What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2025-26 Lifetime 2025-26 % Rating
1 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.72 75.00 75.37 66.13 Leans Rep - 23.61 rank 5
2 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
65.02 76.19 77.36 69.35 Leans Rep - 8.31 rank 5
3 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
72.87 75.00 89.51 76.61 Leans Rep - 0.46 rank 5
4 González, Vicente D
TX-34
76.11 78.57 86.82 72.58 Leans Rep + 2.78 rank 5
5 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.15 79.76 88.72 82.11 Leans Rep + 2.82 rank 5
6 Gray, Adam D
CA-13
77.38 77.38 74.19 74.19 Leans Rep + 4.05 rank 5
7 Davis, Don D
NC-1
70.90 76.19 74.25 70.97 Swing - 5.77 rank 5
8 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
70.96 77.38 69.44 67.21 Swing - 5.71 rank 5
9 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
74.73 79.76 83.45 82.11 Swing - 1.94 rank 5
10 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
75.24 75.00 89.05 81.45 Swing - 1.43 rank 5
11 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
76.68 77.38 89.98 82.26 Swing + 0.01 rank 5
12 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
79.91 82.14 86.08 84.68 Swing + 3.24 rank 5
13 McDonald Rivet, Kristen D
MI-8
80.95 80.95 81.45 81.45 Swing + 4.28 rank 5
14 Tran, Derek D
CA-45
82.14 82.14 87.90 87.90 Swing + 5.47 rank 5
15 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
85.31 85.54 90.74 90.24 Swing + 8.64 rank 5
16 Pou, Nellie D
NJ-9
91.67 91.67 94.35 94.35 Swing + 15.00 rank 5
17 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
54.46 85.37 76.85 84.30 Leans Dem - 25.54 rank 5
18 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
64.71 60.26 84.08 70.09 Leans Dem - 15.29 rank 5
19 Gillen, Laura D
NY-4
75.00 75.00 76.61 76.61 Leans Dem - 5.00 rank 5
20 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
75.36 95.06 90.59 96.67 Leans Dem - 4.64 rank 5
21 Riley, Josh D
NY-19
76.83 76.83 84.17 84.17 Leans Dem - 3.17 rank 5
22 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
77.43 79.76 89.63 85.48 Leans Dem - 2.57 rank 5
23 Vindman, Eugene D
VA-7
78.57 78.57 84.43 84.43 Leans Dem - 1.43 rank 5
24 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
78.63 83.33 90.69 88.71 Leans Dem - 1.37 rank 5
25 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
78.65 79.76 86.85 86.18 Leans Dem - 1.35 rank 5
26 Whitesides, George D
CA-27
79.01 79.01 83.76 83.76 Leans Dem - 0.99 rank 5
27 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
79.03 82.14 86.33 87.90 Leans Dem - 0.97 rank 5
28 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
81.20 81.93 92.36 87.80 Leans Dem + 1.20 rank 5
29 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
81.53 82.14 92.12 87.90 Leans Dem + 1.53 rank 5
30 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
82.83 81.48 90.93 87.39 Leans Dem + 2.83 rank 5
31 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.08 88.10 94.00 91.87 Leans Dem + 3.08 rank 5
32 Goodlander, Maggie D
NH-2
83.33 83.33 87.90 87.90 Leans Dem + 3.33 rank 5
33 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.19 92.77 93.86 95.00 Leans Dem + 4.19 rank 5
34 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
84.72 89.29 93.84 92.74 Leans Dem + 4.72 rank 5
35 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
85.77 84.52 93.91 89.52 Leans Dem + 5.77 rank 5
36 Min, Dave D
CA-47
86.90 86.90 89.43 89.43 Leans Dem + 6.90 rank 5
37 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.67 93.90 95.03 95.80 Leans Dem + 7.67 rank 5
38 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
92.59 98.81 96.25 99.18 Leans Dem + 12.59 rank 5
39 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.65 91.25 95.99 93.86 Leans Dem + 14.65 rank 5
40 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
61.32 86.75 81.10 87.50 Strong Dem - 22.01 rank 5
41 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
69.86 90.48 87.36 93.44 Strong Dem - 13.47 rank 5
42 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.01 95.12 88.98 96.72 Strong Dem - 11.32 rank 5
43 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
73.81 96.34 90.17 96.67 Strong Dem - 9.52 rank 5
44 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
74.00 84.34 88.98 89.43 Strong Dem - 9.33 rank 5
45 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
74.49 82.14 87.53 86.99 Strong Dem - 8.84 rank 5
46 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.32 91.57 86.71 91.87 Strong Dem - 8.01 rank 5
