What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2019-20 Lifetime 2019-20 % Rating
1TIE Levin, Andy D
MI-9
100.00 100.00 99.81 99.81 Leaning Dem + 20.00 rank 5
1TIE Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
100.00 100.00 98.05 98.05 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
3 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
99.02 98.31 99.11 99.61 Strong Dem + 15.69 rank 5
4 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.78 98.33 99.20 99.23 Strong Dem + 15.45 rank 5
5 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-11
98.60 100.00 99.10 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.27 rank 5
6TIE Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
98.33 98.33 96.92 96.92 Strong Dem + 15.00 rank 5
6TIE Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-13
98.33 98.33 97.88 97.88 Strong Dem + 15.00 rank 5
8 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
98.05 98.33 98.81 99.42 Strong Dem + 14.72 rank 5
9 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
97.56 100.00 99.48 99.81 Strong Dem + 14.23 rank 5
10 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
97.06 96.67 99.11 99.23 Strong Dem + 13.73 rank 5
11 Chu, Judy D
CA-27
96.77 95.00 98.24 99.23 Strong Dem + 13.44 rank 5
12 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
96.72 98.33 97.36 99.61 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
13TIE Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
96.67 96.67 99.23 99.23 Strong Dem + 13.34 rank 5
13TIE Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
96.67 96.67 99.23 99.23 Strong Dem + 13.34 rank 5
15 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.55 96.67 98.11 99.42 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
16 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-3
96.51 96.67 98.06 99.02 Strong Dem + 13.18 rank 5
17 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.26 91.67 98.68 99.03 Strong Dem + 12.93 rank 5
18 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.04 100.00 98.21 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.71 rank 5
19 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.66 96.67 96.88 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.33 rank 5
20 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.56 96.61 98.51 99.42 Strong Dem + 12.23 rank 5
21 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
95.28 93.33 98.80 99.04 Strong Dem + 11.95 rank 5
22 Lee, Barbara D
CA-13
95.22 100.00 97.47 99.42 Strong Dem + 11.89 rank 5
23 Lowenthal, Alan D
CA-47
95.10 100.00 98.18 99.81 Strong Dem + 11.77 rank 5
24 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
95.00 95.00 97.23 97.23 Strong Dem + 11.67 rank 5
25 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-10
94.97 94.83 96.72 99.21 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
26 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
94.86 86.44 97.27 98.43 Strong Dem + 11.53 rank 5
27 Lewis, John1 D
GA-5
94.72 82.76 96.65 97.85 Strong Dem + 11.39 rank 5
28 Bass, Karen D
CA-37
94.10 95.00 97.37 99.19 Strong Dem + 10.77 rank 5
29 Pelosi, Nancy3 D
CA-12
93.61 75.00 94.92 97.30 Strong Dem + 10.28 rank 5
30 Serrano, José D
NY-15
93.53 82.46 95.66 97.79 Strong Dem + 10.20 rank 5
31 Roybal-Allard, Lucille D
CA-40
93.48 91.53 95.59 99.04 Strong Dem + 10.15 rank 5
32 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
93.33 93.33 99.03 99.03 Strong Dem + 10.00 rank 5
33 Takano, Mark D
CA-41
93.23 93.33 97.97 99.02 Strong Dem + 9.90 rank 5
34 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
93.15 93.33 97.80 98.62 Strong Dem + 9.82 rank 5
