What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2025-26 Lifetime 2025-26 % Rating
1 Figures, Shomari D
AL-2
84.52 84.52 88.62 88.62 Strong Dem + 1.19 rank 5
2 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
75.87 85.71 90.60 90.24 Strong Dem - 7.46 rank 5
3 Ansari, Yassamin D
AZ-3
97.59 97.59 98.32 98.32 Strong Dem + 14.26 rank 5
4 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
81.49 79.01 92.03 85.83 Strong Dem - 1.84 rank 5
5 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.51 100.00 97.64 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.18 rank 5
6 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.07 91.67 92.54 93.55 Strong Dem - 0.26 rank 5
7 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
73.81 96.34 90.17 96.67 Strong Dem - 9.52 rank 5
8 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.49 98.81 96.31 99.19 Strong Dem + 8.16 rank 5
9 Garamendi, John 1 D
CA-8
83.52 92.59 93.09 94.50 Strong Dem + 0.19 rank 5
10 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
76.68 77.38 89.98 82.26 Swing + 0.01 rank 5
11 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.38 96.34 98.48 97.52 Strong Dem + 14.05 rank 5
12 Pelosi, Nancy 1 2 D
CA-11
92.92 97.37 94.86 98.11 Strong Dem + 9.59 rank 5
13 Simon, Lateefah D
CA-12
96.34 96.34 97.52 97.52 Strong Dem + 13.01 rank 5
14 Gray, Adam D
CA-13
77.38 77.38 74.19 74.19 Leans Rep + 4.05 rank 5
15 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
83.89 91.36 93.97 93.97 Strong Dem + 0.56 rank 5
16 Mullin, Kevin 1 D
CA-15
93.72 98.63 94.85 99.05 Strong Dem + 10.39 rank 5
17 Liccardo, Sam D
CA-16
95.24 95.24 96.77 96.77 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
18 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
96.81 96.43 98.10 97.58 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
19 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
87.66 95.18 93.03 96.72 Strong Dem + 4.33 rank 5
20 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
80.32 85.71 92.11 89.52 Strong Dem - 3.01 rank 5
21 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
54.46 85.37 76.85 84.30 Leans Dem - 25.54 rank 5
22 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
85.62 94.05 93.97 95.97 Strong Dem + 2.29 rank 5
23 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
75.36 95.06 90.59 96.67 Leans Dem - 4.64 rank 5
24 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
78.97 97.59 92.37 98.36 Strong Dem - 4.36 rank 5
25 Whitesides, George D
CA-27
79.01 79.01 83.76 83.76 Leans Dem - 0.99 rank 5
26 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.81 98.80 98.19 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
27 Rivas, Luz D
CA-29
98.80 98.80 99.18 99.18 Strong Dem + 15.47 rank 5
28 Friedman, Laura D
CA-30
95.18 95.18 96.75 96.75 Strong Dem + 11.85 rank 5
29 Cisneros, Gil D
CA-31
79.43 94.05 95.23 95.97 Strong Dem - 3.90 rank 5
30 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
82.75 95.12 91.64 96.64 Strong Dem - 0.58 rank 5
31 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
80.80 96.39 92.95 97.56 Strong Dem - 2.53 rank 5
32 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
95.54 92.68 97.80 94.83 Strong Dem + 12.21 rank 5
33 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.69 92.77 94.81 95.12 Strong Dem + 3.36 rank 5
34 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
89.95 96.39 95.88 97.56 Strong Dem + 6.62 rank 5
35 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
96.26 96.39 97.37 97.44 Strong Dem + 12.93 rank 5
36 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.09 100.00 97.23 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.76 rank 5
37 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.56 97.59 97.94 98.37 Strong Dem + 12.23 rank 5
38 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
96.44 98.78 97.55 99.16 Strong Dem + 13.11 rank 5
39 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.23 96.39 96.03 97.52 Strong Dem + 9.90 rank 5
40 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.98 97.59 97.71 98.33 Strong Dem + 12.65 rank 5
41 Tran, Derek D
CA-45
82.14 82.14 87.90 87.90 Swing + 5.47 rank 5
42 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
83.35 86.08 92.20 89.47 Strong Dem + 0.02 rank 5
43 Min, Dave D
CA-47
86.90 86.90 89.43 89.43 Leans Dem + 6.90 rank 5
44 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
85.77 84.52 93.91 89.52 Leans Dem + 5.77 rank 5
