
15 Padilla, Alex D
CA
Strong Dem 96.29 95.42 rank 5 97.38 95.22 rank 5
16 Cantwell, Maria D
WA
Strong Dem 94.32 95.34 rank 5 93.61 90.21 rank 5
17 Baldwin, Tammy D
WI
Swing 94.55 95.10 rank 5 95.31 95.03 rank 5
18 Lujan, Ben D
NM
Leans Dem 94.38 94.37 rank 5 96.43 94.43 rank 5
19 Murray, Patty D
WA
Strong Dem 95.00 94.09 rank 5 93.34 90.06 rank 5
20 Duckworth, Tammy D
IL
Strong Dem 94.87 93.38 rank 5 93.55 91.44 rank 5
21 Booker, Cory D
NJ
Leans Dem 95.20 93.11 rank 5 97.20 95.25 rank 5
22 Welch, Peter D
VT
Strong Dem 94.19 93.08 rank 5 95.99 94.40 rank 5
23 Kim, Andy D
NJ
Leans Dem 94.28 91.36 rank 5 94.27 91.36 rank 5
24 Ossoff, Jon D
GA
Swing 92.09 90.56 rank 5 95.16 92.28 rank 5
25 Schiff, Adam D
CA
Strong Dem 93.35 89.91 rank 5 92.98 89.27 rank 5
26 Bennet, Michael D
CO
Strong Dem 91.42 89.79 rank 5 90.05 83.84 rank 5
27 Whitehouse, Sheldon D
RI
Strong Dem 91.49 89.69 rank 5 94.02 91.68 rank 5
28 Gillibrand, Kirsten D
NY
Strong Dem 92.00 89.51 rank 5 97.17 94.78 rank 5
29 Hickenlooper, John D
CO
Strong Dem 90.98 89.44 rank 5 94.51 91.02 rank 5
30 Peters, Gary D
MI
Swing 90.92 89.36 rank 5 91.16 88.23 rank 5
31 Warnock, Raphael D
GA
Swing 91.48 88.86 rank 5 95.09 92.07 rank 5
32 Reed, Jack D
RI
Strong Dem 91.48 88.34 rank 5 95.02 93.52 rank 5
33 Durbin, Dick D
IL
Strong Dem 90.39 88.15 rank 5 94.48 93.75 rank 5
34 Klobuchar, Amy D
MN
Leans Dem 90.04 87.12 rank 5 92.34 87.47 rank 5
35 Cortez Masto, Catherine D
NV
Swing 87.63 86.45 rank 5 90.70 88.33 rank 5
36 Coons, Chris D
DE
Strong Dem 89.89 85.92 rank 5 90.37 84.15 rank 5
37 Heinrich, Martin D
NM
Leans Dem 88.86 84.98 rank 5 93.66 91.29 rank 5
38 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI
Swing 87.97 83.92 rank 5 87.97 83.92 N/A
(1st Term)
39 Kelly, Mark D
AZ
Swing 87.68 83.05 rank 5 92.02 86.66 rank 5
40 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ
Swing 86.62 82.40 rank 5 86.62 82.40 N/A
(1st Term)
41 Kaine, Tim D
VA
Leans Dem 87.24 81.03 rank 5 89.36 83.17 rank 5
42 Warner, Mark D
VA
Leans Dem 85.63 80.24 rank 5 87.32 78.05 rank 5
43 Rosen, Jacky D
NV
Swing 85.35 79.86 rank 5 89.25 83.21 rank 5
44 King, Angus I
ME
Leans Dem 83.00 79.01 rank 5 85.35 77.21 rank 5
45 Hassan, Maggie D
NH
Leans Dem 83.80 75.41 rank 5 86.69 79.49 rank 5
46 Shaheen, Jeanne D
NH
Leans Dem 81.06 74.94 rank 5 88.32 79.89 rank 5
47 Fetterman, John 1 D
PA
Swing 75.18 70.53 rank 5 81.67 75.54 rank 5
48 Collins, Susan R
ME
Leans Dem 16.20 22.84 rank 5 37.44 24.12 rank 5
49 Murkowski, Lisa R
AK
Strong Rep 13.98 20.09 rank 5 27.81 12.26 rank 5
50 Paul, Rand 1 R
KY
Strong Rep 13.32 14.08 rank 5 9.85 11.41 rank 5
51 Hawley, Josh R
MO
Strong Rep 4.16 6.21 rank 5 3.49 4.10 rank 5
52 Graham, Darline R
SC
Strong Rep 1.92 3.33 rank 5 1.92 3.33 N/A
(1st Term)
53 Sullivan, Dan R
AK
Strong Rep 3.76 3.07 rank 5 5.79 2.94 rank 5
54 McConnell, Mitch R
KY
Strong Rep 3.12 2.89 rank 5 6.14 1.70 rank 5
55 Tillis, Thom R
NC
Swing 3.26 2.43 rank 5 11.59 1.34 rank 5
56 Cassidy, Bill R
LA
Strong Rep 2.04 0.95 rank 5 6.89 1.40 rank 5
57 Lee, Mike R
UT
Strong Rep 0.94 0.71 rank 5 5.16 4.66 rank 5
58 Moran, Jerry R
KS
Strong Rep 1.56 0.48 rank 5 7.34 2.24 rank 5
59 Husted, Jon R
OH
Strong Rep 0.82 0.47 rank 5 0.82 0.47 N/A
(1st Term)
60TIE Budd, Ted R
NC
Swing 0.35 0.47 rank 5 1.30 0.32 rank 5
60TIE Curtis, John R
UT
Strong Rep 0.23 0.47 rank 5 0.23 0.47 N/A
(1st Term)
60TIE Kennedy, John R
LA
Strong Rep 0.70 0.47 rank 5 5.21 1.98 rank 5
60TIE Rounds, Mike R
SD
Strong Rep 1.17 0.47 rank 5 10.09 1.26 rank 5