47 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
75.87 85.71 90.60 90.24 Strong Dem - 7.46 rank 5
48 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
75.92 98.78 88.77 99.17 Strong Dem - 7.41 rank 5
49 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
76.40 72.22 90.26 78.72 Strong Dem - 6.93 rank 5
50 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
76.70 78.57 84.55 83.06 Strong Dem - 6.63 rank 5
51 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
77.19 91.57 90.72 93.50 Strong Dem - 6.14 rank 5
52 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
77.72 91.67 91.02 94.21 Strong Dem - 5.61 rank 5
53 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
77.90 95.24 91.59 96.77 Strong Dem - 5.43 rank 5
54 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
78.19 91.57 89.89 94.17 Strong Dem - 5.14 rank 5
55 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
78.97 97.59 92.37 98.36 Strong Dem - 4.36 rank 5
56 Cisneros, Gil D
CA-31
79.43 94.05 95.23 95.97 Strong Dem - 3.90 rank 5
57 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
79.75 83.33 91.82 88.71 Strong Dem - 3.58 rank 5
58 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.84 88.10 93.12 91.94 Strong Dem - 3.49 rank 5
59 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
80.31 79.52 87.70 85.37 Strong Dem - 3.02 rank 5
60 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
80.32 85.71 92.11 89.52 Strong Dem - 3.01 rank 5
61 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
80.80 96.39 92.95 97.56 Strong Dem - 2.53 rank 5
62 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
81.17 88.10 92.46 89.52 Strong Dem - 2.16 rank 5
63 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.18 90.24 91.79 91.80 Strong Dem - 2.15 rank 5
64 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.44 84.52 87.98 88.71 Strong Dem - 1.89 rank 5
65 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
81.49 79.01 92.03 85.83 Strong Dem - 1.84 rank 5
66 McClain-Delaney, April D
MD-6
82.14 82.14 86.89 86.89 Strong Dem - 1.19 rank 5
67 Norcross, Donald 1 D
NJ-1
82.22 91.49 93.62 94.20 Strong Dem - 1.11 rank 5
68 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
82.74 89.29 89.94 92.74 Strong Dem - 0.59 rank 5
69 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
82.75 95.12 91.64 96.64 Strong Dem - 0.58 rank 5
70 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.87 96.39 91.84 97.54 Strong Dem - 0.46 rank 5
71 Green, Al D
TX-9
82.98 98.81 93.49 98.35 Strong Dem - 0.35 rank 5
72 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.07 91.67 92.54 93.55 Strong Dem - 0.26 rank 5
73 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
83.11 93.75 93.43 95.69 Strong Dem - 0.22 rank 5
74 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.26 97.62 91.96 98.36 Strong Dem - 0.07 rank 5
75 Mannion, John D
NY-22
83.33 83.33 87.90 87.90 Strong Dem + 0.00 rank 5
76 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
83.35 86.08 92.20 89.47 Strong Dem + 0.02 rank 5
77 Garamendi, John 1 D
CA-8
83.52 92.59 93.09 94.50 Strong Dem + 0.19 rank 5
78 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
83.87 96.43 94.07 97.54 Strong Dem + 0.54 rank 5
79 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
83.89 91.36 93.97 93.97 Strong Dem + 0.56 rank 5
80 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
84.15 90.48 93.67 93.44 Strong Dem + 0.82 rank 5
81 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
84.38 98.81 91.80 98.39 Strong Dem + 1.05 rank 5
82 Figures, Shomari D
AL-2
84.52 84.52 88.62 88.62 Strong Dem + 1.19 rank 5
83 Fields, Cleo D
LA-6
84.77 93.98 90.12 95.93 Strong Dem + 1.44 rank 5
84 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
85.12 100.00 94.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 1.79 rank 5
85 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.58 91.67 93.43 94.17 Strong Dem + 2.25 rank 5
86 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
85.62 94.05 93.97 95.97 Strong Dem + 2.29 rank 5
87 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
85.69 96.43 93.32 97.50 Strong Dem + 2.36 rank 5
88 Subramanyam, Suhas D
VA-10
85.71 85.71 90.32 90.32 Strong Dem + 2.38 rank 5
89 Bynum, Janelle D
OR-5
85.71 85.71 89.52 89.52 Strong Dem + 2.38 rank 5
90 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.85 90.12 94.64 93.33 Strong Dem + 2.52 rank 5
91 Pettersen, Brittany 1 D
CO-7
85.98 91.94 91.00 93.90 Strong Dem + 2.65 rank 5
92 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.08 85.71 93.88 90.24 Strong Dem + 2.75 rank 5