45 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
69.86 90.48 87.36 93.44 Strong Dem - 13.47 rank 5
46 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
96.55 100.00 97.45 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
47 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
88.54 95.18 95.17 96.75 Strong Dem + 5.21 rank 5
48 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.59 100.00 95.43 100.00 Strong Dem + 8.26 rank 5
49 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.76 97.62 97.22 98.39 Strong Dem + 12.43 rank 5
50 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.93 97.62 94.59 98.39 Strong Dem + 4.60 rank 5
51 Pettersen, Brittany 1 D
CO-7
85.98 91.94 91.00 93.90 Strong Dem + 2.65 rank 5
52 Larson, John D
CT-1
85.58 91.67 93.43 94.17 Strong Dem + 2.25 rank 5
53 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.84 88.10 93.12 91.94 Strong Dem - 3.49 rank 5
54 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
87.76 95.24 93.76 96.75 Strong Dem + 4.43 rank 5
55 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
77.19 91.57 90.72 93.50 Strong Dem - 6.14 rank 5
56 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.96 95.24 95.77 96.77 Strong Dem + 7.63 rank 5
57 McBride, Sarah D
DE-AL
89.29 89.29 92.74 92.74 Strong Dem + 5.96 rank 5
58 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
84.72 89.29 93.84 92.74 Leans Dem + 4.72 rank 5
59 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.69 100.00 98.91 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.36 rank 5
60 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
87.20 96.43 94.84 97.58 Strong Dem + 3.87 rank 5
61 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
94.08 94.05 95.32 95.93 Strong Dem + 10.75 rank 5
62 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.67 93.90 95.03 95.80 Leans Dem + 7.67 rank 5
63 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
74.73 79.76 83.45 82.11 Swing - 1.94 rank 5
64 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
88.61 85.71 95.28 90.18 Strong Dem + 5.28 rank 5
65 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.19 92.77 93.86 95.00 Leans Dem + 4.19 rank 5
66 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
61.32 86.75 81.10 87.50 Strong Dem - 22.01 rank 5
67 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.91 96.39 95.92 97.52 Strong Dem + 5.58 rank 5
68 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.59 100.00 98.35 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.26 rank 5
69 McBath, Lucy D
GA-6
86.80 89.16 93.96 92.50 Strong Dem + 3.47 rank 5
70 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.01 95.12 88.98 96.72 Strong Dem - 11.32 rank 5
71 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.32 91.57 86.71 91.87 Strong Dem - 8.01 rank 5
72 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
98.69 100.00 98.02 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.36 rank 5
73 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
94.71 92.50 95.99 93.91 Strong Dem + 11.38 rank 5
74 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
93.47 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 10.14 rank 5
75 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
99.12 100.00 99.20 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.79 rank 5
76 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.98 98.80 98.20 99.18 Strong Dem + 12.65 rank 5
77 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
86.12 93.98 94.36 95.93 Strong Dem + 2.79 rank 5
78 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
92.59 98.81 96.25 99.18 Leans Dem + 12.59 rank 5
79 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.29 100.00 96.34 100.00 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
80 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
88.28 96.43 95.13 97.58 Strong Dem + 4.95 rank 5
81 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.59 98.81 98.18 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
82 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
74.00 84.34 88.98 89.43 Strong Dem - 9.33 rank 5
83 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
77.90 95.24 91.59 96.77 Strong Dem - 5.43 rank 5
84 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.44 84.52 87.98 88.71 Strong Dem - 1.89 rank 5
85 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
91.62 98.81 96.14 99.19 Strong Dem + 8.29 rank 5
86 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
