What: All Issues
 Who: Senate
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

2025-26 Progressive Scores Lifetime Progressive Scores
Rank Member of Congress Party State State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt
1 Warren, Elizabeth D
MA
Strong Dem 99.45 100.00 rank 5 99.16 98.66 rank 5
2 Markey, Ed D
MA
Strong Dem 99.59 99.73 rank 5 98.96 98.17 rank 5
3 Van Hollen, Chris D
MD
Strong Dem 99.31 99.46 rank 5 96.50 96.17 rank 5
4 Merkley, Jeff D
OR
Strong Dem 99.59 99.46 rank 5 98.27 97.25 rank 5
5 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE
Strong Dem 97.67 98.91 rank 5 97.67 98.91 N/A
(1st Term)
6 Smith, Tina 1 D
MN
Leans Dem 98.57 98.55 rank 5 96.37 95.69 rank 5
7 Murphy, Chris D
CT
Strong Dem 98.61 98.36 rank 5 92.73 89.69 rank 5
8 Hirono, Mazie D
HI
Strong Dem 97.54 98.10 rank 5 98.09 98.16 rank 5
9 Wyden, Ron D
OR
Strong Dem 97.92 97.79 rank 5 93.57 89.99 rank 5
10 Schumer, Chuck D
NY
Strong Dem 96.44 97.01 rank 5 94.92 92.15 rank 5
11 Schatz, Brian D
HI
Strong Dem 97.39 97.00 rank 5 96.88 95.90 rank 5
12 Sanders, Bernie I
VT
Strong Dem 98.10 96.87 rank 5 96.57 95.09 rank 5
13 Blumenthal, Richard D
CT
Strong Dem 96.02 96.74 rank 5 96.32 94.68 rank 5
14 Padilla, Alex D
CA
Strong Dem 96.60 95.21 rank 5 97.56 95.12 rank 5
15 Cantwell, Maria D
WA
Strong Dem 94.82 95.12 rank 5 93.65 90.06 rank 5
16 Alsobrooks, Angela D
MD
Strong Dem 95.02 95.10 rank 5 95.02 95.10 N/A
(1st Term)
17 Baldwin, Tammy D
WI
Swing 94.95 94.31 rank 5 95.42 94.82 rank 5
18 Lujan, Ben D
NM
Leans Dem 94.75 93.72 rank 5 96.70 94.16 rank 5
19 Murray, Patty D
WA
Strong Dem 95.63 93.66 rank 5 93.37 89.95 rank 5
20 Booker, Cory D
NJ
Leans Dem 95.34 92.80 rank 5 97.31 95.27 rank 5
21 Bennet, Michael D
CO
Strong Dem 93.89 92.56 rank 5 90.42 84.23 rank 5
22 Duckworth, Tammy D
IL
Strong Dem 94.49 92.29 rank 5 93.40 91.04 rank 5
23 Welch, Peter D
VT
Strong Dem 94.13 92.20 rank 5 96.14 93.98 rank 5
24 Kim, Andy D
NJ
Leans Dem 93.82 90.76 rank 5 93.83 90.79 rank 5
25 Whitehouse, Sheldon D
RI
Strong Dem 91.81 90.48 rank 5 94.13 91.89 rank 5
26 Ossoff, Jon D
GA
Swing 92.05 90.08 rank 5 95.35 92.21 rank 5
27 Hickenlooper, John D
CO
Strong Dem 91.17 88.83 rank 5 94.80 90.87 rank 5
28 Gillibrand, Kirsten D
NY
Strong Dem 91.59 88.62 rank 5 97.25 94.77 rank 5
29 Schiff, Adam D
CA
Strong Dem 92.76 88.56 rank 5 92.34 87.86 rank 5
30 Peters, Gary D
MI
Swing 90.97 88.46 rank 5 91.18 87.94 rank 5
31 Warnock, Raphael D
GA
Swing 91.07 88.40 rank 5 95.18 92.10 rank 5
32 Durbin, Dick D
IL
Strong Dem 90.63 87.85 rank 5 94.58 93.83 rank 5
33 Reed, Jack D
RI
Strong Dem 91.20 87.53 rank 5 95.05 93.52 rank 5
34 Klobuchar, Amy D
MN
Leans Dem 90.22 86.38 rank 5 92.43 87.33 rank 5
35 Coons, Chris D
DE
Strong Dem 90.53 86.12 rank 5 90.50 84.13 rank 5
36 Cortez Masto, Catherine D
NV
Swing 87.22 85.09 rank 5 90.74 88.03 rank 5
37 Heinrich, Martin D
NM
Leans Dem 89.22 84.43 rank 5 93.90 91.41 rank 5
38 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI
Swing 87.60 82.37 rank 5 87.60 82.37 N/A
(1st Term)
39 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ
Swing 86.20 81.09 rank 5 86.20 81.09 N/A
(1st Term)
40 Kelly, Mark D
AZ
Swing 85.92 80.28 rank 5 91.68 85.78 rank 5
41 Kaine, Tim D
VA
Leans Dem 86.60 79.02 rank 5 89.31 82.75 rank 5
42 Rosen, Jacky D
NV
Swing 84.97 78.53 rank 5 89.34 82.94 rank 5
43 Warner, Mark D
VA
Leans Dem 84.72 77.87 rank 5 87.23 77.46 rank 5
44 King, Angus I
ME
Leans Dem 82.43 77.20 rank 5 85.32 76.69 rank 5
45 Shaheen, Jeanne D
NH
Leans Dem 81.50 73.89 rank 5 88.60 79.84 rank 5
46 Hassan, Maggie D
NH
Leans Dem 82.27 72.48 rank 5 86.45 78.85 rank 5
47 Fetterman, John 1 D
PA
Swing 75.98 72.03 rank 5 82.89 77.08 rank 5
48 Collins, Susan R
ME
Leans Dem 14.58 20.87 rank 5 37.66 23.90 rank 5
49 Murkowski, Lisa R
AK
Strong Rep 13.11 19.45 rank 5 28.01 11.96 rank 5
50 Paul, Rand 1 R
KY
Strong Rep 13.08 13.93 rank 5 9.69 11.28 rank 5
51 Hawley, Josh R
MO
Strong Rep 4.21 6.11 rank 5 3.47 3.95 rank 5
52 McConnell, Mitch R
KY
Strong Rep 3.28 3.34 rank 5 6.20 1.73 rank 5
53 Sullivan, Dan R
AK
Strong Rep 3.32 3.02 rank 5 5.78 2.92 rank 5
54 Tillis, Thom R
NC
Swing 2.50 2.53 rank 5 11.74 1.32 rank 5
55 Moran, Jerry R
KS