35 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.12 91.67 97.25 99.03 Strong Dem + 9.80 rank 5
36 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.10 93.33 97.06 98.64 Strong Dem + 9.77 rank 5
37 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.07 95.00 96.00 99.42 Strong Dem + 9.74 rank 5
38 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
92.90 88.33 95.70 98.46 Strong Dem + 9.57 rank 5
39 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-32
92.63 93.33 95.80 99.04 Strong Dem + 9.30 rank 5
40 Bonamici, Suzanne D
OR-1
92.07 96.67 97.10 99.62 Strong Dem + 8.74 rank 5
41 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
91.93 84.21 97.14 97.88 Strong Dem + 8.60 rank 5
42 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
91.91 86.67 97.21 98.26 Strong Dem + 8.58 rank 5
43TIE Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
91.67 91.67 97.31 97.31 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
43TIE Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
91.67 91.67 99.04 99.04 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
45 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
91.54 98.31 97.73 99.80 Strong Dem + 8.21 rank 5
46 Kennedy, Joe D
MA-4
91.02 96.67 97.05 99.61 Strong Dem + 7.69 rank 5
47 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
90.71 95.00 94.90 99.42 Strong Dem + 7.38 rank 5
48 Cicilline, David D
RI-1
90.59 90.00 96.50 98.65 Strong Dem + 7.26 rank 5
49 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
90.49 95.00 96.65 99.23 Strong Dem + 7.16 rank 5
50 Matsui, Doris D
CA-6
90.14 86.67 96.35 98.46 Strong Dem + 6.81 rank 5
51 Haaland, Debra D
NM-1
90.00 90.00 98.84 98.84 Strong Dem + 6.67 rank 5
52 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
89.84 91.67 96.08 98.44 Strong Dem + 6.51 rank 5
53 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
89.84 88.33 96.79 98.65 Strong Dem + 6.51 rank 5
54 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
89.68 85.00 96.75 98.07 Strong Dem + 6.35 rank 5
55 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
89.60 96.67 94.01 99.03 Strong Dem + 6.27 rank 5
56 Fudge, Marcia D
OH-11
89.41 71.70 96.23 96.88 Strong Dem + 6.08 rank 5
57 Welch, Peter D
VT-AL
89.24 86.67 96.00 98.43 Strong Dem + 5.91 rank 5
58 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
89.23 88.33 98.51 98.65 Strong Dem + 5.90 rank 5
59 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-7
89.20 88.33 97.06 98.64 Strong Dem + 5.87 rank 5
60 Rush, Bobby D
IL-1
89.05 88.33 93.89 98.42 Strong Dem + 5.72 rank 5
61 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
88.91 86.67 95.05 98.08 Strong Dem + 5.58 rank 5
62 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
88.83 91.67 97.50 99.02 Strong Dem + 5.50 rank 5
63 Kildee, Dan D
MI-5
88.66 91.67 96.51 98.85 Leaning Dem + 8.66 rank 5
64 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.66 80.00 95.77 97.72 Strong Dem + 5.33 rank 5
65 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
88.33 88.33 98.65 98.65 Strong Dem + 5.00 rank 5
66 Clay, William D
MO-1
87.95 89.83 94.80 98.80 Strong Dem + 4.62 rank 5
67 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.90 83.33 93.53 98.02 Strong Dem + 4.57 rank 5
68 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
87.71 85.00 96.74 98.00 Strong Dem + 4.38 rank 5
69 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-35
87.62 91.67 92.56 98.22 Strong Dem + 4.29 rank 5
70 Lawrence, Brenda D
MI-14
87.54 85.45 96.84 98.39 Strong Dem + 4.21 rank 5
71 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.42 95.00 93.27 99.23 Strong Dem + 4.09 rank 5
72 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-19
