What: All Issues
 Who: Senate
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

2025-26 Progressive Scores Lifetime Progressive Scores
Rank Member of Congress Party State State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt Overall Votes % Crucial Votes % vs. State Tilt
1 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE
Strong Dem 97.47 98.83 rank 5 97.47 98.83 N/A
(1st Term)
2 Warren, Elizabeth D
MA
Strong Dem 99.39 100.00 rank 5 99.14 98.64 rank 5
3 Hirono, Mazie D
HI
Strong Dem 97.62 98.54 rank 5 98.12 98.26 rank 5
4 Markey, Ed D
MA
Strong Dem 99.55 99.71 rank 5 98.94 98.13 rank 5
5 Merkley, Jeff D
OR
Strong Dem 99.55 99.41 rank 5 98.24 97.21 rank 5
6 Van Hollen, Chris D
MD
Strong Dem 99.25 99.42 rank 5 96.43 96.09 rank 5
7 Schatz, Brian D
HI
Strong Dem 97.31 97.07 rank 5 96.85 95.89 rank 5
8 Smith, Tina 1 D
MN
Leans Dem 98.60 98.75 rank 5 96.33 95.68 rank 5
9 Booker, Cory D
NJ
Leans Dem 94.92 92.24 rank 5 97.26 95.17 rank 5
10 Alsobrooks, Angela D
MD
Strong Dem 94.74 95.03 rank 5 94.74 95.03 N/A
(1st Term)
11 Sanders, Bernie I
VT
Strong Dem 97.92 96.62 rank 5 96.53 95.02 rank 5
12 Padilla, Alex D
CA
Strong Dem 96.29 94.85 rank 5 97.49 94.97 rank 5
13 Gillibrand, Kirsten D
NY
Strong Dem 91.44 88.92 rank 5 97.31 94.93 rank 5
14 Baldwin, Tammy D
WI
Swing 94.80 94.46 rank 5 95.40 94.87 rank 5
15 Blumenthal, Richard D
CT
Strong Dem 95.96 97.08 rank 5 96.31 94.72 rank 5
16 Lujan, Ben D
NM
Leans Dem 94.28 93.24 rank 5 96.59 93.99 rank 5
17 Durbin, Dick D
IL
Strong Dem 89.82 86.90 rank 5 94.54 93.77 rank 5
18 Welch, Peter D
VT
Strong Dem 93.57 91.59 rank 5 95.95 93.69 rank 5
19 Reed, Jack D
RI
Strong Dem 90.85 87.46 rank 5 95.05 93.57 rank 5
20 Schumer, Chuck D
NY
Strong Dem 96.42 97.37 rank 5 94.91 92.15 rank 5
21 Whitehouse, Sheldon D
RI
Strong Dem 91.83 91.24 rank 5 94.17 92.05 rank 5
22 Ossoff, Jon D
GA
Swing 91.31 89.30 rank 5 95.21 91.97 rank 5
23 Warnock, Raphael D
GA
Swing 90.27 87.54 rank 5 95.03 91.87 rank 5
24 Heinrich, Martin D
NM
Leans Dem 88.84 83.82 rank 5 93.91 91.40 rank 5
25 Duckworth, Tammy D
IL
Strong Dem 93.97 91.69 rank 5 93.26 90.86 rank 5
26 Hickenlooper, John D
CO
Strong Dem 90.38 87.98 rank 5 94.65 90.59 rank 5
27 Kim, Andy D
NJ
Leans Dem 93.26 90.06 rank 5 93.28 90.11 rank 5
28 Cantwell, Maria D
WA
Strong Dem 94.35 94.75 rank 5 93.59 89.96 rank 5
29 Murray, Patty D
WA
Strong Dem 95.55 93.81 rank 5 93.35 89.94 rank 5
30 Wyden, Ron D
OR
Strong Dem 97.73 97.62 rank 5 93.51 89.91 rank 5
31 Murphy, Chris D
CT
Strong Dem 98.48 98.24 rank 5 92.61 89.51 rank 5
32 Cortez Masto, Catherine D
NV
Swing 86.67 85.13 rank 5 90.68 88.10 rank 5
33 Peters, Gary D
MI
Swing 90.62 88.46 rank 5 91.11 87.93 rank 5
34 Schiff, Adam D
CA
Strong Dem 92.41 88.27 rank 5 91.96 87.54 rank 5
35 Klobuchar, Amy D
MN
Leans Dem 89.66 85.92 rank 5 92.38 87.26 rank 5