79.03 82.14 86.33 87.90 Leans Dem - 0.97 rank 5
87 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
82.83 81.48 90.93 87.39 Leans Dem + 2.83 rank 5
88 Carson, André D
IN-7
88.21 95.24 95.35 96.77 Strong Dem + 4.88 rank 5
89 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
81.53 82.14 92.12 87.90 Leans Dem + 1.53 rank 5
90 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.72 98.81 96.35 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
91 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.32 95.12 95.26 95.87 Strong Dem + 9.99 rank 5
92 Fields, Cleo D
LA-6
84.77 93.98 90.12 95.93 Strong Dem + 1.44 rank 5
93 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
86.48 90.12 93.34 93.16 Strong Dem + 3.15 rank 5
94 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.07 97.59 97.68 98.32 Strong Dem + 13.74 rank 5
95 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.05 93.83 97.21 95.76 Strong Dem + 11.72 rank 5
96 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
92.77 89.29 95.32 92.44 Strong Dem + 9.44 rank 5
97 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.81 98.81 98.20 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.48 rank 5
98 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
83.11 93.75 93.43 95.69 Strong Dem - 0.22 rank 5
99 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
97.25 98.81 98.13 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.92 rank 5
100 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
79.75 83.33 91.82 88.71 Strong Dem - 3.58 rank 5
101 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
84.15 90.48 93.67 93.44 Strong Dem + 0.82 rank 5
102 Olszewski, Johnny D
MD-2
92.86 92.86 95.16 95.16 Strong Dem + 9.53 rank 5
103 Elfreth, Sarah D
MD-3
91.67 91.67 94.35 94.35 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
104 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.63 95.24 95.44 96.75 Strong Dem + 12.30 rank 5
105 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
78.19 91.57 89.89 94.17 Strong Dem - 5.14 rank 5
106 McClain-Delaney, April D
MD-6
82.14 82.14 86.89 86.89 Strong Dem - 1.19 rank 5
107 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.16 92.86 94.77 95.16 Strong Dem + 8.83 rank 5
108 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
97.95 97.62 98.43 98.37 Strong Dem + 14.62 rank 5
109 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
94.12 98.77 97.25 99.14 Strong Dem + 10.79 rank 5
110 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
65.02 76.19 77.36 69.35 Leans Rep - 8.31 rank 5
111 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
80.31 79.52 87.70 85.37 Strong Dem - 3.02 rank 5
112 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.09 96.34 96.67 97.54 Strong Dem + 8.76 rank 5
113 McDonald Rivet, Kristen D
MI-8
80.95 80.95 81.45 81.45 Swing + 4.28 rank 5
114 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
88.08 91.57 94.58 94.31 Strong Dem + 4.75 rank 5
115 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.25 98.81 97.78 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.92 rank 5
116 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.00 93.98 93.88 95.93 Strong Dem + 9.67 rank 5
117 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
74.49 82.14 87.53 86.99 Strong Dem - 8.84 rank 5
118 Morrison, Kelly D
MN-3
94.05 94.05 95.93 95.93 Strong Dem + 10.72 rank 5
119 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.88 97.62 95.35 98.39 Strong Dem + 6.55 rank 5
120 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.26 96.43 97.78 97.50 Strong Dem + 13.93 rank 5
121 Bell, Wesley D
MO-1
95.24 95.24 95.97 95.97 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
122 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
87.02 94.05 94.57 95.93 Strong Dem + 3.69 rank 5
123 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.26 97.62 91.96 98.36 Strong Dem - 0.07 rank 5
124 Davis, Don D
NC-1
70.90 76.19 74.25 70.97 Swing - 5.77 rank 5
125 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.11 94.05 95.30 95.97 Strong Dem + 9.78 rank 5
126 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
96.93 98.80 96.91 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.60 rank 5
127 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.25 97.62 96.46 98.39 Strong Dem + 8.92 rank 5
128 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
77.43 79.76 89.63 85.48 Leans Dem - 2.57 rank 5