87.39 88.33 92.53 98.44 Strong Dem + 4.06 rank 5
73 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-12
87.11 88.14 96.79 98.43 Strong Dem + 3.78 rank 5
74 Yarmuth, John D
KY-3
86.99 90.00 95.96 98.65 Strong Dem + 3.66 rank 5
75 Hastings, Alcee D
FL-20
86.90 81.48 93.16 97.52 Strong Dem + 3.57 rank 5
76 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
86.77 100.00 96.08 99.81 Strong Dem + 3.44 rank 5
77 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-18
86.76 86.67 92.90 98.42 Strong Dem + 3.43 rank 5
78 Maloney, Carolyn D
NY-12
86.61 96.67 92.77 99.62 Strong Dem + 3.28 rank 5
79 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
86.41 89.83 95.87 98.44 Strong Dem + 3.08 rank 5
80 Speier, Jackie D
CA-14
86.13 86.21 95.28 98.23 Strong Dem + 2.80 rank 5
81 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.01 96.67 92.11 99.61 Strong Dem + 2.68 rank 5
82 Deutch, Ted D
FL-22
85.99 85.00 95.12 98.05 Strong Dem + 2.66 rank 5
83 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
85.92 85.00 92.81 98.25 Strong Dem + 2.59 rank 5
84 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.68 81.67 93.18 97.88 Strong Dem + 2.35 rank 5
85 Frankel, Lois D
FL-21
85.52 83.33 95.71 97.78 Strong Dem + 2.19 rank 5
86 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
85.50 76.67 92.31 96.93 Strong Dem + 2.17 rank 5
87 Engel, Eliot D
NY-16
85.48 98.33 91.98 99.81 Strong Dem + 2.15 rank 5
88 Lieu, Ted D
CA-33
85.47 98.31 96.36 99.60 Strong Dem + 2.14 rank 5
89 Carson, André D
IN-7
85.13 88.33 95.01 98.06 Strong Dem + 1.80 rank 5
90 Lowey, Nita D
NY-17
85.03 83.33 92.13 98.05 Strong Dem + 1.70 rank 5
91 Shalala, Donna D
FL-27
85.00 85.00 98.08 98.08 Strong Dem + 1.67 rank 5
92 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
84.99 79.66 94.45 97.18 Strong Dem + 1.66 rank 5
93 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
84.75 84.75 98.23 98.23 Leaning Dem + 4.75 rank 5
94 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
84.33 85.00 95.30 98.17 Strong Dem + 1.00 rank 5
95 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
84.16 86.67 94.76 98.26 Strong Dem + 0.83 rank 5
96 Johnson, Eddie D
TX-30
84.04 83.05 91.57 98.05 Strong Dem + 0.71 rank 5
97 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
83.66 91.67 96.01 98.84 Strong Dem + 0.33 rank 5
98 Castro, Joaquin D
TX-20
83.51 92.98 95.23 99.01 Strong Dem + 0.18 rank 5
99 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
83.11 86.67 92.11 98.37 Strong Dem - 0.22 rank 5
100 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
83.09 84.75 94.18 98.05 Strong Dem - 0.24 rank 5
101 DeFazio, Peter D
OR-4
82.87 98.33 90.56 99.41 Swing + 6.20 rank 5
102 Schiff, Adam D
CA-28
82.87 85.00 92.86 98.27 Strong Dem - 0.46 rank 5
103 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
82.71 76.67 95.07 97.20 Leaning Rep + 9.38 rank 5
104 Thompson, Mike D
CA-5
82.40 85.00 92.08 98.22 Strong Dem - 0.93 rank 5
105 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
82.23 84.48 91.13 98.01 Strong Dem - 1.10 rank 5
106 Sherman, Brad D
CA-30
82.19 81.67 90.99 97.87 Strong Dem - 1.14 rank 5
107 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-23
82.19 80.00 93.93 97.23 Strong Dem - 1.14 rank 5
108 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.13 75.00 91.13 96.78 Strong Dem - 1.20 rank 5
109TIE Levin, Mike D
CA-49
81.67 81.67 97.89 97.89 Leaning Dem + 1.67 rank 5
109TIE Mucarsel-Powell, Debbie D
FL-26
81.67 81.67 97.69 97.69 Strong Dem - 1.66 rank 5
109TIE Stanton, Greg D
AZ-9
81.67 81.67 97.88 97.88 Strong Dem - 1.66 rank 5
112 Davis, Susan D
CA-53
81.40 83.33 92.59 98.05 Strong Dem - 1.93 rank 5
113 Lujan, Ben D
NM-3
