What: All Issues
 Who: Senate
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

2025-26 Progressive Scores Lifetime Progressive Scores
Rank Member of Congress Party State State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt
1 Warren, Elizabeth D
MA
Strong Dem 99.45 100.00 rank 5 99.16 98.67 rank 5
2 Markey, Ed D
MA
Strong Dem 99.59 99.73 rank 5 98.96 98.17 rank 5
3 Van Hollen, Chris D
MD
Strong Dem 99.32 99.46 rank 5 96.51 96.18 rank 5
4 Merkley, Jeff D
OR
Strong Dem 99.59 99.46 rank 5 98.27 97.26 rank 5
5 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE
Strong Dem 97.70 98.92 rank 5 97.70 98.92 N/A
(1st Term)
6 Smith, Tina 1 D
MN
Leans Dem 98.59 98.58 rank 5 96.38 95.71 rank 5
7 Murphy, Chris D
CT
Strong Dem 98.63 98.38 rank 5 92.75 89.73 rank 5
8 Hirono, Mazie D
HI
Strong Dem 97.57 98.13 rank 5 98.10 98.16 rank 5
9 Wyden, Ron D
OR
Strong Dem 97.94 97.82 rank 5 93.57 90.01 rank 5
10 Schumer, Chuck D
NY
Strong Dem 96.48 97.05 rank 5 94.93 92.16 rank 5
11 Schatz, Brian D
HI
Strong Dem 97.43 97.04 rank 5 96.88 95.91 rank 5
12 Sanders, Bernie I
VT
Strong Dem 98.13 96.91 rank 5 96.58 95.10 rank 5
13 Blumenthal, Richard D
CT
Strong Dem 96.07 96.78 rank 5 96.33 94.70 rank 5
14 Padilla, Alex D
CA
Strong Dem 96.64 95.28 rank 5 97.57 95.14 rank 5
15 Cantwell, Maria D
WA
Strong Dem 94.88 95.19 rank 5 93.66 90.08 rank 5
16 Alsobrooks, Angela D
MD
Strong Dem 95.08 95.16 rank 5 95.08 95.16 N/A
(1st Term)
17 Baldwin, Tammy D
WI
Swing 95.01 94.39 rank 5 95.43 94.84 rank 5
18 Lujan, Ben D
NM
Leans Dem 94.82 93.80 rank 5 96.71 94.20 rank 5
19 Murray, Patty D
WA
Strong Dem 95.55 93.48 rank 5 93.36 89.93 rank 5
20 Booker, Cory D
NJ
Leans Dem 95.40 92.90 rank 5 97.32 95.28 rank 5
21 Duckworth, Tammy D
IL
Strong Dem 94.56 92.39 rank 5 93.42 91.08 rank 5
22 Welch, Peter D
VT
Strong Dem 94.20 92.31 rank 5 96.17 94.04 rank 5
23 Bennet, Michael D
CO
Strong Dem 93.67 92.12 rank 5 90.39 84.16 rank 5
24 Kim, Andy D
NJ
Leans Dem 93.89 90.88 rank 5 93.90 90.91 rank 5
25 Whitehouse, Sheldon D
RI
Strong Dem 91.91 90.61 rank 5 94.14 91.91 rank 5
26 Ossoff, Jon D
GA
Swing 92.15 90.22 rank 5 95.37 92.25 rank 5
27 Hickenlooper, John D
CO
Strong Dem 91.28 88.98 rank 5 94.83 90.92 rank 5
28 Gillibrand, Kirsten D
NY
Strong Dem 91.68 88.77 rank 5 97.26 94.78 rank 5
29 Schiff, Adam D
CA
Strong Dem 92.85 88.71 rank 5 92.43 88.02 rank 5
30 Peters, Gary D
MI
Swing 91.08 88.62 rank 5 91.20 87.99 rank 5
31 Warnock, Raphael D
GA
Swing 91.18 88.56 rank 5 95.20 92.15 rank 5
32 Durbin, Dick D
IL
Strong Dem 90.75 88.01 rank 5 94.59 93.84 rank 5
33 Reed, Jack D
RI
Strong Dem 91.30 87.70 rank 5 95.06 93.54 rank 5
34 Klobuchar, Amy D
MN
Leans Dem 90.34 86.56 rank 5 92.44 87.37 rank 5
35 Coons, Chris D
DE
Strong Dem 90.51 86.03 rank 5 90.50 84.11 rank 5
36 Cortez Masto, Catherine D
NV
Swing 87.38 85.29 rank 5 90.77 88.08 rank 5
37 Heinrich, Martin D
NM
Leans Dem 89.35 84.64 rank 5 93.91 91.44 rank 5
38 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI
Swing 87.76 82.61 rank 5 87.76 82.61 N/A
(1st Term)
39 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ
Swing 86.38 81.36 rank 5 86.38 81.36 N/A
(1st Term)
40 Kelly, Mark D
AZ
Swing 86.10 80.55 rank 5 91.72 85.86 rank 5
41 Kaine, Tim D
VA
Leans Dem 86.77 79.30 rank 5 89.34 82.81 rank 5
42 Rosen, Jacky D
NV
Swing 85.15 78.82 rank 5 89.37 83.02 rank 5
43 Warner, Mark D
VA
Leans Dem 84.92 78.17 rank 5 87.25 77.53 rank 5
44 King, Angus I
ME
Leans Dem 82.65 77.51 rank 5 85.35 76.77 rank 5
45 Shaheen, Jeanne D
NH
Leans Dem 81.73 74.25 rank 5 88.62 79.89 rank 5
46 Hassan, Maggie D
NH
Leans Dem 82.49 72.85 rank 5 86.49 78.93 rank 5
47 Fetterman, John 1 D
PA
Swing 75.57 71.87 rank 5 82.59 76.92 rank 5
48 Collins, Susan R
ME
Leans Dem 14.80 21.39 rank 5 37.66 23.96 rank 5
49 Murkowski, Lisa R
AK
Strong Rep 13.09 19.46 rank 5 27.99 11.98 rank 5
50 Paul, Rand 1 R
KY
Strong Rep 13.06 14.01 rank 5 9.69 11.30 rank 5
51 Hawley, Josh R
MO
Strong Rep 4.30 6.30 rank 5 3.49 4.02 rank 5
52 McConnell, Mitch R
KY
Strong Rep 3.24 3.30 rank 5 6.19 1.73 rank 5
53 Sullivan, Dan R
AK
Strong Rep 3.28 2.98 rank 5 5.76 2.90 rank 5
54 Tillis, Thom R
NC
Swing 2.47 2.49 rank 5 11.70 1.32 rank 5
55 Moran, Jerry R
KS
Strong Rep 1.26 0.55 rank 5 7.46 2.32 rank 5