129 Goodlander, Maggie D
NH-2
83.33 83.33 87.90 87.90 Leans Dem + 3.33 rank 5
130 Norcross, Donald 1 D
NJ-1
82.22 91.49 93.62 94.20 Strong Dem - 1.11 rank 5
131 Conaway, Herb D
NJ-3
87.95 87.95 91.80 91.80 Strong Dem + 4.62 rank 5
132 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
64.71 60.26 84.08 70.09 Leans Dem - 15.29 rank 5
133 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
87.85 95.24 93.75 96.77 Strong Dem + 4.52 rank 5
134 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
93.44 97.62 94.35 98.39 Strong Dem + 10.11 rank 5
135 Pou, Nellie D
NJ-9
91.67 91.67 94.35 94.35 Swing + 15.00 rank 5
136 McIver, LaMonica D
NJ-10
100.00 100.00 99.39 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
137 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
76.40 72.22 90.26 78.72 Strong Dem - 6.93 rank 5
138 Watson Coleman, Bonnie 1 D
NJ-12
97.18 100.00 98.68 100.00 Strong Dem + 13.85 rank 5
139 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.08 98.80 96.68 99.17 Strong Dem + 12.75 rank 5
140 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
79.91 82.14 86.08 84.68 Swing + 3.24 rank 5
141 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.65 91.25 95.99 93.86 Leans Dem + 14.65 rank 5
142 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.08 88.10 94.00 91.87 Leans Dem + 3.08 rank 5
143 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
75.24 75.00 89.05 81.45 Swing - 1.43 rank 5
144 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
81.20 81.93 92.36 87.80 Leans Dem + 1.20 rank 5
145 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
72.87 75.00 89.51 76.61 Leans Rep - 0.46 rank 5
146 Gillen, Laura D
NY-4
75.00 75.00 76.61 76.61 Leans Dem - 5.00 rank 5
147 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
85.69 96.43 93.32 97.50 Strong Dem + 2.36 rank 5
148 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.41 93.98 96.07 95.93 Strong Dem + 7.08 rank 5
149 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.82 100.00 97.16 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.49 rank 5
150 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.94 98.81 96.95 99.19 Strong Dem + 10.61 rank 5
151 Clarke, Yvette 1 D
NY-9
96.87 98.80 98.35 99.17 Strong Dem + 13.54 rank 5
152 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.77 93.90 92.60 94.96 Strong Dem + 5.44 rank 5
153 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.21 100.00 96.92 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.88 rank 5
154 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
96.70 98.81 98.07 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.37 rank 5
155 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.39 98.81 97.64 99.18 Strong Dem + 14.06 rank 5
156 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
91.67 86.90 94.54 91.06 Strong Dem + 8.34 rank 5
157 Latimer, George D
NY-16
91.57 91.57 94.31 94.31 Strong Dem + 8.24 rank 5
158 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
78.65 79.76 86.85 86.18 Leans Dem - 1.35 rank 5
159 Riley, Josh D
NY-19
76.83 76.83 84.17 84.17 Leans Dem - 3.17 rank 5
160 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.47 98.78 96.67 99.17 Strong Dem + 9.14 rank 5
161 Mannion, John D
NY-22
83.33 83.33 87.90 87.90 Strong Dem + 0.00 rank 5
162 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.08 85.71 93.88 90.24 Strong Dem + 2.75 rank 5
163 Kennedy, Tim D
NY-26
87.63 89.29 92.43 92.74 Strong Dem + 4.30 rank 5
164 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
76.70 78.57 84.55 83.06 Strong Dem - 6.63 rank 5
165 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.77 85.71 95.60 88.99 Strong Dem + 6.44 rank 5
166 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
76.15 79.76 88.72 82.11 Leans Rep + 2.82 rank 5
167 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.55 98.81 96.73 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.22 rank 5
168 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
85.31 85.54 90.74 90.24 Swing + 8.64 rank 5
169 Bonamici, Suzanne 1 D
OR-1
95.48 100.00 97.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 12.15 rank 5
170 Dexter, Maxine D
OR-3
100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
171 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.26 90.48 94.56 93.33 Strong Dem + 8.93 rank 5
172 Bynum, Janelle D
OR-5
85.71 85.71 89.52 89.52 Strong Dem + 2.38 rank 5
173 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