Strong Rep 1.27 0.56 rank 5 7.48 2.33 rank 5
56 Lee, Mike R
UT
Strong Rep 0.97 0.55 rank 5 5.31 4.77 rank 5
57 Curtis, John R
UT
Strong Rep 0.28 0.54 rank 5 0.28 0.54 N/A
(1st Term)
58 Budd, Ted R
NC
Swing 0.41 0.54 rank 5 1.43 0.35 rank 5
59 Daines, Steve R
MT
Strong Rep 0.14 0.28 rank 5 3.43 2.32 rank 5
60 Lummis, Cynthia R
WY
Strong Rep 0.14 0.28 rank 5 2.72 1.72 rank 5
61 Moody, Ashley R
FL
Strong Rep 0.28 0.28 rank 5 0.28 0.28 N/A
(1st Term)
62 Sheehy, Tim R
MT
Strong Rep 0.28 0.27 rank 5 0.28 0.27 N/A
(1st Term)
63 Fischer, Deb R
NE
Strong Rep 0.69 0.27 rank 5 2.76 0.34 rank 5
64 Young, Todd R
IN
Strong Rep 0.55 0.27 rank 5 9.04 0.92 rank 5
65TIE Armstrong, Alan R
OK
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Banks, Jim R
IN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Barrasso, John R
WY
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 2.05 0.81 rank 5
65TIE Blackburn, Marsha R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.01 0.58 rank 5
65TIE Boozman, John R
AR
Strong Rep 0.96 0.00 rank 5 3.38 0.76 rank 5
65TIE Britt, Elizabeth R
AL
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.48 0.17 rank 5
65TIE Capito, Shelley R
WV
Strong Rep 0.83 0.00 rank 5 10.87 1.16 rank 5
65TIE Cassidy, Bill R
LA
Strong Rep 0.57 0.00 rank 5 6.76 1.17 rank 5
65TIE Cornyn, John R
TX
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 5.44 0.82 rank 5
65TIE Cotton, Tom R
AR
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 1.66 0.36 rank 5
65TIE Cramer, Kevin R
ND
Strong Rep 0.42 0.00 rank 5 5.21 0.96 rank 5
65TIE Crapo, Mike R
ID
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 3.77 1.25 rank 5
65TIE Cruz, Ted R
TX
Strong Rep 0.56 0.00 rank 5 2.06 2.22 rank 5
65TIE Ernst, Joni R
IA
Strong Rep 0.28 0.00 rank 5 3.41 0.65 rank 5
65TIE Graham, Lindsey R
SC
Strong Rep 0.85 0.00 rank 5 15.38 4.47 rank 5
65TIE Grassley, Chuck R
IA
Strong Rep 0.70 0.00 rank 5 8.49 3.79 rank 5
65TIE Hagerty, Bill R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.04 0.81 rank 5
65TIE Hoeven, John R
ND
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 5.48 1.71 rank 5
65TIE Husted, Jon R
OH
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Hyde-Smith, Cindy R
MS
Strong Rep 0.69 0.00 rank 5 3.47 0.18 rank 5
65TIE Johnson, Ron R
WI
Swing 0.27 0.00 rank 5 2.26 1.07 rank 5
65TIE Justice, Jim R
WV
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Kennedy, John R
LA
Strong Rep 0.55 0.00 rank 5 5.37 1.92 rank 5
65TIE Lankford, James R
OK
Strong Rep 0.27 0.00 rank 5 1.91 0.79 rank 5
65TIE Marshall, Roger R
KS
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.29 1.03 rank 5
65TIE McCormick, Dave R
PA
Swing 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.14 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Moreno, Bernie R
OH
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
65TIE Ricketts, Pete R
NE
Strong Rep 0.41 0.00 rank 5 2.21 0.00 rank 5
65TIE Risch, James R
ID
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.85 0.53 rank 5
65TIE Rounds, Mike R
SD
Strong Rep 1.09 0.00 rank 5 10.43 1.17 rank 5
65TIE Schmitt, Stephen R
MO
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.43 0.88 rank 5
65TIE Scott, Rick R
FL
Strong Rep 0.41 0.00 rank 5 1.24 1.05 rank 5
65TIE Scott, Tim R
SC
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 2.01 0.89 rank 5
65TIE Thune, John R
SD
Strong Rep 2.32 0.00 rank 5 4.45 1.72 rank 5
65TIE Tuberville, Tommy R
AL
Strong Rep 0.14 0.00 rank 5 0.96 1.04 rank 5
65TIE Wicker, Roger R
MS
Strong Rep 0.98 0.00 rank 5 7.18 0.84 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

State Tilt

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic State = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic State = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal State = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican State = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican State = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

The “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” measure how naughty or nice a Senator's voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates Senators who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.