93 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
86.12 93.98 94.36 95.93 Strong Dem + 2.79 rank 5
94 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.17 98.81 92.96 99.19 Strong Dem + 2.84 rank 5
95 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.48 90.12 93.34 93.16 Strong Dem + 3.15 rank 5
96 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.69 92.77 94.81 95.12 Strong Dem + 3.36 rank 5
97 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
86.80 89.16 93.96 92.50 Strong Dem + 3.47 rank 5
98 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
87.02 94.05 94.57 95.93 Strong Dem + 3.69 rank 5
99 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
87.20 96.43 94.84 97.58 Strong Dem + 3.87 rank 5
100 Kennedy, Tim D
NY-26
87.63 89.29 92.43 92.74 Strong Dem + 4.30 rank 5
101 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
87.66 95.18 93.03 96.72 Strong Dem + 4.33 rank 5
102 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.76 95.24 93.76 96.75 Strong Dem + 4.43 rank 5
103 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.85 95.24 93.75 96.77 Strong Dem + 4.52 rank 5
104 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.93 97.62 94.59 98.39 Strong Dem + 4.60 rank 5
105 Conaway, Herb D
NJ-3
87.95 87.95 91.80 91.80 Strong Dem + 4.62 rank 5
106 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
88.08 91.57 94.58 94.31 Strong Dem + 4.75 rank 5
107 Carson, André D
IN-7
88.21 95.24 95.35 96.77 Strong Dem + 4.88 rank 5
108 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
88.28 96.43 95.13 97.58 Strong Dem + 4.95 rank 5
109 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
88.40 92.86 92.45 95.16 Strong Dem + 5.07 rank 5
110 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.46 100.00 93.35 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.13 rank 5
111 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
88.54 95.18 95.17 96.75 Strong Dem + 5.21 rank 5
112 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.61 85.71 95.28 90.18 Strong Dem + 5.28 rank 5
113 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.77 93.90 92.60 94.96 Strong Dem + 5.44 rank 5
114 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.91 96.39 95.92 97.52 Strong Dem + 5.58 rank 5
115 McBride, Sarah D
DE-AL
89.29 89.29 92.74 92.74 Strong Dem + 5.96 rank 5
116 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.77 85.71 95.60 88.99 Strong Dem + 6.44 rank 5
117 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.88 97.62 95.35 98.39 Strong Dem + 6.55 rank 5
118 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
89.95 96.39 95.88 97.56 Strong Dem + 6.62 rank 5
119 Castro, Joaquin 1 D
TX-20
90.11 97.59 95.96 98.37 Strong Dem + 6.78 rank 5
120 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.41 93.98 96.07 95.93 Strong Dem + 7.08 rank 5
121 Johnson, Julie D
TX-32
90.48 90.48 91.94 91.94 Strong Dem + 7.15 rank 5
122 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.57 91.57 95.87 94.12 Strong Dem + 7.24 rank 5
123 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
90.61 91.67 92.61 94.35 Strong Dem + 7.28 rank 5
124 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.96 95.24 95.77 96.77 Strong Dem + 7.63 rank 5
125 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.02 95.24 94.33 96.77 Strong Dem + 7.69 rank 5
126 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
91.24 98.81 96.36 99.18 Strong Dem + 7.91 rank 5
127 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.49 98.81 96.31 99.19 Strong Dem + 8.16 rank 5
128 Latimer, George D
NY-16
91.57 91.57 94.31 94.31 Strong Dem + 8.24 rank 5
129 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.59 100.00 95.43 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.26 rank 5
130 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
91.62 98.81 96.14 99.19 Strong Dem + 8.29 rank 5
131 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
91.67 86.90 94.54 91.06 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
132 Elfreth, Sarah D
MD-3
91.67 91.67 94.35 94.35 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
133 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.09 96.34 96.67 97.54 Strong Dem + 8.76 rank 5
134 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.16 92.86 94.77 95.16 Strong Dem + 8.83 rank 5
135 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.25 97.62 96.46 98.39 Strong Dem + 8.92 rank 5
136 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.26 90.48 94.56 93.33 Strong Dem + 8.93 rank 5