36 Kelly, Mark D
AZ
Swing 85.00 79.34 rank 5 91.54 85.58 rank 5
37 Coons, Chris D
DE
Strong Dem 90.33 86.24 rank 5 90.47 84.12 rank 5
38 Bennet, Michael D
CO
Strong Dem 93.36 91.99 rank 5 90.30 83.98 rank 5
39 Rosen, Jacky D
NV
Swing 84.21 78.07 rank 5 89.24 82.89 rank 5
40 Kaine, Tim D
VA
Leans Dem 85.80 78.01 rank 5 89.21 82.58 rank 5
41 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI
Swing 86.78 81.60 rank 5 86.78 81.60 N/A
(1st Term)
42 Shaheen, Jeanne D
NH
Leans Dem 80.55 73.05 rank 5 88.54 79.76 rank 5
43 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ
Swing 84.92 79.57 rank 5 84.92 79.57 N/A
(1st Term)
44 Hassan, Maggie D
NH
Leans Dem 81.27 71.55 rank 5 86.30 78.73 rank 5
45 Fetterman, John 1 D
PA
Swing 76.66 72.95 rank 5 83.66 77.91 rank 5
46 Warner, Mark D
VA
Leans Dem 85.00 78.82 rank 5 87.29 77.65 rank 5
47 King, Angus I
ME
Leans Dem 81.60 76.92 rank 5 85.21 76.61 rank 5
48 Collins, Susan R
ME
Leans Dem 12.91 19.53 rank 5 37.70 23.77 rank 5
49 Murkowski, Lisa R
AK
Strong Rep 13.20 19.41 rank 5 28.18 11.87 rank 5
50 Paul, Rand 1 R
KY
Strong Rep 12.98 13.51 rank 5 9.62 11.14 rank 5
51 Lee, Mike R
UT
Strong Rep 1.06 0.59 rank 5 5.39 4.85 rank 5
52 Graham, Lindsey R
SC
Strong Rep 0.93 0.00 rank 5 15.55 4.52 rank 5
53 Hawley, Josh R
MO
Strong Rep 4.29 6.59 rank 5 3.47 4.05 rank 5
54 Grassley, Chuck R
IA
Strong Rep 0.75 0.00 rank 5 8.54 3.82 rank 5
55 Sullivan, Dan R
AK
Strong Rep 2.57 2.96 rank 5 5.66 2.90 rank 5
56 Moran, Jerry R
KS
Strong Rep 1.39 0.60 rank 5 7.60 2.37 rank 5
57 Daines, Steve R
MT
Strong Rep 0.15 0.30 rank 5 3.49 2.36 rank 5
58 Cruz, Ted R
TX
Strong Rep 0.61 0.00 rank 5 2.10 2.26 rank 5
59 Kennedy, John R
LA
Strong Rep 0.60 0.00 rank 5 5.49 1.96 rank 5
60 Lummis, Cynthia R
WY
Strong Rep 0.15 0.30 rank 5 2.80 1.77 rank 5
61 McConnell, Mitch R
KY
Strong Rep 3.43 3.60 rank 5 6.23 1.75 rank 5
62 Thune, John R
SD
Strong Rep 2.23 0.00 rank 5 4.46 1.74 rank 5
63 Hoeven, John R
ND
Strong Rep 0.30 0.00 rank 5 5.56 1.74 rank 5
64 Crapo, Mike R
ID
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 3.80 1.26 rank 5
65 Tillis, Thom R
NC
Swing 2.25 2.11 rank 5 11.86 1.20 rank 5
66 Rounds, Mike R
SD
Strong Rep 1.19 0.00 rank 5 10.64 1.19 rank 5
67 Cassidy, Bill R
LA
Strong Rep 0.62 0.00 rank 5 6.88 1.19 rank 5
68 Capito, Shelley R
WV
Strong Rep 0.90 0.00 rank 5 11.08 1.18 rank 5
69 Johnson, Ron R
WI
Swing 0.30 0.00 rank 5 2.30 1.09 rank 5
70 Scott, Rick R
FL
Strong Rep 0.45 0.00 rank 5 1.28 1.08 rank 5
71 Tuberville, Tommy R
AL
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.99 1.07 rank 5
72 Marshall, Roger R
KS
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.36 1.06 rank 5
73 Cramer, Kevin R
ND
Strong Rep 0.46 0.00 rank 5 5.34 0.99 rank 5
74 Young, Todd R
IN
Strong Rep 0.60 0.29 rank 5 9.22 0.94 rank 5
75 Schmitt, Stephen R
MO