64 Tuberville, Tommy R
AL
Strong Rep 0.36 0.24 rank 5 1.00 1.08 rank 5
65 Cramer, Kevin R
ND
Strong Rep 0.47 0.24 rank 5 4.99 1.00 rank 5
66 Daines, Steve R
MT
Strong Rep 0.12 0.24 rank 5 3.30 2.22 rank 5
67 Lummis, Cynthia R
WY
Strong Rep 0.12 0.24 rank 5 2.55 1.61 rank 5
68 Moody, Ashley R
FL
Strong Rep 1.06 0.24 rank 5 1.06 0.24 N/A
(1st Term)
69TIE Sheehy, Tim R
MT
Strong Rep 0.24 0.24 rank 5 0.24 0.24 N/A
(1st Term)
69TIE Wicker, Roger R
MS
Strong Rep 0.95 0.24 rank 5 7.01 0.87 rank 5
71TIE Banks, Jim R
IN
Strong Rep 0.12 0.23 rank 5 0.12 0.23 N/A
(1st Term)
71TIE Hyde-Smith, Cindy R
MS
Strong Rep 0.70 0.23 rank 5 3.34 0.25 rank 5
73 Fischer, Deb R
NE
Strong Rep 0.58 0.23 rank 5 2.67 0.33 rank 5
74TIE Scott, Rick R
FL
Strong Rep 1.16 0.23 rank 5 1.45 1.08 rank 5
74TIE Young, Todd R
IN
Strong Rep 0.47 0.23 rank 5 8.65 0.88 rank 5
76TIE Britt, Elizabeth R
AL
Strong Rep 0.23 0.23 rank 5 0.50 0.32 rank 5
76TIE Schmitt, Stephen R
MO
Strong Rep 0.12 0.23 rank 5 1.36 0.95 rank 5
78TIE Armstrong, Alan R
OK
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
78TIE Barrasso, John R
WY
Strong Rep 0.12 0.00 rank 5 1.99 0.79 rank 5
78TIE Blackburn, Marsha R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.97 0.55 rank 5
78TIE Boozman, John R
AR
Strong Rep 0.82 0.00 rank 5 3.27 0.73 rank 5
78TIE Capito, Shelley R
WV
Strong Rep 0.70 0.00 rank 5 10.45 1.11 rank 5
78TIE Cornyn, John R
TX
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 5.32 0.80 rank 5
78TIE Cotton, Tom R
AR
Strong Rep 0.23 0.00 rank 5 1.60 0.35 rank 5
78TIE Crapo, Mike R
ID
Strong Rep 0.12 0.00 rank 5 3.69 1.23 rank 5
78TIE Cruz, Ted R
TX
Strong Rep 0.48 0.00 rank 5 1.99 2.13 rank 5
78TIE Ernst, Joni R
IA
Strong Rep 0.24 0.00 rank 5 3.28 0.62 rank 5
78TIE Grassley, Chuck R
IA
Strong Rep 0.59 0.00 rank 5 8.35 3.73 rank 5
78TIE Hagerty, Bill R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.91 0.76 rank 5
78TIE Hoeven, John R
ND
Strong Rep 0.23 0.00 rank 5 5.31 1.64 rank 5
78TIE Johnson, Ron R
WI
Swing 0.23 0.00 rank 5 2.19 1.03 rank 5
78TIE Justice, Jim R
WV
Strong Rep 0.12 0.00 rank 5 0.12 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
78TIE Lankford, James R
OK
Strong Rep 0.23 0.00 rank 5 1.84 0.76 rank 5
78TIE Marshall, Roger R
KS
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.15 0.96 rank 5
78TIE McCormick, Dave R
PA
Swing 0.12 0.00 rank 5 0.12 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
78TIE Moreno, Bernie R
OH
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
78TIE Ricketts, Pete R
NE
Strong Rep 0.35 0.00 rank 5 2.01 0.00 rank 5
78TIE Risch, James R
ID
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.77 0.51 rank 5
78TIE Scott, Tim R
SC
Strong Rep 0.12 0.00 rank 5 1.94 0.86 rank 5
78TIE Thune, John R
SD
Strong Rep 2.09 0.00 rank 5 4.36 1.67 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

State Tilt

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic State = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic State = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal State = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican State = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican State = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

The “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” measure how naughty or nice a Senator's voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates Senators who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.