80.88 86.67 93.86 98.46 Strong Dem - 2.45 rank 5
114 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-15
80.87 80.36 94.72 97.33 Strong Dem - 2.46 rank 5
115 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
80.81 88.33 90.61 98.45 Strong Dem - 2.52 rank 5
116 Price, David D
NC-4
80.72 90.00 90.81 98.65 Strong Dem - 2.61 rank 5
117 Brown, Anthony D
MD-4
80.60 85.00 96.07 98.26 Strong Dem - 2.73 rank 5
118 Sires, Albio D
NJ-8
80.58 80.00 94.08 97.67 Strong Dem - 2.75 rank 5
119 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
80.45 81.67 93.51 97.67 Strong Dem - 2.88 rank 5
120 Vargas, Juan D
CA-51
80.38 93.22 94.37 98.61 Strong Dem - 2.95 rank 5
121 Langevin, Jim D
RI-2
80.13 78.33 92.19 97.11 Leaning Dem + 0.13 rank 5
122 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
80.00 85.00 95.83 98.06 Strong Dem - 3.33 rank 5
123 Butler Demings, Val D
FL-10
79.41 75.00 95.67 96.92 Strong Dem - 3.92 rank 5
124 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
79.29 88.14 95.67 98.46 Strong Dem - 4.04 rank 5
125 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
79.21 88.14 95.26 98.45 Strong Dem - 4.12 rank 5
126 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
78.89 89.83 94.16 98.59 Strong Dem - 4.44 rank 5
127 Garamendi, John D
CA-3
78.69 83.33 92.63 97.46 Strong Dem - 4.64 rank 5
128 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
78.54 83.33 95.63 97.88 Strong Dem - 4.79 rank 5
129 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
78.43 90.00 94.96 98.45 Strong Dem - 4.90 rank 5
130 Richmond, Cedric D
LA-2
78.41 84.21 92.51 97.34 Strong Dem - 4.92 rank 5
131TIE Casten, Sean D
IL-6
78.33 78.33 97.31 97.31 Leaning Dem - 1.67 rank 5
131TIE Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
78.33 78.33 97.50 97.50 Swing + 1.66 rank 5
131TIE Trone, David D
MD-6
78.33 78.33 97.11 97.11 Strong Dem - 5.00 rank 5
134 Butterfield, G.K. D
NC-1
78.20 83.33 92.26 97.88 Strong Dem - 5.13 rank 5
135 Higgins, Brian D
NY-26
78.15 86.67 92.98 98.46 Strong Dem - 5.18 rank 5
136 Ryan, Tim D
OH-13
78.09 79.63 92.11 97.35 Leaning Dem - 1.91 rank 5
137 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
77.97 76.67 91.40 96.70 Strong Dem - 5.36 rank 5
138 Green, Al D
TX-9
77.91 90.00 92.64 98.85 Strong Dem - 5.42 rank 5
139 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
77.82 78.33 89.23 97.48 Strong Dem - 5.51 rank 5
140 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
77.73 91.67 94.09 99.02 Strong Dem - 5.60 rank 5
141 McEachin, Donald D
VA-4
77.11 66.67 95.16 94.75 Strong Dem - 6.22 rank 5
142 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
76.67 76.67 97.31 97.31 Strong Dem - 6.66 rank 5
143 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.65 79.31 88.38 97.67 Strong Dem - 6.68 rank 5
144 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
76.51 83.33 93.17 98.08 Leaning Dem - 3.49 rank 5
145 Heck, Denny D
WA-10
75.90 83.05 93.72 97.86 Strong Dem - 7.43 rank 5
146 Visclosky, Peter D
IN-1
75.79 80.00 88.27 97.68 Strong Dem - 7.54 rank 5
147 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
75.49 83.33 93.28 97.86 Leaning Dem - 4.51 rank 5
148 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
75.38 73.33 96.53 96.41 Strong Dem - 7.95 rank 5
149 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
75.32 86.67 90.20 97.89 Strong Dem - 8.01 rank 5
150 Gabbard, Tulsi D
HI-2
74.74 54.35 92.37 92.28 Strong Dem - 8.59 rank 5
151 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
74.25 88.33 94.22 98.64 Strong Dem - 9.08 rank 5
152 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
73.58 85.00 93.28 98.27 Strong Dem - 9.75 rank 5