137 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.47 98.78 96.67 99.17 Strong Dem + 9.14 rank 5
138 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
92.77 89.29 95.32 92.44 Strong Dem + 9.44 rank 5
139 Olszewski, Johnny D
MD-2
92.86 92.86 95.16 95.16 Strong Dem + 9.53 rank 5
140 Pelosi, Nancy 1 2 D
CA-11
92.92 97.37 94.86 98.11 Strong Dem + 9.59 rank 5
141 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.00 93.98 93.88 95.93 Strong Dem + 9.67 rank 5
142 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.11 94.05 95.30 95.97 Strong Dem + 9.78 rank 5
143 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.23 96.39 96.03 97.52 Strong Dem + 9.90 rank 5
144 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.29 100.00 96.34 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
145 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.32 95.12 95.26 95.87 Strong Dem + 9.99 rank 5
146 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.41 98.80 97.08 99.17 Strong Dem + 10.08 rank 5
147 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
93.44 97.62 94.35 98.39 Strong Dem + 10.11 rank 5
148 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
93.47 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.14 rank 5
149 Mullin, Kevin 1 D
CA-15
93.72 98.63 94.85 99.05 Strong Dem + 10.39 rank 5
150 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.94 98.81 96.95 99.19 Strong Dem + 10.61 rank 5
151 Morrison, Kelly D
MN-3
94.05 94.05 95.93 95.93 Strong Dem + 10.72 rank 5
152 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
94.08 94.05 95.32 95.93 Strong Dem + 10.75 rank 5
153 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
94.12 98.77 97.25 99.14 Strong Dem + 10.79 rank 5
154 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.51 100.00 97.64 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.18 rank 5
155 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
94.67 98.81 97.28 99.19 Strong Dem + 11.34 rank 5
156 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
94.71 92.50 95.99 93.91 Strong Dem + 11.38 rank 5
157 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.92 100.00 96.93 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.59 rank 5
158 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.05 93.83 97.21 95.76 Strong Dem + 11.72 rank 5
159 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.09 100.00 97.23 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.76 rank 5
160 Friedman, Laura D
CA-30
95.18 95.18 96.75 96.75 Strong Dem + 11.85 rank 5
161 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
95.21 98.80 97.17 99.19 Strong Dem + 11.88 rank 5
162 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.21 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.88 rank 5
163 Liccardo, Sam D
CA-16
95.24 95.24 96.77 96.77 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
164 Bell, Wesley D
MO-1
95.24 95.24 95.97 95.97 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
165 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
95.37 95.24 94.73 96.77 Strong Dem + 12.04 rank 5
166 Bonamici, Suzanne 1 D
OR-1
95.48 100.00 97.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.15 rank 5
167 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.54 92.68 97.80 94.83 Strong Dem + 12.21 rank 5
168 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.56 97.59 97.94 98.37 Strong Dem + 12.23 rank 5
169 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
95.59 97.59 96.17 98.37 Strong Dem + 12.26 rank 5
170 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.63 95.24 95.44 96.75 Strong Dem + 12.30 rank 5
171 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.73 98.80 97.49 99.19 Strong Dem + 12.40 rank 5
172 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.76 97.62 97.22 98.39 Strong Dem + 12.43 rank 5
173 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.82 100.00 97.16 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.49 rank 5
174 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.98 98.80 98.20 99.18 Strong Dem + 12.65 rank 5
175 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.98 97.59 97.71 98.33 Strong Dem + 12.65 rank 5
176 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.07 91.25 98.68 93.97 Strong Dem + 12.74 rank 5
177 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.08 98.80 96.68 99.17 Strong Dem + 12.75 rank 5
178 Randall, Emily D
WA-6
96.25 96.25 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 12.92 rank 5