56 Lee, Mike R
UT
Strong Rep 0.96 0.54 rank 5 5.30 4.75 rank 5
57 Curtis, John R
UT
Strong Rep 0.27 0.54 rank 5 0.27 0.54 N/A
(1st Term)
58 Budd, Ted R
NC
Swing 0.41 0.53 rank 5 1.42 0.34 rank 5
59 Daines, Steve R
MT
Strong Rep 0.14 0.27 rank 5 3.42 2.31 rank 5
60TIE Cassidy, Bill R
LA
Strong Rep 0.70 0.27 rank 5 6.77 1.24 rank 5
60TIE Lummis, Cynthia R
WY
Strong Rep 0.14 0.27 rank 5 2.71 1.71 rank 5
62 Moody, Ashley R
FL
Strong Rep 0.27 0.27 rank 5 0.27 0.27 N/A
(1st Term)
63 Sheehy, Tim R
MT
Strong Rep 0.27 0.27 rank 5 0.27 0.27 N/A
(1st Term)
64 Fischer, Deb R
NE
Strong Rep 0.68 0.27 rank 5 2.75 0.34 rank 5
65 Young, Todd R
IN
Strong Rep 0.54 0.27 rank 5 9.01 0.92 rank 5
66TIE Armstrong, Alan R
OK
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Banks, Jim R
IN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Barrasso, John R
WY
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 2.04 0.81 rank 5
66TIE Blackburn, Marsha R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.01 0.58 rank 5
66TIE Boozman, John R
AR
Strong Rep 0.95 0.00 rank 5 3.37 0.76 rank 5
66TIE Britt, Elizabeth R
AL
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.47 0.17 rank 5
66TIE Capito, Shelley R
WV
Strong Rep 0.82 0.00 rank 5 10.85 1.16 rank 5
66TIE Cornyn, John R
TX
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 5.43 0.82 rank 5
66TIE Cotton, Tom R
AR
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 1.65 0.36 rank 5
66TIE Cramer, Kevin R
ND
Strong Rep 0.41 0.00 rank 5 5.19 0.96 rank 5
66TIE Crapo, Mike R
ID
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 3.76 1.25 rank 5
66TIE Cruz, Ted R
TX
Strong Rep 0.56 0.00 rank 5 2.06 2.22 rank 5
66TIE Ernst, Joni R
IA
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 3.40 0.65 rank 5
66TIE Graham, Lindsey R
SC
Strong Rep 0.84 0.00 rank 5 15.36 4.46 rank 5
66TIE Grassley, Chuck R
IA
Strong Rep 0.69 0.00 rank 5 8.48 3.78 rank 5
66TIE Hagerty, Bill R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.03 0.80 rank 5
66TIE Hoeven, John R
ND
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 5.47 1.70 rank 5
66TIE Husted, Jon R
OH
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Hyde-Smith, Cindy R
MS
Strong Rep 0.68 0.00 rank 5 3.46 0.18 rank 5
66TIE Johnson, Ron R
WI
Swing 0.27 0.00 rank 5 2.26 1.07 rank 5
66TIE Justice, Jim R
WV
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Kennedy, John R
LA
Strong Rep 0.54 0.00 rank 5 5.36 1.91 rank 5
66TIE Lankford, James R
OK
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 1.91 0.79 rank 5
66TIE Marshall, Roger R
KS
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.28 1.02 rank 5
66TIE McCormick, Dave R
PA
Swing 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Moreno, Bernie R
OH
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
66TIE Ricketts, Pete R
NE
Strong Rep 0.41 0.00 rank 5 2.19 0.00 rank 5
66TIE Risch, James R
ID
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.84 0.53 rank 5
66TIE Rounds, Mike R
SD
Strong Rep 1.08 0.00 rank 5 10.40 1.17 rank 5
66TIE Schmitt, Stephen R
MO
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.42 0.87 rank 5
66TIE Scott, Rick R
FL
Strong Rep 0.40 0.00 rank 5 1.24 1.04 rank 5
66TIE Scott, Tim R
SC
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 2.01 0.89 rank 5
66TIE Thune, John R
SD
Strong Rep 2.29 0.00 rank 5 4.44 1.71 rank 5
66TIE Tuberville, Tommy R
AL
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.96 1.03 rank 5
66TIE Wicker, Roger R
MS
Strong Rep 0.97 0.00 rank 5 7.17 0.84 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

State Tilt

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic State = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic State = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal State = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican State = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican State = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

The “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” measure how naughty or nice a Senator's voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates Senators who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.