153 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
73.37 70.37 93.74 95.01 Strong Dem - 9.96 rank 5
154TIE Malinowski, Tom D
NJ-7
73.33 73.33 96.92 96.92 Leaning Dem - 6.67 rank 5
154TIE Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
73.33 73.33 96.74 96.74 Leaning Dem - 6.67 rank 5
156 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
73.27 80.00 92.65 97.31 Strong Dem - 10.06 rank 5
157 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
73.21 93.33 87.08 99.22 Strong Dem - 10.12 rank 5
158 McNerney, Jerry D
CA-9
73.07 80.00 91.24 97.62 Strong Dem - 10.26 rank 5
159 Doyle, Mike D
PA-18
72.29 91.53 86.77 98.82 Strong Dem - 11.04 rank 5
160 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-20
72.20 73.33 94.00 96.74 Strong Dem - 11.13 rank 5
161 Kind, Ron D
WI-3
71.90 75.00 86.18 96.00 Swing - 4.77 rank 5
162 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
71.70 80.00 91.41 96.91 Strong Dem - 11.63 rank 5
163 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
70.98 76.67 89.98 96.89 Strong Dem - 12.35 rank 5
164 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
70.22 81.67 92.45 97.89 Strong Dem - 13.11 rank 5
165TIE Cisneros, Gil D
CA-39
70.00 70.00 96.35 96.35 Leaning Dem - 10.00 rank 5
165TIE Crow, Jason D
CO-6
70.00 70.00 96.15 96.15 Leaning Dem - 10.00 rank 5
165TIE Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
70.00 70.00 93.47 93.47 Swing - 6.67 rank 5
165TIE Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
70.00 70.00 96.55 96.55 Leaning Dem - 10.00 rank 5
165TIE Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
70.00 70.00 96.15 96.15 Swing - 6.67 rank 5
170 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
69.84 68.33 95.48 95.36 Swing - 6.83 rank 5
171 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
68.97 68.97 96.14 96.14 Swing - 7.70 rank 5
172 Rouda, Harley D
CA-48
68.33 68.33 95.87 95.87 Leaning Dem - 11.67 rank 5
173 Loebsack, Dave D
IA-2
68.26 70.00 91.02 96.50 Swing - 8.41 rank 5
174 Scott, David D
GA-13
68.21 81.67 88.26 97.68 Strong Dem - 15.12 rank 5
175 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
67.82 81.67 93.25 97.89 Strong Dem - 15.51 rank 5
176 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
67.80 67.80 95.47 95.47 Leaning Dem - 12.20 rank 5
177 Perlmutter, Ed D
CO-7
67.61 69.81 89.83 96.15 Strong Dem - 15.72 rank 5
178 Case, Ed D
HI-1
67.12 65.00 81.73 95.57 Strong Dem - 16.21 rank 5
179 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
67.06 78.33 91.52 97.47 Leaning Dem - 12.94 rank 5
180 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
66.91 78.33 89.38 97.22 Strong Dem - 16.42 rank 5
181TIE Cox, T. J. D
CA-21
66.67 66.67 95.16 95.16 Strong Dem - 16.66 rank 5
181TIE Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
66.67 66.67 95.77 95.77 Swing - 10.00 rank 5
183 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
66.39 77.97 88.04 97.09 Strong Dem - 16.94 rank 5
184 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
65.40 83.33 90.11 98.06 Strong Dem - 17.93 rank 5
185 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
64.59 83.33 91.08 98.08 Strong Dem - 18.74 rank 5
186 Harder, Josh D
CA-10
64.41 64.41 94.79 94.79 Leaning Dem - 15.59 rank 5
187 González, Vicente D
TX-15
64.39 78.33 89.08 94.49 Strong Dem - 18.94 rank 5
188 Rice, Kathleen D
NY-4
63.87 71.67 92.30 96.04 Strong Dem - 19.46 rank 5
189TIE Lee, Susie D
NV-3
63.33 63.33 95.58 95.58 Swing - 13.34 rank 5
189TIE McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
63.33 63.33 95.20 95.20 Swing - 13.34 rank 5
189TIE Porter, Katie D
CA-45
63.33 63.33 94.37 94.37 Leaning Dem - 16.67 rank 5
192 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