179 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
96.26 96.39 97.37 97.44 Strong Dem + 12.93 rank 5
180 Simon, Lateefah D
CA-12
96.34 96.34 97.52 97.52 Strong Dem + 13.01 rank 5
181 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
96.35 98.81 95.93 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.02 rank 5
182 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
96.44 98.78 97.55 99.16 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
183 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
96.55 100.00 97.45 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
184 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.55 98.81 96.73 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
185 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.59 98.81 98.18 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
186 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
96.70 98.81 98.07 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.37 rank 5
187 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.72 98.81 96.35 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
188 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.81 96.43 98.10 97.58 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
189 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.81 98.80 98.19 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
190 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.81 98.81 98.20 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
191 Clarke, Yvette 1 D
NY-9
96.87 98.80 98.35 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.54 rank 5
192 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
96.93 98.80 96.91 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.60 rank 5
193 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.07 97.59 97.68 98.32 Strong Dem + 13.74 rank 5
194 Watson Coleman, Bonnie 1 D
NJ-12
97.18 100.00 98.68 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.85 rank 5
195 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.25 98.81 97.78 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.92 rank 5
196 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.25 98.81 98.13 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.92 rank 5
197 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.26 96.43 97.78 97.50 Strong Dem + 13.93 rank 5
198 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.38 96.34 98.48 97.52 Strong Dem + 14.05 rank 5
199 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.39 98.81 97.64 99.18 Strong Dem + 14.06 rank 5
200 Ansari, Yassamin D
AZ-3
97.59 97.59 98.32 98.32 Strong Dem + 14.26 rank 5
201 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
97.95 97.62 98.43 98.37 Strong Dem + 14.62 rank 5
202 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.15 100.00 99.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.82 rank 5
203 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.59 100.00 98.35 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.26 rank 5
204 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
98.69 100.00 98.02 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.36 rank 5
205 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.69 100.00 98.91 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.36 rank 5
206 Rivas, Luz D
CA-29
98.80 98.80 99.18 99.18 Strong Dem + 15.47 rank 5
207 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
99.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.79 rank 5
208 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
99.13 100.00 99.21 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.80 rank 5
209 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.34 100.00 98.71 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.01 rank 5
210 McIver, LaMonica D
NJ-10
100.00 100.00 99.39 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
211 Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.41 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
212 Dexter, Maxine D
OR-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. District Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. District Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her district is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their districts. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their districts.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. District Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)