88.40 92.86 92.45 95.16 Strong Dem + 5.07 rank 5
174 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.85 90.12 94.64 93.33 Strong Dem + 2.52 rank 5
175 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
85.12 100.00 94.65 100.00 Strong Dem + 1.79 rank 5
176 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
95.21 98.80 97.17 99.19 Strong Dem + 11.88 rank 5
177 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
94.67 98.81 97.28 99.19 Strong Dem + 11.34 rank 5
178 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.18 90.24 91.79 91.80 Strong Dem - 2.15 rank 5
179 Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.41 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
180 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
90.61 91.67 92.61 94.35 Strong Dem + 7.28 rank 5
181 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
95.37 95.24 94.73 96.77 Strong Dem + 12.04 rank 5
182 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
82.74 89.29 89.94 92.74 Strong Dem - 0.59 rank 5
183 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
82.87 96.39 91.84 97.54 Strong Dem - 0.46 rank 5
184 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.57 91.57 95.87 94.12 Strong Dem + 7.24 rank 5
185 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
84.38 98.81 91.80 98.39 Strong Dem + 1.05 rank 5
186 Green, Al D
TX-9
82.98 98.81 93.49 98.35 Strong Dem - 0.35 rank 5
187 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.73 98.80 97.49 99.19 Strong Dem + 12.40 rank 5
188 Castro, Joaquin 1 D
TX-20
90.11 97.59 95.96 98.37 Strong Dem + 6.78 rank 5
189 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.72 75.00 75.37 66.13 Leans Rep - 23.61 rank 5
190 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.92 100.00 96.93 100.00 Strong Dem + 11.59 rank 5
191 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
95.59 97.59 96.17 98.37 Strong Dem + 12.26 rank 5
192 Johnson, Julie D
TX-32
90.48 90.48 91.94 91.94 Strong Dem + 7.15 rank 5
193 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
81.17 88.10 92.46 89.52 Strong Dem - 2.16 rank 5
194 González, Vicente D
TX-34
76.11 78.57 86.82 72.58 Leans Rep + 2.78 rank 5
195 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
99.13 100.00 99.21 100.00 Strong Dem + 15.80 rank 5
196 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.46 100.00 93.35 100.00 Strong Dem + 5.13 rank 5
197 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.17 98.81 92.96 99.19 Strong Dem + 2.84 rank 5
198 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
96.35 98.81 95.93 99.19 Strong Dem + 13.02 rank 5
199 Vindman, Eugene D
VA-7
78.57 78.57 84.43 84.43 Leans Dem - 1.43 rank 5
200 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
91.24 98.81 96.36 99.18 Strong Dem + 7.91 rank 5
201 Subramanyam, Suhas D
VA-10
85.71 85.71 90.32 90.32 Strong Dem + 2.38 rank 5
202 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.34 100.00 98.71 100.00 Strong Dem + 16.01 rank 5
203 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
83.87 96.43 94.07 97.54 Strong Dem + 0.54 rank 5
204 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
77.72 91.67 91.02 94.21 Strong Dem - 5.61 rank 5
205 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
70.96 77.38 69.44 67.21 Swing - 5.71 rank 5
206 Randall, Emily D
WA-6
96.25 96.25 97.44 97.44 Strong Dem + 12.92 rank 5
207 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
96.07 91.25 98.68 93.97 Strong Dem + 12.74 rank 5
208 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
78.63 83.33 90.69 88.71 Leans Dem - 1.37 rank 5
209 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
75.92 98.78 88.77 99.17 Strong Dem - 7.41 rank 5
210 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.02 95.24 94.33 96.77 Strong Dem + 7.69 rank 5
211 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.15 100.00 99.00 100.00 Strong Dem + 14.82 rank 5
212 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.41 98.80 97.08 99.17 Strong Dem + 10.08 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. District Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. District Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her district is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their districts. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their districts.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. District Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)