62.93 85.00 90.59 97.85 Strong Dem - 20.40 rank 5
193TIE Delgado, Antonio D
NY-19
61.67 61.67 95.20 95.20 Leaning Rep - 11.66 rank 5
193TIE Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
61.67 61.67 95.01 95.01 Leaning Dem - 18.33 rank 5
195 Schrader, Kurt D
OR-5
60.09 60.34 82.87 93.18 Leaning Dem - 19.91 rank 5
196 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-31
60.06 81.67 91.59 97.67 Strong Dem - 23.27 rank 5
197 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
60.00 60.00 95.01 95.01 Swing - 16.67 rank 5
198 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
59.20 76.67 90.14 96.72 Leaning Dem - 20.80 rank 5
199 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
59.07 78.33 79.12 96.46 Strong Dem - 24.26 rank 5
200 Crist, Charlie D
FL-13
58.42 70.00 90.72 96.35 Leaning Dem - 21.58 rank 5
201 Rose, Max D
NY-11
58.33 58.33 93.57 93.57 Leaning Rep - 15.00 rank 5
202 Vela, Filemon D
TX-34
58.08 85.00 86.03 95.75 Strong Dem - 25.25 rank 5
203 Lipinski, Daniel D
IL-3
58.03 66.67 84.62 93.59 Strong Dem - 25.30 rank 5
204 Cooper, Jim D
TN-5
56.80 73.33 79.24 94.36 Strong Dem - 26.53 rank 5
205 Lawson, Al D
FL-5
56.65 70.00 90.82 96.26 Strong Dem - 26.68 rank 5
206 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
56.32 78.33 86.51 97.50 Strong Dem - 27.01 rank 5
207 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-36
55.52 85.00 88.16 98.27 Strong Dem - 27.81 rank 5
208 Bera, Ami D
CA-7
54.92 80.00 88.09 97.70 Strong Dem - 28.41 rank 5
209 Kirkpatrick, Ann D
AZ-2
53.64 76.27 82.52 96.66 Leaning Dem - 26.36 rank 5
210 Bustos, Cheri D
IL-17
53.32 70.00 88.32 96.55 Swing - 23.35 rank 5
211 Peters, Scott D
CA-52
52.54 66.67 84.89 94.87 Strong Dem - 30.79 rank 5
212 Lamb, Conor D
PA-17
51.82 46.67 85.56 90.40 Swing - 24.85 rank 5
213 Maloney, Sean D
NY-18
50.94 75.00 86.81 96.52 Swing - 25.73 rank 5
214 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
50.00 50.00 93.45 93.45 Swing - 26.67 rank 5
215 O'Halleran, Tom D
AZ-1
49.51 66.67 86.79 95.94 Swing - 27.16 rank 5
216 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
48.33 48.33 92.71 92.71 Swing - 28.34 rank 5
217 Murphy, Stephanie D
FL-7
47.06 51.67 86.02 92.69 Leaning Dem - 32.94 rank 5
218TIE Finkenauer, Abby D
IA-1
46.67 46.67 93.47 93.47 Swing - 30.00 rank 5
218TIE Torres Small, Xochitl D
NM-2
46.67 46.67 91.91 91.91 Leaning Rep - 26.66 rank 5
220 Luria, Elaine D
VA-2
45.76 45.76 90.29 90.29 Swing - 30.91 rank 5
221 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-8
45.00 45.00 92.13 92.13 Leaning Rep - 28.33 rank 5
222 Costa, Jim D
CA-16
43.92 71.67 74.05 94.22 Strong Dem - 39.41 rank 5
223 Axne, Cindy D
IA-3
40.00 40.00 91.60 91.60 Swing - 36.67 rank 5
224 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
39.62 65.00 74.03 90.21 Strong Dem - 43.71 rank 5
225 Peterson, Collin D
MN-7
39.11 38.33 60.59 79.07 Strong Rep - 30.89 rank 5
226 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
38.24 30.00 81.62 88.63 Swing - 38.43 rank 5
227 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
35.00 35.00 88.29 88.29 Leaning Rep - 38.33 rank 5
229 McAdams, Ben D
UT-4
31.67 31.67 81.15 81.15 Strong Rep - 38.33 rank 5
230 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
30.00 30.00 89.60 89.60 Leaning Rep - 43.33 rank 5
232 Horn, Kendra D
OK-5
28.33 28.33 88.48 88.48 Strong Rep - 41.67 rank 5
234 Cunningham, Joe D
SC-1
23.33 23.33 83.63 83.63 Strong Rep - 46.67 rank 5
235 Brindisi, Anthony D
NY-22
21.67 21.67 85.00 85.00 Strong Rep - 48.33 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

3Nancy Pelosi's and Paul Ryan's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)