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.50 0.92 rank 5
76 Scott, Tim R
SC
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 2.05 0.91 rank 5
77 Wicker, Roger R
MS
Strong Rep 1.07 0.00 rank 5 7.27 0.86 rank 5
78 Hagerty, Bill R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.11 0.83 rank 5
79 Cornyn, John R
TX
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 5.50 0.83 rank 5
80 Barrasso, John R
WY
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 2.07 0.82 rank 5
81 Lankford, James R
OK
Strong Rep 0.30 0.00 rank 5 1.95 0.81 rank 5
82 Boozman, John R
AR
Strong Rep 1.05 0.00 rank 5 3.43 0.77 rank 5
83 Ernst, Joni R
IA
Strong Rep 0.30 0.00 rank 5 3.47 0.66 rank 5
84 Blackburn, Marsha R
TN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 1.04 0.60 rank 5
85 Curtis, John R
UT
Strong Rep 0.30 0.58 rank 5 0.30 0.58 N/A
(1st Term)
86 Risch, James R
ID
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 2.89 0.53 rank 5
87 Mullin, Markwayne R
OK
Strong Rep 0.76 0.00 rank 5 2.61 0.37 rank 5
88 Cotton, Tom R
AR
Strong Rep 0.30 0.00 rank 5 1.69 0.37 rank 5
89 Budd, Ted R
NC
Swing 0.45 0.58 rank 5 1.50 0.36 rank 5
90 Fischer, Deb R
NE
Strong Rep 0.75 0.29 rank 5 2.81 0.35 rank 5
91 Sheehy, Tim R
MT
Strong Rep 0.30 0.29 rank 5 0.30 0.29 N/A
(1st Term)
92 Britt, Elizabeth R
AL
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.50 0.18 rank 5
93 Hyde-Smith, Cindy R
MS
Strong Rep 0.75 0.00 rank 5 3.55 0.18 rank 5
94TIE Banks, Jim R
IN
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE Husted, Jon R
OH
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.15 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE Justice, Jim R
WV
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.15 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE McCormick, Dave R
PA
Swing 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.15 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE Moody, Ashley R
FL
Strong Rep 0.15 0.00 rank 5 0.15 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE Moreno, Bernie R
OH
Strong Rep 0.00 0.00 rank 5 0.00 0.00 N/A
(1st Term)
94TIE Ricketts, Pete R
NE
Strong Rep 0.45 0.00 rank 5 2.32 0.00 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

State Tilt

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic State = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic State = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal State = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican State = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican State = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

The “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” measure how naughty or nice a Senator's voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates Senators who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.